Discover人工颈椎间盘置换术后异位骨化的临床研究

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2015.03.022

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 336-340.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2015.03.022

Discover人工颈椎间盘置换术后异位骨化的临床研究

梁英杰^1，2，张光明²，温世锋²，郭东明²，徐中和²，刘恩志²，钟润泉²，肖文德²，尹庆水^1，3

1.南方医科大学，广州 510515； 2.广州市第一人民医院脊柱外科，广州 510180；
3.广州军区广州总医院骨科医院，广州 510010

收稿日期:2015-01-10 出版日期:2015-05-25 发布日期:2015-07-24
通讯作者: 尹庆水，主任医师，教授，博士生导师，Tel：（020）36653539，E-mail：Pjhkone@hotmail.com
作者简介:梁英杰（1980-），广东省人，硕士，副主任医师，主要从事脊柱外科的临床与基础研究，Tel：13926463283，E-mail： lyjh8012@163.com
基金资助:
广东省科技厅科技计划项目（2012B031800334）

Clinical observation of heterotopic ossification after Discover cervical disc replacement

LIANG Ying-jie^1,2， ZHANG Guang-ming ²， WEN Shi-feng ², GUO Dong-ming ², XU Zhong-he², LIU En-zhi ²， ZHONG Run-quan ²， XIAO Wen-de ², YIN Qing-shui ^1,3

1.Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China; 2.Department of Spine Surgery, Guangzhou First People's Hospital,Guangzhou 510180, China; 3. Department of Orthopadedics,Guangzhou General Hospital of PLA, Guangzhou 510010, China

Received:2015-01-10 Online:2015-05-25 Published:2015-07-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　分析Discover人工颈椎间盘置换术治疗颈椎病的异位骨化形成原因及防治对策。方法回顾性分析23例应用Discover人工颈椎间盘置换术治疗的颈椎病患者。在术前、术后1周及末次随访时的颈椎X线片上测量置换节段矢状位、冠状位活动度，并根据McAfee分级法判断末次随访时置换节段的异位骨化情况。结果术后患者23例患者均获随访，时间27~36个月。末次随访置换节段矢状位活动范围（5.5±2.2）°；冠状位左右侧屈活动范围分别为（3.4±1.2）°和（3.6 ±0.8）°。共有5例患者在末次随访时出现置换节段假体周围异位骨化，发生率21.7%。结论 DISCOVER人工颈椎间盘置换术治疗颈椎病存在一定的异位骨化发生率，与文献报道相符，术者应有意识地预防异位骨化的发生以避免置换节段的活动度丢失。

关键词: 颈椎病, 人工颈椎间盘, 异位骨化

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the cause of heterotopic ossification of Discover artificial cervical disc replacement in the treatment of cervical vertebra disease and to explore preventive countermeasures. Methods We retrospectively reviewed radiographic and clinical outcomes in 23 patients who received the Discover cervical disc prosthesis. Static and dynamic X ray was taken for measurement of the range of motion. Replacement segment was assessed for heterotopic ossifications at the latest follow-up according to McAfee classification method. Results 23 patients were followed up for 27~36 months. In the last follow-up, the average sagittal range of motion was 5.5°±2.2°，and the average coronal range of motion was 3.4°±1.2° and 3.6°±0.8°. A total of 5 patientsdemonstrated the prosthesis replacement segmental heterotopic ossification at the last follow-up, the incidence being 21.7%. Conclusions heterotopic ossification can occur after DISCOVER artificial cervical disc replacement in the treatment of cervical spondylosis; the incidence is consistent with the literature report; the surgeon should try consciously to prevent the occurrence of heterotopic ossification in order to avoid the loss of the mobility of the replacement segment.

Key words: Cervical spondylosis, Artificial intervertebral disc, Heterotopic ossification

梁英杰,张光明,温世锋,郭东明,徐中和,刘恩志,钟润泉,肖文德,尹庆水. Discover人工颈椎间盘置换术后异位骨化的临床研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2015, 33(3): 336-340.

参考文献

[1] 袁文．颈椎固定融合存在的问题和进展[J]．中国脊柱脊髓杂志，2002，12：327．
[2] 吴李闯，何齐芳，王伟，等.颈椎动态稳定器置入治疗颈椎病近期临床疗效[J].临床骨科杂志，2012,15（6）：615-617.
[3] Mehren C．Mayer HM．Artifical cervical disc replacement and update[J]．Neurol India，2005，53(4)：440-444．
[4] Nabhan A，Ahlhelm F，Shariat K，et a1．The ProDiscisc prothesis clinical and radiological experience 1 year after surgery[J]．Spine，2007，32(8)：1935-1941．
[5] McAfee PC．The indications for lumbar and cervical disc replacement[J]．Spine J，2004，4(6 Suppl)：177-181．
[6] Mununaneni PV．Robinson JC．Jr Haid RW．Cervical arthroplasty with the Prestige LP cervical disc [J]. Neurosurgery,2007,60(4 Suppl 2)：310-314．
[7] Kang KC，Lee CS，Han JH，et al．The factors that influence the postoperative segmental range of motion after cervical artificial disc replacement[J]．Spine J，2010，10(8)：689-696．
[8] Auerbach JD，Jones KJ．Fras CI，el a1．The prevalence of indications and contraindications to cervical total disc replacement[J]．Spine J，2008,8(5):711-716．
[9] Peng CW．Quimoa M，Bendn JA，et a1．Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and clinical outcomes after Prodisc-C cervical disc replacement[J]．Spine J，2009,9(7)：551-555．
[10]Kim SW, Paik SH，Castro PA，et a1．Analysis of factors that may influence range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty[J]．Spine J，2010，10(8)：683-688．
[11]Barbagallo GM, Assietti R, Corbino L, et a1．Early results and review of the literature of a novel hybrid surgical technique combining cervical arthrodesis and disc arthroplasty for treating multilevel degenerative disc disease：opposite or complementary techniques[J]Euro Spine J，2009，18(1)：29-39.
[12]McAfee PC，Cunningham BW，Devine J，et a1．Classification of heterotopic ossification(HO) in artificial disk replacement[J]．J Spinal Disord Tech，2003，16(4)：384-389．
[13] Sasso RC，Smucker JD，Hacker RJ，et al．Artificial disc versus fusion：a prospective。randomized study with 2-year follow—up on 99 patients[J]．Spine(Phila Pa 1976)，2007，32(26)：2933-2940．
[14]Mummaneni PV，Burkus JK，Haid RW，et al．Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion：a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]．J Neurosurg Spine，2007，6(3)：198-209．
[15]Dmitriev AE，Cunningham BW，Hu N，et al．Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty：an in vitro human cadaveric model[J]．Spine，2005，30(10)：1165-1172．
[16]Rousseau MA，Cottin P，Levante S，et al．In vivo kinematics of two types of ball-and-socket cervical disc replacements in the sagittal plane：cranial versus caudal geometric center[J]．Spine，2008，33(1)：E6-9．
[17]Anderson P A, Sasso R C, Riew K D. Comparison of adverse even between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis [J]. Spine, 2008, 33(12):1305-1312.
[18]Cao JM, Zhang YZ, Shen Y, et al. Complications of Bryan cervical disc replacement [J]. Orthop Surg, 2010,2(2):86-93.
[19]周非非，赵衍斌，孙宇, 等．单节段Bryan人工椎间盘置换术后异位骨化形成对置换节段活动度的影响[J]．脊柱外科杂志，2011，9(5)：279-282．
[20]Lee JH，Jung TG，Kim HS，et a1．Analysis of the incidence and clinical effect of the heterotopic ossification in a single—level cervical artificial disc replacement[J]．Spine J，2010，10(8)：676-682.
[21]Sola S，Hebecker R，Knoop M，et a1．Bryan cervical disc prosthesis three years follow-up[J]．Eur Spine J，2005，14(suppl 1)：S38．
[22]Leung C，Casey AT，Gofifin J，et a1．Clinical significance of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc replacement：a prospective multi-center clinical trial[J]．Neurosurgery，2005，57(4)：759-763．
[23]Mehren C，Suchomel P，Grochulla F，et a1．Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement[J]．Spine，2006，3l(24)：2802-2806．
[24]杨大龙, 申勇, 曹俊明, 等. 颈人工椎间盘置换近期并发症分析[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2008,18(4): 249-252.

Discover人工颈椎间盘置换术后异位骨化的临床研究

Clinical observation of heterotopic ossification after Discover cervical disc replacement

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王建华, 吴迪, 孙贺, 张义龙, 信丽丽, 李乐. 3D打印椎间融合器应用于颈椎病的临床疗效和矢状位平衡随访[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(3): 342-348.
[2]	邵玉普, 郑雪峰, 史本超, 丁自海, 赵庆豪. 颈椎间孔内口锚链韧带的形态和分布特征[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(5): 511-514.
[3]	朱正亚, 刘少喻. 机械力学刺激诱导韧带肌腱异位骨化形成机制的研究进展[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(2): 242-245.
[4]	闫慧博, 邓尚希, 黎庆初, 金大地, 刘则征, 程亮, 江剑. 单嵌片自稳型颈椎融合器在颈椎前路减压融合术中的应用#br#[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(5): 603-608.
[5]	吴洁石, 薛骏, 袁凤来, 赵鹏, 赵全明, 徐瑞生 . 颈椎单开门微型钢板固定在颈椎侧块置钉方法改进的解剖研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(5): 503-506.
[6]	李瑞峰, 于宝龙, 张沛, 吴一民, 贺永雄, 李文选. 脊髓型颈椎病与神经根型颈椎病合并颈性眩晕的手术疗效分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2020, 38(2): 217-220.
[7]	杜心如, 孔祥玉, 郭森, 马泉, 刘英东. 椎动脉与Ⅸ~Ⅻ脑神经毗邻关系的解剖及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2020, 38(1): 1-5.
[8]	陈加成, 袁峰, 许飞虎, 陆炜强. 颈椎椎间隙后缘骨赘的影像学测量与临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2019, 37(6): 623-626.
[9]	林楚华,李颖彬,李义凯. 脊髓型颈椎病伴大块椎间盘突出保守治疗1例及文献回顾[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2017, 35(3): 341-345.
[10]	蒲志超,马向阳,杨进城,夏虹,吴增晖,尹庆水,艾福志,王建华. 两种支撑体在脊髓型颈椎病椎体次全切减压融合术中应用的效果对比[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2017, 35(1): 78-84.
[11]	林永绥, 王春, 刘成招, 何海龙, 史国栋, 叶晓健. 颈椎动态稳定器在颈椎病治疗中的应用[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2015, 33(1): 97-100.
[12]	管俊杰, 张烽, 赵剑, 陈晓庆. 不同植骨融合方式对脊髓型颈椎病患者术后椎间高度的影响[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2014, 32(2): 214-216.
[13]	温世锋, 郭东明, 徐中和, 肖文德, 李菊根, 尹庆水. 微型钛板与锚定法颈椎单开门治疗颈椎病效果的对比研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2013, 31(3): 350-352.
[14]	张顺聪, 江晓兵, 唐永超, 梁德, 杨志东, 晋大祥, 姚珍松. CenterpieceTM微型钢板在颈椎单开门椎管扩大成形术中的应用—附14例报告[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2012, 30(3): 356-358.
[15]	顾红林, 张　烽, 金国华. 颈前外侧入路的应用解剖学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2011, 29(1): 17-20.