经皮椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰段A3型骨折的临床观察

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2016.04.018

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 444-449.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2016.04.018

经皮椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰段A3型骨折的临床观察

李晓冬¹，　王素伟¹，　阴洪²，　黄卫¹，　肖红卫¹，　黄盛佳¹

1.珠海市人民医院脊柱骨病科，广东珠海 519000； 2.第三军医大学新桥医院骨科，重庆 400037

收稿日期:2016-03-27 出版日期:2016-07-25 发布日期:2016-08-03
作者简介:李晓冬( 1981-)，男，广东揭阳人，主治医师，硕士，研究方向：脊柱微创与骨质疏松, Tel：0756-2158261, E-mail：lifdily@163.com
基金资助:
国家卫生计生委医药卫生科技发展研究中心医学科研专项课题(W2012ZT48)；珠海市卫生局医学科研课题（2013109）

The clinical observation about percutaneous pedicle screws in treatment of Type A3 thoracolumbar fracture

LI Xiao-dong¹, WANG Su-wei¹, YIN Hong², HUANG Wei¹, XIAO Hong-wei¹, HUANG Sheng-jia¹

1.Department of Spine and Osteology, the People’s Hospital of Zhuhai, Zhuhai 519000, Guangdong Province, China; 2.Department of Orthopaedics，Xinqiao Hospital，Third Military Medical University，Chongqing 400037，China

Received:2016-03-27 Online:2016-07-25 Published:2016-08-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　比较经皮椎弓根螺钉固定和开放式椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰段A3型骨折的临床疗效。方法　收集我院胸腰段脊柱骨折35例临床资料，所有病例均为没有神经症状，AO分型为A3型骨折。其中观察组18例患者，均行短节段联合伤椎经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定，对照组17例患者，均行开放式短节段联合伤椎椎弓根螺钉内固定。通过VAS疼痛评分、总体满意度评价、影像学随访（VBI评分、VBA评分、Cobb角）来比较两组临床疗效。结果　观察组的平均手术时间为(53±10)min，对照组的平均手术时间为(90±9) min（P＜0.05）。观察组术中出血量(56±17) ml，对照组术中出血量(331±149) ml（P＜0.001）。观察组在术后7 d的VAS评分显著低于对照组（P＜0.001）。术后随访VBI评分、VBA评分和Cobb角在两组中没有显著差异（P＞0.05）。结论　短节段联合伤椎经皮椎弓根螺钉固定是治疗胸腰段A3型脊柱骨折的优先选择之一，具有术中出血量少、术后疼痛轻、恢复快、手术时间短等主要优势，值得临床推广。

关键词: 胸腰段骨折, 短节段固定, A3型, 经皮椎弓根螺钉固定

Abstract:

Objective　To compare the clinical effects of type A3 thoracolumbar fracture percutaneous pedicle screws fixation and open pedicle screw fixation．Methods 35 patients who had AO classification type A3 thoracolumbar spine fracture and without neurological symptoms in our department were enrolled in the research.18 patients in the observation group accepted short segment combined with intermediate percutaneous pedicle screws fixation;17 patients in the control group accepted open pedicle screw fixation. The VAS score、overall satisfaction、radiographic follow-up （VBI score、VBA score、Cobb’s Angle）were compared between two groups with the clinical effect. Results The average surgical duration in the observation group(percutaneous pedicle screws fixation) was (53±10) min, in the control group(open pedicle screw fixation) was (90±9) min（P＜0.05）.The bleeding during the operation of the observation group was (56±17) ml, the control group was (331±149) ml（P＜0.001）. There was no significant difference in the VBI score、VBA score and Cobb’s Angle at postoperative follow-up (P > 0.05 )． Conclusion This research is showing that the short segment combined with intermediate percutaneous pedicle screws fixation is a preferred treatment of Type A3 thoracolumbar spine fracture，which has the advantages of less bleeding, light pain, quick recovery and short surgical duration.

Key words: Thoracolumbar fracture, Short segment fixation, Type A3, Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation

李晓冬,王素伟,阴洪,黄卫,肖红卫,黄盛佳. 经皮椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰段A3型骨折的临床观察[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2016, 34(4): 444-449.

LI Xiao-dong, WANG Su-wei, YIN Hong, HUANG Wei, XIAO Hong-wei, HUANG Sheng-jia . The clinical observation about percutaneous pedicle screws in treatment of Type A3 thoracolumbar fracture[J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Anatomy, 2016, 34(4): 444-449.

参考文献

[1] Verlaan JJ, Diekerhof CH, Buskens E, et al. Surgical treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature on techniques, complications, and outcome[J]. Spine, 2004, 29(7): 803-814.
[2] Rechtine GR, Bono PL, Cahill D, et al. Postoperative wound infection after instrumentation of thoracic and lumbar fractures[J]. Orthop Trauma, 2001, 15(8): 566-569.
[3] Kawaguchi Y, Yabuki S, Styf J, et al. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery[J]. Spine, 1996, 21(22): 2683-2688.
[4] Smith JS, Ogden AT, Fessler RG, et al. Minimally invasive posterior thoracic fusion[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2008, 25(2): E9.
[5] Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertazbein SD, et al. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries[J]. Eur Spine, 1994, 3(4):184-201.
[6] Fan SW, Hu ZJ, Fang XQ, et al. Comparison of paraspinal muscle injury in one-level lumbar posterior inter-body fusion: modified minimally invasive and traditional open approaches[J]. Orthop Surg, 2010, 2(3):194-200.
[7] 张伟, 李海音, 李杰, 等. 微创减压联合经皮固定与传统开放手术治疗伴神经损害胸腰椎骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2015, 25(5):420-426.
[8] Zdeblick TA, Sasso RC, Vaccaro AR, et al. Surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fracture[J]. Instr Course Lect, 2009, 58:639-644.
[9] Yang H, Shi JH, Ebraheim M, et al. Outcome of thoracolumbar burst fractures treated with indirect reduction and fixation without fusion[J]. Eur Spine, 2011, 20(3):380-386.
[10]Assaker R. Minimal access spinal technologies:state-of-the-art, indications, and techniques[J]. Joint Bone Spine, 2004, 71(6):459-469.
[11]Wild MH, Glees M, Plieschnegger C, et al. Five-year-follow-up examination after purely minimally invasive posterior stabilization of thoracolumbar fracture: a comparison of minimally invasive percutaneously and conventionally open treated patients[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2007,127(5):335-343.
[12]Wang HW, LI CQ, Zhou Y, et al. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation through the pedicle of fractured vertebra in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures using Sextant system: an analysis of 38 cases[J]. Chin J Traumatol, 2010, 13(3):137-145.
[13]Jiang XZ, Tian W, Liu B, et al. Comparison of a paraspinal approach with a percutaneous approach in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures with posterior ligament complex injury: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Int Med Res, 2012, 40(4):1343-1356.
[14]Rahamimov N, Mulla H, Shani A, et al. Percutaneous augmented instrumentation of unstable thoracolumbar burst fracture[J]. Eur Spine, 2012, 21(7):850-854.
[15]Kim KH, Kuh SU, Park JY, et al. What is the importance of “halo”phenomenon around bone cement following vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic compression fracture [J] ? Osteoporos Int, 2012, 23(10):2559-2565.
[16]Gelalis ID, Paschos NK, Pakos EE, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques[J]. Eur Spine, 2012, 21(2):247-255.
[17]Heintel TM, Berglehner A, Meffert R. Accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screws for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: a prospective trial[J]. Eur Spine, 2013, 22(3):495-502.
[18]Abumi K, Panjabi MM, Duranceau J. Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices. III: stability provided by six spinal fixation devices and interbody bone graft[J]. Spine, 1989,14(11):1249-1255.
[19]王洪伟, 李长青, 周跃, 等. 微创与传统开放附加伤椎经椎弓根螺钉内固定手术治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2010,20(2):112-116.
[20]王许可. 联合应用单向钉和万向钉经伤椎椎弓根内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的生物力学研究及临床评价[D]. 第三军医大学, 2013.
[21]张祥宇, 苏峰, 闫石, 等. 横连对椎弓根钉松动和脊柱稳定性的影响[J]. 中国医学科学院学报, 2015, 37(3): 285-289.
[22]王洪伟, 李长青, 周跃, 等. 脊柱骨折经伤椎椎弓根置钉附加横连短节段固定的稳定性测试[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2010, 20(9):745-748.
[23]王洪伟. Sextant微创经皮内固定系统在胸腰椎骨折中的应用及相关生物力学研究[D]. 第三军医大学, 2010.
[24]顾宇彤, 姜晓幸, 董健, 等. 经伤椎微创椎弓根钉内固定术治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折[J]. 中国骨与关节外科, 2014, (5):408-411.
[25]董智勇, 霍明昌, 范学辉, 等. 椎体强化椎弓根螺钉固定治疗骨质疏松性椎体爆裂骨折[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2011, (22): 6741-6744.

经皮椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰段A3型骨折的临床观察

The clinical observation about percutaneous pedicle screws in treatment of Type A3 thoracolumbar fracture

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0