中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 504-508.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2016.05.006

• 断层影像解剖 • 上一篇    下一篇

骨质疏松时股骨颈结构薄弱区影像解剖学观察及其临床意义

崔志刚1, 杜心如2, 孔祥玉3   

  1. 1.北京友谊医院平谷医院骨科,  北京   平谷    101200; 2.首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院骨科,  北京100020;
    3.承德医学院解剖学教研室,  河北   承德    067000
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-19 出版日期:2016-09-25 发布日期:2016-10-14
  • 通讯作者: 杜心如,教授,Tel:(010)85231703,E-mail:duxinru@163.com
  • 作者简介:崔志刚(1980-),男,医学硕士,研究方向:脊柱外科,Tel:18513621217,E-mail:20110513com@sina.com

Radiological anatomy of the structural weak region in the femoral neck in the osteoporosis and its clinical significance

CUI Zhi-gang1, DU Xin-ru2, KONG Xiang-yu3   

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Youyi Pinggu District  Hospital, Beijing Pinggu 101200; 2. Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing  Chaoyang Hospital,Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020; 3. Department of Anatomy, Chengde Medical  University, Chengde, Hebei 067000,  Chna
  • Received:2015-08-19 Online:2016-09-25 Published:2016-10-14

摘要:

目的 探讨骨质疏松时股骨颈部位是否存在结构薄弱区。  方法 股骨颈 X片159例,观察由主压力、主张力与次压力骨小梁形成的斜“V”形结构薄弱区。 按Singh指数评估骨质疏松程度与结构薄弱区之间的关系。另收集10例股骨干燥标本按横断面、冠状面及矢状面观察内部骨小梁走行及薄弱区特点。 部分老年股骨颈骨折三维CT观察股骨颈内部骨小梁走行。  结果 Singh 1级(7 /159), 无“V”形薄弱区;Singh 2级(23/159),V形薄弱区34.78%; Singh 3级(42 /159),“V”形薄弱区85.71%;Singh 4级(48 /159),“V”形薄弱区75%; Singh 5级(27 /159),“V”形薄弱区29.63%;Singh 6级(12 /159),无薄弱区。横断面WARD三角底边为不连续主张力骨小梁;冠状面WARD三角形成斜向后外的“V”形薄弱区;矢状位WARD三角底边顶部在股骨颈滋养孔密集区,形成 “V”形薄弱区。股骨颈三维CT内部骨小梁走行与干燥骨剖面内部小梁走行一致。  结论 Singh 1、2级骨折倾向于头下型。 Singh 3、4级骨折倾向于头颈型。Singh 5、6级不易发生股骨颈骨折。

关键词: 股骨颈, 结构薄弱区, 解剖

Abstract:

Objective The purpose of the study was to observe a structural weak region in the femoral neck in the osteoporosis. Methods 159 dry femur specimen were collected for this study for identification of the "V"-shaped weak region of trabeculae in the femoral neck. The degree of osteoporosis of the femoral neck specimens were classified according to the Singh index grading. The relationship between the Singh index grading and the "V"-shaped weak region of the neck was assessed. 10 femur neck samples were sectioned in transversal, coronal and sagittal plane for identifying the position of the trabeculae and the "V"-shaped weak region. Femoral neck three-dimensional CT reconstruction was used for identifying bone trabecular contorts.    Results Singh index 1 (7/159), no of them have the "V"-shaped weak region; as Singh index 2 (23/159), 34.78% of them have the "V"-shaped weak region; as Singh index 3 (42/159), 85.71% of them have the "V"-shaped weak region; as Singh index 4 (48/159), 75% of them have the "V"-shaped weak region; as Singh index 5 (27/159), 29.63% of them have the "V"-shaped weak region. There was not the "V"-shaped weak region of the neck in the Singh index 6. The main pressure trabeculae, the main tension trabeculae, and the minor pressure trabecular bone consisted of WARD triangle in the coronal view, when the main tension trabecular disrupting or missing in osteoporosis, the "V" –shaped weak region is obvious.  Conclusions Singh index 1-2 is prone to subcapital femoral neck fracture; In Singh index 3-4 tends to produce typical type of femoral neck fracture; In Singh index 5-6, femoral neck fracture is not easy to take place.

Key words: Femoral neck, Structural weak region, Radiological anatomy