Suture Endobutton与跖肌腱重建Lisfranc韧带的生物力学对比研究

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2018.02.018

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 211-215.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2018.02.018

Suture Endobutton与跖肌腱重建Lisfranc韧带的生物力学对比研究

徐世明^1,2，　蔡慧²，　邓子文²，　郭春丽²，　孙大炜²，　卓日波²，　黄东^1,2

1. 南方医科大学第三临床医学院，广州 510630；　2. 广东省第二人民医院创伤外科，广州 510317

收稿日期:2017-11-21 出版日期:2018-03-25 发布日期:2018-05-04
通讯作者: 黄东，教授，主任医师，博士生导师，E-mail：dong-177@163.com；孙大炜，副主任医师，医学博士，E-mail：moonlitea@qq.com
作者简介:徐世明（1991-），男，福建漳州人，在读硕士，研究方向：创伤修复与重建，E-mail：619209501@qq.com
基金资助:
广东省医学科研基金（A2016007）

Biomechanical comparison of Lisfranc ligament reconstruction with suture endobutton and plantaris tendon

XU Shi-ming¹，CAI Hui²，DENG Zi-wen²，GUO Chun-li²，SUN Da-wei²，ZHUO Ri-bo², HUANG Dong ^1,2

1.The Third School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China; 2.Department of Traumatic Surgery, Guangdong NO.2 Provincial People´s Hospital, Guangzhou 510317, China

Received:2017-11-21 Online:2018-03-25 Published:2018-05-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　通过Suture Endobutton与跖肌腱重建Lisfranc韧带的生物力学对比研究，评价两种方法对恢复Lisfranc关节稳定性的作用，为临床治疗Lisfranc损伤提供理论依据。方法　选取10例成人新鲜尸体小腿标本，依次制备Lisfranc韧带完整模型、损伤模型及损伤后的Suture Endobutton 或跖肌腱重建模型，并分别给予轴向或外展载荷，记录内侧楔骨（C1）~第2跖骨（M2）基底的平均位移变化。结果　轴向载荷和外展载荷下，完整模型C1~M2的平均位移变化分别为（0.70±0.05）mm、（1.21±0.10）mm，损伤模型为（1.59±0.07）mm、（3.73±0.11）mm，Suture Endobutton 重建模型为（0.84±0.04）mm、（1.29±0.06）mm，跖肌腱重建模型为（1.01±0.05）mm、（1.34±0.05）mm。轴向或外展载荷下，完整模型和重建模型C1~M2间位移变化明显小于损伤模型，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；重建模型的位移变化略大于完整模型，但差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；Suture Endobutton与跖肌腱重建模型之间位移变化相似，差异无明显统计学意义（P＞0.05）；任一模型外展载荷时的C1~M2位移变化大于轴向载荷。结论　（1）在恢复Lisfranc关节稳定性上，Suture Endobutton与跖肌腱的重建方法提供的生物力学强度相似;（2）相对于轴向载荷的位移变化，外展载荷的实验结果差异更加明显，推荐使用外展载荷进行Lisfranc关节相关力学试验。

关键词: Suture Endobutton, 　跖肌腱, 　Lisfranc韧带, 　生物力学

Abstract:

Objective　Biomechanical comparison of Lisfranc ligament reconstruction with suture endobutton and plantaris tendon was conducted to evaluate the effect of the two methods on restoring the stability of Lisfranc joint and to provide a theoretical basis for clinical treatment of Lisfranc's injury.　Methods　Ten fresh adult cadaveric calves were selected and the complete Lisfranc ligament model, the injury model, the suture endobutton and plantar tendon reconstruction model were prepared. The axial or abduction load was recorded respectively. The average displacement of the basement of the medial cuneiform (C1) to the second metatarsal (M2) changes was recorded.　Results　The average displacement of C1~M2 under axial load and abduction load was (0.70±0.05) mm and (1.21±0.10) mm in the intact model, (1.59±0.07) mm and (3.73±0.11) mm in the damage model, (0.84±0.04) mm and (1.29±0.06) mm in the reconstruction model of suture endobutton, (1.01±0.05) mm and (1.34±0.05) mm in the plantar tendon reconstruction model, respectively. The displacement of the intact model and the reconstruction model C1~M2 under axial or abduction load was significantly less than that of the injury model (P<0.05); The displacement of the reconstruction model was slightly larger than that of the intact model with no significant difference (P> 0.05). There was no significant difference in the displacement between the suture endobutton and plantar tendon reconstruction model (P>0.05); The C1~M2 displacement changes under the abduction load was more than those under the axial load in any model.　Conclusions　(1)The biomechanical strength provided by suture endobutton and plantar tendon reconstruction is similar in the regard of the restoration of Lisfranc joint stability. (2)Compared to changes in displacement under the axial load, the difference of experimental results under the abduction load is more obvious. Hence, it is recommended to use the abduction load Lisfranc joint mechanics test.

Key words: Suture endobutton, 　Plantaris tendon, 　Lisfranc ligament, 　Biomechanics

徐世明,蔡慧,邓子文,郭春丽,孙大炜,卓日波,黄东. Suture Endobutton与跖肌腱重建Lisfranc韧带的生物力学对比研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2018, 36(2): 211-215.

XU Shi-ming，CAI Hui，DENG Zi-wen，GUO Chun-li，SUN Da-wei，ZHUO Ri-bo, HUANG Dong. Biomechanical comparison of Lisfranc ligament reconstruction with suture endobutton and plantaris tendon[J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Anatomy, 2018, 36(2): 211-215.

参考文献

[1] Clare MP. Lisfranc injuries[J]. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 2017,10(1): 81-85.
[2] Weglein DG, Andersen CR, Morris RP, et al. Allograft reconstruction of the Lisfranc ligament[J]. Foot Ankle Spec, 2015, 8(4): 292-296.
[3] 文艺, 冯品, 张晖, 等. 同种异体肌腱与螺钉固定修复Lisfranc关节韧带损伤的生物力学比较研究[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2013, 44(2):222-225.
[4] Jain K, Drampalos E, Clough TM. Results of suture button fixation with targeting device aid for displaced ligamentous Lisfranc injuries in the elite athlete[J]. Foot (Edinb), 2017, 30: 43-46.
[5] Siddiqui NA, Galizia MS, Almusa E, et al. Evaluation of the tarsometatarsal joint using conventional radiography, CT, and MR imaging[J]. Radiographics, 2014, 34(2):514-531.
[6] Hatem SF. Imaging of lisfranc injury and midfoot sprain[J]. Radiol Clin North Am, 2008,46(6):1045-1060.
[7] Hu SJ, Chang SM, Li XH, et al. Outcome comparison of Lisfranc injuries treated through dorsal plate fixation versus screw fixation[J]. Acta Ortop Bras, 2014, 22(6):315-320.
[8] Deol RS, Roche A, Calder JD. Return to training and playing after acute Lisfranc injuries in elite professional soccer and rugby players[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2016, 44(1):166-170.
[9] Ly TV, Coetzee JC. Treatment of primarily ligamentous Lisfranc joint injuries: primary arthrodesis compared with open reduction and internal fixation. A prospective, randomized study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, 88(3):514-520.
[10]Reinhardt KR, Oh LS, Schottel P, et al. Treatment of Lisfranc fracture-dislocations with primary partial arthrodesis[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2012,33(1):50-56.
[11]Kura H, Luo ZP, Kitaoka HB, et al. Mechanical behavior of the Lisfranc and dorsal cuneometatarsal ligaments: in vitro biomechanical study[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2001,15(2):107-110.
[12]马双陶, 陈卫军, 王文生, 等. 跖肌腱移植的应用解剖[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2007, 25(3): 262-265.
[13]Cottom JM, Hyer CF, Berlet GC. Treatment of Lisfranc fracture dislocations with an interosseous suture button technique: a review of 3 cases[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2008, 47(3): 250-258.
[14]Panchbhavi VK, Vallurupalli S, Yang J, et al. Screw fixation compared with suture-button fixation of isolated Lisfranc ligament injuries[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2009, 91(5): 1143-1148.
[15]Kaar S, Femino J, Morag Y. Lisfranc joint displacement following sequential ligament sectioning[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2007, 89(10):2225-2232.

Suture Endobutton与跖肌腱重建Lisfranc韧带的生物力学对比研究

Biomechanical comparison of Lisfranc ligament reconstruction with suture endobutton and plantaris tendon

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	李笑予, 张磊, 付磊, 李东波, 汪国友. 三步接骨法治疗Sanders Ⅱ型跟骨骨折的有限元研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 65-70.
[2]	吴研飞, 马剑雄, 卢斌, 王颖, 柏豪豪, 靳洪震, 马信龙. CT后处理技术重建CT值与终板抗压强度的相关性研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 71-76.
[3]	张悦, 蔡兴博, 张必欢, 王斌, 徐永清. 全腕关节置换术后腕关节生物力学研究进展[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 112-114.
[4]	欧阳北平, 马向阳, 罗春山, 邹小宝, 梁栋柱, 陆廷盛, 陈啟鸰. 钉尾横连与棒-棒横连在后路寰枢椎固定中的生物力学对比研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(5): 588-592.
[5]	林文杰, 孙欣, 黄文华, 魏波, 林涛, 梁振明, 钟环, 张欣, 欧阳汉斌. 踝关节融合术后后足关节生物力学分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(2): 212-217.
[6]	童杰, 季伟, 黄志平, 周若舟, 房佐忠, 朱青安. 枕颈区后路柔性动态固定的生物力学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(3): 315-319.
[7]	仝铃, 许阳阳, 王一丹, 马渊, 王海燕, 李筱贺. 颈椎前路微型记忆加压合金板的有限元分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(3): 320-326.
[8]	余盛, 庞清江. 颈椎间孔韧带的解剖特点及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(1): 109-112.
[9]	童杰, 季伟, 黄志平, 周若舟, 房佐忠, 朱青安. 寰枢椎后路柔性固定的生物力学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(1): 72-77.
[10]	王高飞, 张珠峰, 魏壮. V-Y延长指背腱膜终腱止点重建术治疗陈旧性锤状指的生物力学实验研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(3): 330-335.
[11]	杨诚, 李祯, 廖坚文, 樊仕才, 杨健, 白晓春. 基于柠檬酸合成的新型可降解螺钉生物相容性和生物力学特性的研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(2): 182-186.
[12]	胡力达, 田广永, 徐飘, 林琼萍. 鼓膜-听骨链精细三维重建及谐响应有限元分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2019, 37(6): 680-685.
[13]	康永强, 　芮永军 . 2~5掌指关节屈伸活动中关节面应力分布的有限元分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2019, 37(3): 299-303.
[14]	李亮,徐永清,何晓清,李川. 三种内固定器械固定中足损伤的生物力学比较[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2019, 37(2): 179-184.
[15]	凌钦杰,林晖,谢普生,邓羽平,黄文华. 全腰椎非线性有限元模型的建立与有效性验证[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2018, 36(6): 662-667.