闭合复位髓内钉固定治疗同侧股骨干合并股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效与不愈合危险因素分析

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.2.17

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 211-215.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.2.17

闭合复位髓内钉固定治疗同侧股骨干合并股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效与不愈合危险因素分析

马志华，　付宏伟*，　陈晓华

青海省第五人民医院骨科，西宁 810007

收稿日期:2020-05-14 出版日期:2022-03-25 发布日期:2022-04-12
通讯作者: 付宏伟，主任医师，E-mail：124274544@qq.com
作者简介:马志华（1982-），男，西宁人，副主任医师，主要从事创伤骨科的诊疗工作，E-mail：chen2ed@163.com

Analysis of clinical efficacy and nonunion risk factors of closed reduction and intramedullary nailing in the treatment of ipsilateral femoral shaft with intertrochanteric fracture

Ma Zhihua, Fu Hongwei*, Chen Xiaohua

Department of Orthopedics, the Fifth People's Hospital of Qinghai Province, Xining 810007, Qinghai Province, China

Received:2020-05-14 Online:2022-03-25 Published:2022-04-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的　评估闭合复位髓内钉治疗同侧股骨干骨折合并股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效并分析造成骨折不愈合的危险因素。方法　回顾性分析2010年1月至2016年12月在我院行闭合复位髓内固定治疗同侧股骨干骨折合并髋部骨折的31例患者，男23例，女8例，年龄(46.4±15.7) 岁（21~73岁）。观察并记录股骨干合并股骨粗隆间骨折患者阻挡钉数量、手术时间、失血量、愈合时间、肢体短缩、髋关节HHS功能评分。对可能造成骨折不愈合的可能因素进行单因素及多因素分析。结果　所有患者随访时间12~48个月，平均随访时间20.1个月。对所有造成骨折不愈合的可能因素进行分析。阻挡钉数量和骨折类型具有统计学意义(P<0.05)，其余因素如损伤机制、手术时间等未见明显统计学意义(P>0.05)。对上述两因素进行多因素分析，阻挡钉数量(OR=2.845, 95% CI 2.164~3.741)和骨折类型(OR=3.388，95% CI 1.966~5.840)为独立危险因素。结论　阻挡钉数量少、股骨干粉碎型骨折是引起骨折不愈合的独立危险因素。闭合复位髓内钉治疗同侧股骨干合并股骨粗隆间骨折安全有效、可提高生活质量，值得临床广泛推广。

关键词: 髓内钉, 　股骨干骨折, 　股骨粗隆间骨折

Abstract: Objective　To evaluate the clinical efficacy of closed reduction intramedullary nailing in the treatment of ipsilateral femoral shaft fracture with intertrochanteric fracture and to analyze the risk factors for fracture nonunion.　Methods　A retrospective analysis was performed on 31 patients (23 males and 8 females, aged from 21 to 73 years old who underwent closed reduction and intramedullary fixation for ipsilateral femoral shaft fracture with intertrochanteric fracture in our hospital from January 2010 to December 2016. The intramedullary nail type, number of blocking nails, operation time, blood loss, healing time, limb shortening and hip joint HHS function score in femoral shaft patients with intertrochanteric fractures were observed and recorded. The possible factors of fracture nonunion were analyzed by single factor and multiple factors.　Results　All patients were followed up for 12 to 48 months, with an average of 20.1 months. Possible causes of fracture nonunion were analyzed. There were statistical significance in the number of blocking nails and fracture type (P<0.05), while there was no statistical significance in other factors such as injury mechanism, and operation time (P>0.05). Multivariate analysis was conducted for the above two factors. The number of blocking nails (OR=2.845, 95% CI 2.164-3.741) and fracture type (OR=3.388, 95% CI 1.966~5.840) were the independent risk factors. Conclusions The independent risk factors of fracture nonunion are the small number of blocking nails and the comminuted fracture of femoral shaft. Closed reduction intramedullary nailing in the treatment of ipsilateral femoral shaft with intertrochanteric fracture is safe and effective and can improve the quality of life.

Key words: , Intramedullary nail, 　Femoral shaft fracture, 　Intertrochanteric fracture

中图分类号:

R687.3

马志华, 付宏伟, 陈晓华. 闭合复位髓内钉固定治疗同侧股骨干合并股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效与不愈合危险因素分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(2): 211-215.

Ma Zhihua, Fu Hongwei, Chen Xiaohua. Analysis of clinical efficacy and nonunion risk factors of closed reduction and intramedullary nailing in the treatment of ipsilateral femoral shaft with intertrochanteric fracture[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(2): 211-215.

参考文献 11

[1]	Seong YJ, Jang JH, Jeon SB, et al. Characteristics and surgical outcomes of intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures associated with ipsilateral femoral shaft fractures treated with closed intramedullary nailing: a Review of 31 consecutive cases over four years at a single institution[J]. Hip Pelvis, 2019, 31(4):190-199. DOI: 10.5371/hp.2019.31.4.190.
[2]	Rana R, Patra SK, Khuntia S, et al. Traumatic posterior dislocation of hip with ipsilateral fracture of shaft of femur: temporary fixator-assisted reduction and final fixation with interlocking nail[J]. Cureus,2019,11(8):e5488. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5488.
[3]	Mohan K, Ellanti P, French H, et al. Single versus separate implant fixation for concomitant ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures: A systematic review[J]. Orthop Rev (Pavia),2019,11(2):7963. DOI:10.4081/or.2019.7963.
[4]	Rajasekaran RB, Jayaramaraju D, Palanisami DR, et al. Ipsilateral acetabular fracture with displaced femoral head and femoral shaft fracture: A complex floating hip injury[J]. Case Rep Orthop, 2018, 2018: 4937472. DOI: 10.1155/2018/4937472.
[5]	Puram C, Pradhan C, Patil A, et al. Outcomes of dynamic hip screw augmented with trochanteric wiring for treatment of unstable type A2 intertrochanteric femur fractures[J]. Injury,2017,48 Suppl 2:S72-S77. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1383(17)30498-9.
[6]	Singh NK, Sharma V, Trikha V, et al. Is PFNA-II a better implant for stable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly population ? A prospective randomized study[J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma,2019, 10 (Suppl 1):S71-S76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.02.004.
[7]	Zhang W, Antony XR, Decruz J, et al. Risk factors for mechanical failure of intertrochanteric fractures after fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA II): a study in a Southeast Asian population[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2020, 141(4): 569-575. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03399-2.
[8]	Radaideh AM, Qudah HA, Audat ZA, et al. Functional and radiological results of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) osteosynthesis in the treatment of unstable pertrochanteric fractures[J]. J Clin Med, 2018, 7(4): 78. DOI: 10.3390/jcm7040078.
[9]	Luan F, Wang W, Liu N, et al. Digital Assessment of the implantation angle of proximal femoral nail antirotation helical blade using CT three-dimensional reconstruction[J]. J Invest Surg, 2019, 32(2):111-117. DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1381788.
[10]	Compton E, Andras LM, Murgai RR, et al. Isolated femoral shaft fractures in children rarely require a blood transfusion[J]. Injury, 2020, 51(3):642-646. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.01.005.
[11]	Cheng T, Xia R, Yan X, et al. Double-plating fixation of comminuted femoral shaft fractures with concomitant thoracic trauma[J]. J Int Med Res, 2018, 46(1):440-447. DOI: 10.1177/0300060517720317.

[1]	邵牧, 罗俊浩, 吴永伟, 刘彬, 王超, 孙振中, 芮永军, 殷渠东. 外固定结合髓内钉固定的骨搬运技术治疗胫骨骨缺损临床疗效[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(2): 224-229.
[2]	陈亮, 胡定祥, 段超, 马晨曦, 邓川芬, 刘敏. 改良切口抗旋髓内钉置入术治疗股骨转子间骨折[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(3): 333-337.
[3]	牛国庆, 　吴峰, 　彭智浩, 　卢国良, 　霍志谦. 股骨粗隆间骨折PFNA内固定失效手术因素分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2020, 38(6): 728-734.
[4]	马海召, 冯新霞, 付宏伟, 马志华, 韩文林. 加长型骨水泥双动头假体伴钢丝捆扎治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2020, 38(5): 609-613.
[5]	戴海, 黄宗贵, 吴永祥, 毕振宇, 黎裕明, 徐应龙. 数字化仿真技术在股骨干骨折髓内钉固定术中的应用[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2020, 38(3): 327-330.
[6]	高怡加,黄枫,董航,曾志奎. 扩髓髓内钉联合交叉韧带重建治疗股骨干骨折不愈合的临床研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2016, 34(5): 577-580.
[7]	林周胜,江成,夏雄智,黎飞猛,孙鸿涛. 老年骨质疏松性转子间骨折PFNA内固定术后股骨近端几何结构的变化[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2015, 33(4): 472-474.
[8]	郑翔, 章莹, 单永兴, 谢会斌, 郭晓泽, 朱昌荣. 锁定加压钢板与交锁髓内钉固定肱骨投掷骨折的有限元分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2015, 33(2): 213-217.
[9]	周贤挺, 屠凯凯, 吴云强, 朱绍瑜, 柳维, 贺行文, 石成弟, 杨雷. 顺行肱骨髓内钉进钉点定位的应用解剖学[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2015, 33(2): 134-137.
[10]	董福, 张晟, 姜楠, 陈安富, 余斌. 西藏小型猪胫骨髓腔参数测量及临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2013, 31(1): 68-71.
[11]	潘西庆, 聂喜增, 张江礼, 王华军. 胫骨近端解剖结构对髓内钉进针点的影响[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2012, 30(6): 633-636.
[12]	田　冲, 张美超, 欧阳钧. 不同直径主钉及远端锁钉对交锁髓内钉力学性能影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2011, 29(1): 94-96.
[13]	欧阳振华, 黄建荣, 向绪金, 黄　斌. 带锁髓内钉在股骨干骨折翻修术应用研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2010, 28(4): 458-.
[14]	张　晟, 余　斌, 罗吉伟, 黄梦全, 黄华军. 股骨近端髓腔三维解剖测量[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2010, 28(3): 258-.

闭合复位髓内钉固定治疗同侧股骨干合并股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效与不愈合危险因素分析

Analysis of clinical efficacy and nonunion risk factors of closed reduction and intramedullary nailing in the treatment of ipsilateral femoral shaft with intertrochanteric fracture

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 11

相关文章 14

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0