数字定位结合3D打印经皮穿刺导板在股骨颈骨折内固定治疗中的应用

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2025.1.14

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 90-96.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2025.1.14

数字定位结合3D打印经皮穿刺导板在股骨颈骨折内固定治疗中的应用

何一波^1,3，罗张风²，田宇^1,3，蒋帅³，谢龙辉³，邵怡雯³，李莉³*，饶利兵^1,3*

1.右江民族医学院基础医学院，广西百色 533000； 2.湖南医药学院第一附属医院运动医学科，湖南怀化 418000；
3.数字解剖与3D打印临床转化怀化重点实验室，湖南怀化 418000

收稿日期:2024-09-02 出版日期:2025-01-25 发布日期:2025-01-22
通讯作者: 饶利兵，教授，E-mail：546434918@qq.com；李莉，高级实验师，E-mail:1264690163@qq.com
作者简介:何一波(1997-)，男，河北张家口人，在读硕士，研究方向：临床应用解剖学、数字解剖与3D打印研究，E-mail: heyibocc@163.com
基金资助:
湖南省教育厅科学研究重点项目（24A0766）；湖南省自然科学基金（2022JJ50292）；湖南医药学院教学改革项目（2021JG39）；怀化市数字解剖与3D打印临床转化研究重点实验室项目（2020R01）；横向课题：开放+桥基式3D导板在脑出血穿刺中的研究（2023hx02）；数字化三定式导向器在椎间孔镜手术中的应用研究（2023hx03）；湖南医药学院科研孵化库建设项目

The application of digital positioning combined with 3D printed percutaneous puncture guide plate in the treatment of femoral neck fractures

He Yibo^1,3 , Luo Zhangfeng² , Tian Yu^1,3 , Jiang Shuai³ , Xie Longhui³ , Shao Yiwen³ , Li Li ³* , Rao Libing ^1,3*

1.The School of Basic Medicine, Youjiang Medical University For Nationalities, Baise 533000, Guangxi Province, China; 2. Department of Sports Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Medicine, Huaihua 418000, Hunan Province, China; 3. Digital Anatomy and 3D Printing Clinical Translation Laboratory in Huaihua, Huaihua 418000, Hunan Province, China

Received:2024-09-02 Online:2025-01-25 Published:2025-01-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨数字定位结合3D打印技术，在股骨颈骨折空心螺钉内固定治疗中经皮穿刺导航模板的应用价值和临床效果研究。方法选取2022年至2023年间我院接受股骨颈骨折内固定手术的患者36例，随机分为3D组和传统组，每组各18例。传统组采用传统徒手置钉，3D组应用数字定位结合3D打印导板进行内固定手术。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、克氏针穿刺次数、术中X线曝光次数、影像指标和随访结果。结果 3D组的术中出血量、平均手术操作时间、术中X线曝光次数和克氏针穿刺次数均低于传统组（P<0.001），影像学评价显示，3D组螺钉间距、螺钉与股骨颈轴线夹角平均低于传统组，3D组螺钉分布面积比与螺钉至颈皮质距离高于传统组，差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05) 。两组患者术后随访住院时间、完全负重活动时间、骨折完全愈合时间及并发症发生情况，末次随访未见股骨头坏死病例，差异均无统计学意义( P>0.05)，随访术后1、3、6个月及末次随访Harris评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论数字定位技术结合3D打印经皮穿刺导板在股骨颈骨折内固定治疗中，可以显著提高手术精度和复位质量，减少手术时间、术中出血量、透视次数和克氏针穿刺次数。

关键词: 股骨颈骨折； , , 3D打印； , , 数字定位； , , 经皮穿刺导板； , , 内固定

Abstract: Objective To study the application value and clinical effect of digital positioning combined with 3D printed technology in the treatment of femoral neck fracture with screw internal fixation. Methods Thirty-six patients undergoing internal fixation for femoral neck fracture in our hospital between 2022 and 2023 were randomly divided into a 3D group and a traditional group, with 18 patients in each group. The traditional group used traditional freehand nailing, and the 3D group applied digital positioning combined with 3D printed guide plate for internal fixation surgery. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, times of K-wire puncture, intraoperative X-ray exposure times, imaging index, and follow-up results were compared between the two groups. Results The intraoperative blood loss, mean surgical operation time, intraoperative X-ray exposure times and times of K-wire puncture in 3D group were lower than those of the traditional group (P<0.001). The imaging evaluation result showed that the screw spacing, angle between screw and femoral neck axis in the 3D group were lower than those of the traditional group. The ratio of screw distribution area and the distance from screw to cervical cortex in in the 3D group was higher than those of the traditional group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There were no statistical differences in the length of hospitalization, time of complete weight-bearing activity, complete healing of the fracture, and occurrence of complications, no cases of femoral head necrosis at the last follow-up between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no statistical differences in Harris scores at 1, 3, and 6 months and the last follow-up (P>0.05). Conclusions Digital positioning technology combined with 3D printed percutaneous puncture guide plate in the treatment of femoral neck fracture internal fixation, can significantly improve the surgical accuracy and reduction quality, and reduce the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy times and number of Kirschner needle puncture.

Key words: Femoral neck fracture; , 3D printing; , Digital positioning; , Percutaneous puncture guide plate; , , Internal fixation

中图分类号:

R683.42

何一波, 罗张风, 田宇, 蒋帅, 谢龙辉, 邵怡雯, 李莉, 饶利兵. 数字定位结合3D打印经皮穿刺导板在股骨颈骨折内固定治疗中的应用[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 90-96.

He Yibo, Luo Zhangfeng, Tian Yu, Jiang Shuai, Xie Longhui, Shao Yiwen, Li Li , Rao Libing . The application of digital positioning combined with 3D printed percutaneous puncture guide plate in the treatment of femoral neck fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2025, 43(1): 90-96.

参考文献

[1] Jin Y, Yin B, Shu L, et al. Morphological characteristics of femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged population: a retrospective descriptive study[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2024,25(1):100.DOI:10.1186/s12891-024-07207-5.
[2] de Joode SGCJ, Kalmet PHS, Fiddelers AAA, et al. Long-term functional outcome after a low-energy hip fracture in elderly patients[J]. J Orthop Traumatol, 2019,20(1):20. DOI:10.1186/s10195-019-0529-z.
[3] Shaker F, Esmaeili S, Nakhjiri M T, et al. The outcome of conversion total hip arthroplasty following acetabular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2024,19(1): 83.DOI:10.1186/s13018-024-04561-x.
[4] Cai L, Zheng W, Chen C, et al. Comparison of young femoral neck fractures treated by femoral neck system, multiple cancellous screws and dynamic hip screws: a retrospectively comparison study[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2024,25(1):188.DOI:10.1186/s12891-024-07319-y.
[5] Wiseley BR, Shin ED, Kuhn GR, et al. Patient Satisfaction Following Non-Operative Treatment of Geriatric Hip Fractures: A Case-Control Study[J]. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil, 2024,15:1750985760.DOI:10.1177/21514593241273312.
[6] Song J, Kim Y, Kwon S, et al. Usefulness of intraoperative C-arm image intensifier in reducing errors of acetabular component during primary total hip arthroplasty: an application of Widmer's method[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2021,22(1):892.DOI:10.1186/s12891-021-04791-8.
[7] Hess S, Husarek J, Muller M, et al. Applications and accuracy of 3D-printed surgical guides in traumatology and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Exp Orthop, 2024,11(3):e12096.DOI:10.1002/jeo2.12096.
[8] Mendonca CJA, Guimaraes RMDR, Pontim CE, et al. An Overview of 3D Anatomical Model Printing in Orthopedic Trauma Surgery[J]. J Multidiscip Healthc, 2023,16:875-887.DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S386406.
[9] Wang J, Zhao Z, Liang H, et al. Artificial intelligence assisted preoperative planning and 3D-printing guiding frame for percutaneous screw reconstruction in periacetabular metastatic cancer patients[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2024,12:1404937.DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2024.1404937.
[10]Liebergall M, Ben-David D, Weil Y, et al. Computerized navigation for the internal fixation of femoral neck fractures[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, 88(8):1748-1754. DOI:10.2106/JBJS.E.00137.
[11]丁悦, 罗剑锋, 王臻, 等. 个性化3D打印导向器空心钉固定股骨颈骨折[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2020, 28(24):2213-2217. DOI:10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2020.24.02
[12]Chen Z, Chen F, Xu X, et al. Biomechanical analysis of a new cannulated screw for unstable femoral neck fractures[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2024,12:1382845. DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2024.1382845.
[13]Lin S, Shang J, Xing B, et al. Modified F configuration in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture: a finite element analysis[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2021,22(1):758. DOI:10.1186/s12891-021-04638-2.
[14]Zhu J, Deng X, Hu H, et al. Comparison of the Effect of Rhombic and Inverted Triangle Configurations of Cannulated Screws on Internal Fixation of Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly Patients[J]. Orthop Surg, 2022,14(4): 720-729. DOI:10.1111/os.13223.
[15]Zhang Y, Ren C, Yao M, et al. Biomechanical comparison of the therapeutic effect of a novel proximal femoral bionic intramedullary nail and traditional inverted triangle hollow screw on femoral neck fracture[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2024,19(1):359.DOI:10.1186/s13018-024-04770-4.
[16]Assink N, Meesters AML, Ten Duis K, et al. A Two-Step Approach for 3D-Guided Patient-Specific Corrective Limb Osteotomies[J]. J Pers Med, 2022, 12(9). DOI:10.3390/jpm12091458.
[17]Morgan C, Khatri C, Hanna SA, et al. Use of three-dimensional printing in preoperative planning in orthopaedic trauma surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. World J Orthop, 2020,11(1):57-67.DOI:10.5312/wjo.v11.i1.57.
[18]Fan B, Chen H, Sun Y, et al. Clinical effects of 3-D printing-assisted personalized reconstructive surgery for blowout orbital fractures[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2017,255(10):2051-2057.DOI:10.1007/s00417-017-3766-y.
[19]Yan L, Lim JL, Lee JW, et al. Finite element analysis of bone and implant stresses for customized 3D-printed orthopaedic implants in fracture fixation[J]. Med Biol Eng Comput, 2020,58(5):921-931.DOI:10.1007/s11517-019-02104-9.
[20]王思哲, 高海燕, 蓝孝全, 等. 3D打印导板辅助置入空心钉治疗无移位型股骨颈骨折的短期评价[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2021,25(36):5753-5758. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674⁃8573.2019.05.008
[21]王清泽, 罗明星, 曾帅, 等. 3D打印经皮手术导板在股骨颈骨折闭合复位空心螺钉内固定术中的应用[J]. 中国骨伤, 2023, 36(3): 209-215.DOI:10.12200/ j.issn.1003-0034.2023.03.003
[22]Schneider AK, Pierrepont JW, Hawdon G, et al. Clinical accuracy of a patient-specific femoral osteotomy guide in minimally-invasive posterior hip arthroplasty[J]. Hip Int, 2018, 28(6):636-641.DOI:10.1177/1120700018755691.
[23]Driessen MLS, Goessens MLMJ. Complications of implant removal after healed hip fractures[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2020,140(11):1745-1749.DOI:10.1007/s00402-020-03435-1.
[24]高峰, 吴晓峰, 徐锋, 等. 新型三维蜂窝导向器在股骨颈骨折经皮空心钉内固定中的临床应用[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2022, 36(1):65-70.DOI:10.7507/1002-1892.202107106
[25]中华医学会骨科学分会, 中国医师协会骨科医师分会, 中国中西医结合医师协会骨伤科医师分会. 骨科3D打印技术临床应用指南[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2024(12):787-795.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121113⁃20240130⁃00074

数字定位结合3D打印经皮穿刺导板在股骨颈骨折内固定治疗中的应用

The application of digital positioning combined with 3D printed percutaneous puncture guide plate in the treatment of femoral neck fractures

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	李海艳, 黎萌, 杜心如. 股骨头颈压力骨小梁与股骨颈后内侧骨皮质及股骨距移行处的形态学观察及临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 1-8.
[2]	安雷雷, 孔祥玉, 刘鹏飞, 张宾, 马真, 杜心如. 椎动脉V₃段与第2颈神经毗邻关系的解剖学观测及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 9-13.
[3]	尹都, 岑波, 陈阳, 戴黎明, 周军格, 胡飞. 扩大经鼻入路内镜下斜坡区解剖学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 14-17.
[4]	张凤珍, 尹兆正, 伊钰营, 李磊, 赵婧, 王星, 李琨, 李志军, 张少杰. 基于儿童连续薄层解剖数据集三维重建骶椎及其软骨的可视化研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 18-25.
[5]	谢思远, 林源洵, 张沄奡龙, 冯梓誉, 李义凯. 颈椎未成熟骺环的影像学观察[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 26-30.
[6]	王娟, 郭龙军, 滕佳岐, 陈玉昆, 贺文. 双肺下叶静脉解剖分型MSCT评价及临床应用探讨[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 31-39.
[7]	张磊, 唐湘宇, 姜璐, 杨思艺, 周鑫, 柳天宇, 汪国友. Kager脂肪垫的分类及其与后踝撞击综合征的关系[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 40-44.
[8]	陈永龙, 王伟, 陈炯灰, 张镇武, 李俊, 杨志超, 黄春明, 李小川. 退行性腰椎侧弯患者L3椎弓根形态变异及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 45-53.
[9]	赵婷婷, 宋爽, 石科, 李晓英, 李攀阳, 李宁宁. 食管癌中miRNA枢纽靶基因的鉴定和验证[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 54-62.
[10]	莫娟梅, 张顺荣, 李健, 王振宁, 唐伟智, 梁碧琦, 庞宇舟, 周建龙, 周韶璋, 黄国东. 壮药扶正方通过改善Lewis肺癌CD8⁺ T细胞耗竭提高PD-L1抑制剂疗效的机制研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 63-68.
[11]	王鹏, 张德宝, 张杨, 张海斌, 时嘉, 张少杰, 李树文, 吴一民. 自体黄韧带干预TGF-β1/Smad3信号通路抑制兔硬膜外纤维瘢痕形成的实验研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 69-75.
[12]	李伟君, 周沂, 吴建辉, 陈丽华, 刘海英, 翟丽东. TVT与TVT-O不同位置治疗老年女性压力性尿失禁的有限元分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 76-81.
[13]	许遵营, 刘晖, 徐维臻, 张金辉, 熊远飞, 庄平, 林金河, 吴进. 逆行与顺行胫骨髓内钉治疗胫骨远端关节外骨折的疗效对比研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 82-89.
[14]	刘龙奇, 史良, 王科大, 苏亦兵. 电生理监测显微手术治疗脊髓髓内肿瘤的手术效果及预后随访研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 97-101.
[15]	邓棕元, 陈崇, 梁国彦, 叶勇裕, 余正然, 余涛, 汪露通, 梁昌详, 昌耘冰. 铁死亡介导椎间盘退变的研究进展[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 102-106.