Dubberley B型肱骨小头-滑车骨折手术治疗方法的选择

谢晔, 孙晟轩, 沈光思, 周海斌

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2) : 212-216.

PDF(2691 KB)
PDF(2691 KB)
中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2) : 212-216. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2025.2.16
临床研究

Dubberley B型肱骨小头-滑车骨折手术治疗方法的选择

  • 谢晔,    孙晟轩,    沈光思,    周海斌*
作者信息 +

Surgical treatment for Dubberley Type B humeral  capitellum-trochlea fracture

  • Xie Ye, Sun Shengxuan, Shen Guangsi, Zhou Haibin*
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

 目的    探讨不同手术方法治疗Dubberley B型肱骨小头-滑车骨折的临床效果。  方法    采用回顾性病例系列研究分析2017年1月至2023年12月使用双螺纹螺钉(Herbert螺钉)或解剖锁定钢板(LCP)治疗的肱骨小头-滑车骨折患者136例,其中男性42例,女性94例。年龄30岁~78岁(平均54.2岁)。骨折按Dubberley分型:IB型65例,IIB型52例,IIIB 19型例。手术采用切开复位行单纯Herbert螺钉内固定或LCP固定。比较两种内固定方式的手术时间、末次随访时梅奥肘关节功能评分(MEPS)、肘关节伸屈活动度、前臂内外旋活动度以及并发症情况。  结果    患者术后获得随访10~46个月(平均28.6个月)。LCP组手术时间较Herbert组延长,差异具有统计学意义。术后患肢伸直角度、屈肘角度、前臂旋转功能Herbert组优于LCP组,MEPS LCP组较Herbert组低,差异不具有统计学意义。  结论    对于IB型,采用外侧或后侧入路,螺钉及钢板均可选择。对于IIB型以及IIIB型,后侧入路更具优势,钢板可提供坚强固定。

Abstract

Objective    To investigate the clinical effect of different surgical methods in the treatment of  Dubberley Type B humeral capitellum-trochlea fracture.    Methods    A retrospective case-series study was conducted in 136 patients with humeral cephalic and trochlear fractures treated with Herbert screws or anatomical locking plates(LCP) from January 2017 to December 2023, including 42 males and 94 females aged 30-78 years (mean 54.2 years). According to Dubberley classification, 65 cases were type IB, 52 cases were type IIB and 19 cases were type IIIB. Open reduction and internal fixation were used in all the surgeries, with Herbert screw fixation alone or screw fixation followed by anatomic locking plate fixation. The operative time of the two internal fixation methods were compared. At the last follow-up, the elbow function of the patients was scored using the Mayo Elbow-Performance Score, and the patients' elbow flexion range of motion, forearm internal and external rotation range and complications were recorded.   Results   Patients were followed up for 10 to 46 months (mean 28.6 months).. The operation time of LCP group was longer than that of Herbert group, and the difference was statistically significant. The Herbert group was superior to the LCP group in terms of postoperative limb extension Angle, elbow flexion Angle and forearm rotation, but the differences were not statistically significant. The postoperative MEPS of the LCP group was lower than that of the Herbert group, but the difference was not statistically significant.   Conclusions    For type IB, a lateral or posterior approach may be considered, with screw and plate options. For type IIB and Type IIIB, the posterior approach is superior and plate binding screws provide firm fixation.

关键词

肘关节骨折 /   /   / Dubberley /   /   / 切开复位内固定术 /   /   / 螺钉 /   /   / 钢板

Key words

Elbow fracture /   /   / Dubberley classification /   /   / Open reduction and internal fixation /   /   / Screw /   /   /   / Plate

引用本文

导出引用
谢晔, 孙晟轩, 沈光思, 周海斌. Dubberley B型肱骨小头-滑车骨折手术治疗方法的选择[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志. 2025, 43(2): 212-216 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2025.2.16
Xie Ye, Sun Shengxuan, Shen Guangsi, Zhou Haibin. Surgical treatment for Dubberley Type B humeral  capitellum-trochlea fracture[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2025, 43(2): 212-216 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2025.2.16
中图分类号: R683.41   

参考文献

[1]  Morrey BF, Adams RA, Bryan RS. Total replacement for post-traumatic arthritis of the elbow[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1991,73(4):607-612. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B4.2071644.
[2]  Ring D, Jupiter JB, Gulotta L. Articular fractures of the distal part of the humerus[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2003, 85-A(2):232-238. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200302000-00008
[3]  Dubberley JH, Fabor KJ, MacDermid JC, et a1.Outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of capitellar and trochlear fractures [J].J Bone Joint Surg (Am),2006, 88(1):46 -54. DOI:10.2106/JBJS.D.02954
[4]  Mighell M, Virani NA, Shannon R, et al. Large coronal shear fractures of the capitellum and trochlea treated with headless compression screws[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2010, 19(1):38-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.012.
[5]  Watts AC, Morris A, Robinson CM. Fractures of humeral articular surface[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br,2007,89 (4):510-515. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B4.18284.
[6]  Bilsel K, Atalar AC, Erdil M, et al. Coronal plane fractures of the distal humerus involving the capitellum and trochlea treated with open reduction internal fixation[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2013,133(6):797-804. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-013-1718-5. 
[7]  Sano S, Rokkaku T, Saito S, et al. Herbert screw fixation of capitellar fractures[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2005,14 (3):307-311. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.005.
[8]  Pogliacomi F, Concari G, Vaienti E. Hahn-Steinthal fracture: report of two cases[J].ActaBiomed, 2005,76(3): 178-184. DOI:10.1067/s00512-02008000-09130-2
[9] Elkowitz SJ ,Polatsch DB, Egol KA, et al. Capitellum fractures: a biomechanical evaluation of three fixation methods[J]. J Orthop Trauma,2002,16(7):503-506. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200208000-00009.
[10]Luigi Tarallo, Michele Novi, Giuseppe Porcellini, et al. Surgical tips and tricks for coronal shear fractures of the elbow[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2020,6(3):402-413. DOI:10.1007/s00402-020-03500-9.
[11]Ravishankar MR, Kumar MN, Raut R. Choice of surgical approach for capitellar fractures based on pathoanatomy of fractures: outcomes of surgical management[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2017;27(2):233-242. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-016-1877-5 
[12]Lopiz Y, Rodriguez-Gonzalez A, , Marco F, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of coronal fractures of the capitellum in patients older than 65 years[J].  J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2016 ,25(3):369-375. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.12.004.
[13]Wagner FC, Post A, Yilmaz T, et al. Biomechanical comparison of biodegradable magnesium screws and titanium screws for operative stabilization of displaced capitellar fractures[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2020 ,29(9):1912-1919. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.02.009.
[14]Song Z, Wang Q, Ma T, et al. Anti-sliding plate technique for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus[J]. J Orthop Surg Res,2020, 17;15(1):18. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1466-5. 
[15]Yu T, Tao H, Xu F, et al. Comparison of lateral approach versus anterolateral approach with Herbert screw fixation for isolated coronal shear fractures of humeral capitellum[J].  J Orthop Surg Res, 2019,22;14(1):230. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1261-3. 
[16]Singh AP. Coronal shear fractures of distal humerus: diagnostic and treatment protocols[J]. World J Orthop, 2015; 6(11):867-876. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03500-9.
[17]Koslowskya TC, Zillekena C, Dargel J, et al. Reconstruction of a Bryan and Morrey type I capitellar fracture in a sawbone model with four different fixation devices: an experimental study[J]. Injury, 2012;43(4):381-385. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.12.004.
[18]Sajjad H, Asad A. Tahir Y. Humeral.Capitellar Fractures Fixation with Herbert Screws[J].PJMHS,2018,12(2):792-795. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-07065-7.
[19]Park JW, Kim KT, Sung JK, et al. Biomechanical comparison of inter-fragmentary compression pressures:lag screw versus Herbert screw for anterior odontoid screw fixation[J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc,2017;60(5):498-503. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2017.0202.011.  
[20]Barco R, Streubel PN, Morrey BF, et al. Total Elbow Arthroplasty for Distal Humeral Fractures:A Ten-Year-Minimum Follow-up Study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2017,99(18):1524-1531. DOI:10.2106/JBJS. 16.01222.
[21]Sharma S, John R, Dhillon MS, et al. Surgical approaches for open reduction and internal fixation of intra-articular distal humerusfractures in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Injury,2018,49 (8) :1381-1391. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.018. 

基金

江苏省卫健委老年健康科研面上项目(LKM202 2021);苏州市运动医学重点学科(SZXK202104)

PDF(2691 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/