下腰椎融合术后路单、双侧椎弓根固定的有限元比较研究

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2016.03.020

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 331-337.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2016.03.020

下腰椎融合术后路单、双侧椎弓根固定的有限元比较研究

王鹏¹，　王健¹，　胡勇¹，　陈海峰¹，　焦培峰²，　张美超²

1.南通大学附属建湖县人民医院脊柱外科，江苏建湖 224700；　2.南方医科大学人体解剖学教研室
广东省医学生物力学重点实验室, 广州 510515

收稿日期:2015-05-14 出版日期:2016-05-25 发布日期:2016-06-17
通讯作者: 张美超，副教授，E-mail：zmc@fimmu.com
作者简介:王鹏（1982-），江苏建湖人，医学硕士，主治医师，研究方向：脊柱外科，Tel：13921854727，E-mail：zynonly@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目（31200708,81171765）

Finite element analyses of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation plus interbody fusion in lumbar spine

WANG Peng¹， WANG Jian¹， HU Yong¹， CHENG Hai-feng¹， JIAO Pei-feng²， ZHANG Mei-chao²

1. Department of Spine Surgery，Jianhu People's Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University，Jianhu 224700，China; 2. Department of Anatomy, Southern Medical University，Guangzhou 510515，China

Received:2015-05-14 Online:2016-05-25 Published:2016-06-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　建立正常人L4~5节段椎间盘切除后单/双侧椎弓根螺钉固定椎间融合的有限元模型，对两者在不同运动载荷下的稳定性和应力分布进行比较研究。方法　通过正常人L4~5节段CT扫描获取断层图像，然后利用mimics软件重建人体L4~5三维模型，再通过Ansys软件前处理功能建立有限元模型，并在此基础上分别建立椎间盘切除后单侧（A）、双侧（B）椎弓根螺钉固定+椎间Cage融合模型，对两组模型分别施加5 N?m的前屈、后伸、左/右屈曲和左/右旋转载荷，比较分析椎体及植入物在不同工况下的位移及应力峰值。结果　各种工况下，A组在固定侧侧屈时椎体间位移及椎弓根螺钉应力峰值最大，在后伸时椎体应力峰值最大。B组在后伸时椎体间位移峰值最大，在旋转时螺钉及椎体应力峰值最大。在后伸和固定侧侧屈工况下A组椎体间位移峰值、螺钉及椎体应力峰值较B组相差最大。结论　与双侧固定相比，单侧固定融合术后在固定侧侧屈及后伸工况下发生不稳及螺钉松动、断钉的潜在风险最大。单侧固定融合术后的病人在椎间骨融合前应特别减少后伸及固定侧侧屈动作，以降低风险。

关键词: 腰椎, 双侧固定, 单侧固定, 应力, 有限元模型

Abstract:

Objective　To analyze biomechanical characteristics of pedicle screws and lumbar under different pressure loads between unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation plus interbody fusion after discectomy by creating a normal L4~5 spinal segment finite element model.　Methods　A three-dimensional finite element model was created by using CT sectional images of an intact L4~5 segment of a healthy male and then model A and model B were established. Model A was unilateral pedicle screw fixation plus interbody fusion after lumbar discectomy, and model B was bilateral pedicle screw fixation plus interbody fusion after lumbar discectomy. The lumbar variation, the changes of lumbar stress and the apex stress of pedicle screw under flexion, extension, left/right lateral bending and left/right rotation were observed in the two models.　Results　The maximum displacement and stress of pedicle screws in model A reached max under the operating models of fixed-side flexion，and the maximum stress of lumbar reached max under extension. While in model B the maximum displacement reached max under extension,and the maximum stress of screws and lumbar reached max under rotation. There was significant difference between model A and B under fixed-side flexion and extension. 　Conclusion　Compared with bilateral and unilateral fixation plus fusion, the possible potential risk of instability, screw loosening and metal breakage of unilateral fixation plus fusion was greatly increased. The movement of extension, fixed-side flexion and rotation should be reduced before bone union after unilateral fixation plus fusion.

Key words: Lumbar, Bilateral pedicle screw fixation, Unilateral pedicle screw fixation, Stress, Finite element model

王鹏,王健,胡勇,陈海峰,焦培峰,张美超. 下腰椎融合术后路单、双侧椎弓根固定的有限元比较研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2016, 34(3): 331-337.

WANG Peng， WANG Jian， HU Yong， CHENG Hai-feng， JIAO Pei-feng， ZHANG Mei-chao. Finite element analyses of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation plus interbody fusion in lumbar spine[J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Anatomy, 2016, 34(3): 331-337.

参考文献

[1] Untch C, Lin Q, Hart R, et al. Segmental motion adjacent to an instrumental lumbar fusion: the effect of extension of fusion to the sacrum[J]. Spine, 2004, 29(21):2376-2381.
[2] Kim DH, Jeong ST, Lee SS. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using a unilateral single cage and a local morselized bone graft in the degenerative lumbar spine[J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2009,1(4):214-221.
[3] Kronblum MB, Fischgrund J,Herkowitz H, et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis:a prospective long-term study     comparing fusion with pseudoarthrosis[J]. Spine, 2004, 29(7):726-733.
[4] Kronblum MB, Fischgrund J, Herkowitz H, et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study     comparing fusion with pseudoarthrosis[J]. Spine, 2004, 29(7):726-733.
[5] Hans W, Frank H, Hendrik St. Prospective design delineation and subsequent in vitro evaluation of a new posterior dynamic stabilization system[J]. Spine, 2009, 28(3):1774-1783.
[6] Fernandez M, Sala P, Ramfrez H, et al. A prospective randomized study of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis[J]. Spine, 2007, 32(4):395-401.
[7]   张国桥, 何仿, 张美超, 等. 腰椎后路椎间融合内固定有限元模型的建立及内固定物力学分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2014, 5(5):609-612.
[8] 徐海涛, 张美超, 李义凯, 等. 坐位旋转手法对腰椎内在应力的实时监测[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2005, 23(4):420-422.
[9] Vadapalli S, Sairyo K, Goel VK, et al. Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone(PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study[J].Spine, 2006, 31(26):E992-998.
[10]Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, et al. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion：review of the literature[J].Spine, 2004, 29(17):1938-1944.
[11]董健文, 邱奕雁, 赵卫东, 等. 单侧椎弓根钉棒固定单节段腰椎及其邻近节段生物力学的研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2010, 28(1):85-89.
[12]Balkan C, Charles C, René St, et al. Adjacent segment mobility after rigid and semirigid instrumentation of the lumbar spine[J].Spine, 2009, 34 (17):742-749.
[13]Kong HL, Wai MY, William Yeo, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion[J]. European Spine Journal, 2012,22(11): 689-698.
[14]James N, Weinstein, Tor D, et al.Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year resuLrs of the spine patient outcomes research trial[J]. Spine, 2010, 32 (14):1627-1641.
[15]Shah RR, Mohammed S, Saifuddin A, et al. Radiologic evaluation of adjacent superior segment facet joint violation following transpedicular instrumentation of the lumbar spine[J]. Spine, 2004, 29 (18):735-742.
[16]Potter BK, Freedman BA, Verwitbe EG, et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radio graphic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2005 ,18 (11):337-346.
[17]Tuttle J, Shakir A, Choudhri HF, Paramedian approach for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation. Technical note and preliminary report on 47 cages[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2006, 20 (17):E5.

下腰椎融合术后路单、双侧椎弓根固定的有限元比较研究

Finite element analyses of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation plus interbody fusion in lumbar spine

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	易红蕾, 陈虎, 王昕辉, 朱昌荣, 练沛荣, 夏虹. 不同体位腹膜后大血管及腰大肌的MRI影像解剖学差异[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(5): 511-515.
[2]	陈文锦, 张树军, 彭伟, 庄胤, 崔巍, 孙振中. 单侧双通道内镜下与经皮椎板间入路内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗L5/S1椎间盘突出症的短期临床疗效比较[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(5): 593-598.
[3]	林煜倩, 赵薇, 王建琳, 王玉娟, 余青泠, 饶利兵, 李莉. 个体化“三定式”导向器在椎间孔镜手术中的应用研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(5): 599-602.
[4]	何艾岭, 王清, 李广州. 骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者腰椎椎基静脉孔的CT影像解剖学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(3): 283-287.
[5]	梁昌详, 梁国彦, 郑晓青, 黄勇兄, 尹东, 昌耘冰. 胸腰椎爆裂骨折后路内固定术后椎体空洞形成的危险因素与疗效分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(6): 714-719.
[6]	李锐, 张仁赞, 刘正蓬, 孙贺, 张义龙. 不同融合方式对多节段腰椎椎管狭窄合并腰椎间盘突出症患者应激反应的影响#br#[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(5): 599-604.
[7]	陈波涛, 樊效鸿, 陈日高, 余洋, 蒋雷明, 李黔春. 电磁导航引导经皮椎间孔镜治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的临床研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(4): 460-465.
[8]	李鑫, 张国炜, 万江涛, 仇显帅, 张福, 戴景兴, 闵少雄. 术前低白蛋白血症与后路腰椎融合术后不良结局发生率的相关性[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(4): 485-490.
[9]	李锐, 许财元, 孙贺, 张义龙. 斜外侧腰椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症疗效及对患者氧化应激指标影响[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(4): 491-496.
[10]	王洪伟, 李铠湘, 王青云, 李锐冰, 刘晓强. 基于MRN技术的下腰椎Kambin三角的解剖学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(3): 267-270.
[11]	陈卿安, 钟涛, 赵博厚, 武钢 . 腹主动脉分叉解剖位置的影响因素[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(2): 138-142.
[12]	蒋官印, 欧云生, 朱勇, 罗伟, 杜兴, 张威, 秦万元. 颗粒植骨，钛网植骨和髂骨植骨在后入路单节段腰椎结核病灶清除术中的疗效研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(2): 204-210.
[13]	肖忠洲, 刘家明, 黄山虎, 刘志礼. 新型防神经根损伤双螺纹椎弓根螺钉解剖学依据[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(5): 507-512.
[14]	任婧, 万玲玲, 鲁峰, 陈曦航. 核纤层蛋白Lamin A/C负性调控ASCs增殖促进应力诱导脂肪再生的实验研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(4): 420-425.
[15]	吴晓薇, 李鉴轶, 杜冰冉, 杨巧华, 范天成, 李路韬. 轻度青少年特发性脊柱侧凸有限元模型构建及分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(4): 443-448.