中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 578-581.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2018.05.019

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征中短期疗效观察

李杰1,3, 李飞龙2, 冯文俊1, 曾建春1, 陈锦伦1, 曾意荣1   

  1. 1.广州中医药大学第一附属医院骨科,  广州   510405;    2.广州中医药大学第三附属医院骨科,  广州   510240
    3. 广州中医药大学第一临床医学院,  广州   510405
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-13 出版日期:2018-09-25 发布日期:2018-10-26
  • 通讯作者: 曾意荣,博士,主任医师,E-mail:liugeziliugezi@126.com
  • 作者简介:李杰(1985-),在职博士,医师,研究方向:骨与关节损伤, E-mail: lijzzz@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    广东省中医药管理局科研基金(20171088)

Short-medium outcomes of the head-acetabularplasty efficacy in the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with hip arthroscopy

LI Jie1, LI Fei-long2, FENG Wen-jun1, ZENG Jian-chun1, CHEN Jin-lun1, ZENG Yi-rong1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine; Guangzhou 510405; 2. Department of Orthopaedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510240; 3. The First Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of  Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China
  • Received:2018-03-13 Online:2018-09-25 Published:2018-10-26

摘要:

目的 探讨髋关节镜下行头臼成形术治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征临床疗效。  方法    回顾分析2012年1月至2016年12月收治的30例(30髋)股骨髋臼撞击综合征患者,其中男19例,女11例,左髋21例,右髋9例,年龄22~50岁,平均年龄34.91岁。根据分型分别于关节镜下行股骨头成型术、髋臼成型术以及髋臼成型联合股骨头成型术,患者术后均采用Harris评分评估临床疗效并随访研究。   结果    所有患者均获随访,平均随访时间43.2月(34~51月),术前Harris髋关节评分为(65.7±6.3)分,术后3、6、12个月及末次随访分别为(74.5±6.0)、(79.2±6.1)、(82.5±6.1)、和(83.1±8.2)分,与术前比较差异有显著性(P<0.05),术后1年内Harris评分持续改善差异有显著性(P<0.05)。  结论    髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征可有效消除或减轻髋部疼痛、改善关节活动功能,可成为治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征的良好选择。

关键词: 股骨髋臼撞击综合征,  髋关节镜,  临床疗效

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the head-acetabularplasty efficacy in the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with hip arthroscopy. Methods A total of 30 patients (30 hips) who were diagnosed as FAI between January 2012 and December 2016 FAI were retrospectively reviewed , which consisted of 19 men and 11 women at an average of 34.91 years old (ranging from 22 years old to 50 years old). According the types of impingement, there were three types among them, which include 18 cases of Cam, 6 cases of Pincer and 6 cases of both. Clinical outcomes were assessed through the Harris Hip Score (HHS) of per-and post-operation and postoperative follow-ups were also performed. Results All patients were followed up completely, the mean follow-up time in the arthroscopy group were 43.2 months (ranging from 34 months to 51 months). The preoperative HHS was (65.7±6.3), which was improved to (74.5±6.0), (79.2±6.1), (82.5±6.1) and (83.1±8.2) 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after the surgery and final follow-up, respectively. All the postoperative improvements were of statistical significance (P <0.05). No major complications occurred during perioperative period and follow-up, and no cases converted to total hip arthroplasty. Conclusions The hip arthroscopy procedure shows advantages of minimal invasion with certain efficacy of relieving pain, improving hip function and modified OA progression aimed to delay THA surgeries. Thus, we recommend that mini-invasive hip arthroscopy surgery might be an optimal procedure in treating FAI.

Key words:  Femoroacetabular impingement; Hip arthroscopy,  Outcomes