高龄女性自然周期和促排卵周期人工授精结局的比较

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.03.020

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的　比较高龄妇女自然周期和促排卵周期的人工授精结局并分析其影响因素。方法　回顾性分析580例高龄女性人工授精周期的临床资料，其中自然周期201例，促排卵周期379例，比较两者的成熟卵泡数、妊娠率、流产率等，并分析其受不同促排卵方案和不同不孕原因的影响。结果　自然周期与促排卵周期的生化妊娠率（8.45% vs 11.60%）、临床妊娠率（7.46% vs 10.29%）、异位妊娠率（0 vs 2.56%）差异无统计学意义（P>0.05），但自然周期流产率（8/15，53.33%）高于促排卵周期流产率（7/39，17.95%）（P<0.05）。不同促排卵方案的成熟卵泡数量，CC组（1.87±0.85）、CC+HMG组（1.80±0.75）高于LE组（1.29±0.53）、LE+HMG组（1.38±0.63）、HMG组（1.35±0.60）、rFSH组（1.35±0.48）（P<0.05）；临床妊娠率CC组（1/23，4.35%）低于其他组（P<0.05）；各促排卵组的流产率无统计学差异（P>0.05）。自然周期与促排卵周期患者各种不孕原因的临床妊娠率无统计学差异（P>0.05）。结论　高龄女性的自然周期流产率高于促排卵周期流产率; 高龄女性采取合适的促排卵方式可以提高宫腔内人工授精成功率。

关键词: 高龄女性, 　宫腔内人工授精, 　自然周期, 　促排卵周期

Abstract: Objective　To compare the pregnancy outcomes of intra-uterine insemination (IUI) in natural cycles and ovulation cycles of advanced age women and analyze the influencing factors.　Methods The clinical data and pregnancy outcomes of 580 IUI cycles in advanced age women were retrospectively analyzed, including 201 natural cycles and 379 ovulation cycles. The mature follicle number, pregnancy rate, abortion rate were compared, and the effects of different ovulation induction protocols and different infertility causes were analyzed.　Results　There was no significant difference in the biochemical pregnancy rate (8.45% vs 11.60%), clinical pregnancy rate (7.46% vs 10.29%), and ectopic pregnancy rate (0% vs 2.56%) between the natural cycles and the ovulation cycles (P>0.05), but the abortion rate of natural cycles (8/15, 53.33%) was significantly higher than that of ovulation cycles (7/39, 17.95%) (P<0.05). In different ovulation induction protocols, the number of mature follicles of CC group (1.87±0.85), CC+HMG group ( 1.80±0.75) were significantly higher than those of LE group (1.29±0.53), LE+HMG group (1.38±0.63), HMG group (1.35±0.60) and rFSH group (1.35±0.48) (P<0.05). The clinical pregnancy rate of the CC group (1/23,4.35%) was significantly lower than that of the other groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the abortion rate between those ovulation induction groups (P>0.05). There was no statistical difference in the clinical pregnancy rate between the natural cycles and the ovulation cycles (P>0.05).　Conclusions　The abortion rate of natural cycles of advanced age women is significantly higher than that of ovulation cycles. The appropriate methods of ovulation induction for advanced age women can improve the IUI live birth rate.

Key words: Advanced age women, , , Intrauterine insemination, , , Natural cycle, , , Ovulation induction

中图分类号:

R711.6

孙丽, 葛明晓, 邢卫杰, 蔡柳洪, 陶欣, 李小利, 欧建平. 高龄女性自然周期和促排卵周期人工授精结局的比较[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2020, 38(3): 343-347.

SUN Li, GE Ming-xiao, XING Wei-jie, CAI Liu-hong, TAO Xin, LI Xiao-li, OU Jian-ping. Comparison and analysis of pregnancy outcome of intrauterine insemination in natural cycles and ovulation cycles of advanced age women[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2020, 38(3): 343-347.

参考文献 18

[1]	Brandes M, Hamilton CJ, van der Steen JO, et al. Unexplained infertility: overall on going pregnancy rate and mode of conception[J]. Hum Reprod, 2011, 26(2): 360-368.
[2]	Kim D, Child T, Farquhar C. Intrauterine insemination: a UK survey on the adherence to NICE clinical guidelines by fertility clinics[J]. BMJ Open, 2015, 5(5): e007588-e007588.
[3]	中国医师协会生殖医学专业委员会. 高龄女性不孕诊治指南[J]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志, 2017, 37(2): 87-101.
[4]	Merviel P, Heraud MH, Grenier N, et al. Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination (IUI): an analysis of 1038 cycles and a review of the literature[J]. Fertil Steril, 2010, 93(1): 79-88.
[5]	刘作强, 吴日然, 程立子, 等. 3178周期宫腔内夫精人工授精临床结局及其影响因素分析[J]. 生殖与避孕, 2013, 33(2): 133-136.
[6]	Veltman-Verhulast SM, Cohlen BJ, Hughes E, et al. Intrauterine insemination for unexplained subfertility[J/CD]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2006, (4): CD001838.
[7]	Khalil MR, Rasmussen PE, Erb K, et al. Homologous intrauterine insemination. An evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of 2473 cycles[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2001, 80(1): 74-81.
[8]	Jasović V, Jasović-Siveska E. Success rate of intrauterine insemination in patients with unknown infertility[J]. Vojnosanit Pregl, 2012, 69(4): 301-307.
[9]	Bensdorp, Cohlen AJ, Heineman BJ, et al. Intra-uterine insemination for male subfertility[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2007, 7(4): CD000360.
[10]	Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Effectiveness and treatment for unexplained infertility[J]. Fertil　Steril, 2006, 86(5 Suppl 1): S111-114.
[11]	尹敏娜, 刘春林, 刘俊, 等. 自然周期与促排卵周期宫腔内人工授精助孕临床结局分析[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2015, 24(12): 1008-1013.
[12]	Steures P, van der Steeg JW, Hompes PG, et al. Intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation versus expectant management for couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis: a randomised clinical trial[J]. Lancet, 2006, 368(9531): 216-221.
[13]	罗小琼, 覃莉, 韦敬锡. 影响夫精宫腔内人工授精妊娠率相关因素的研究进展[J]. 右江医学, 2018, 46(6): 117-120.
[14]	宁小梅. 影响夫精宫腔内人工授精妊娠率的相关因素探讨[D]. 广州医学院, 2010.
[15]	Horcajadas JA, Riesewijk A, Polman J, et al． Effect of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF on endometrial gene expression profiles[J]. Mol Hum Reprod, 2005, 11(3): 195-205．
[16]	Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, et al. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfers in high responders[J]. Fertil Steril, 2011, 96(2): 516-518．
[17]	Hansen KA. What is new in polycystic ovary syndrome? Best articles from the past year[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 124(3): 630-632.
[18]	Legro RS, Brzyski RG, Diamond MP, et al. Letrozole versus clomiphene for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome[J]. N Engl J Med, 2014, 371(2): 119-129.