颗粒植骨，钛网植骨和髂骨植骨在后入路单节段腰椎结核病灶清除术中的疗效研究

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.2.16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的　比较颗粒植骨，钛网植骨和自体髂骨植骨在后入路单节段腰椎结核病灶清除术中的临床疗效。方法　回顾性分析本科2015年7月至2020年9月接受后入路单节段腰椎结核病灶清除 + 植骨融合内固定术的98例患者，其中32例自体髂骨植骨，32例钛网植骨，34例颗粒植骨。主要的观察指标包括：手术时间，术中出血量，术后住院时间，VAS评分（visual analogue scale，VAS），血细胞沉降率，C反应蛋白和美国脊髓损伤协会分级；次要参考指标：矫正和丢失Cobb角，植骨融合时间。记录所有参考数据并进行统计学分析。结果　术后平均随访时间为28月（14 ~ 53月）。颗粒组手术时间（192.6±42.2）min，植骨融合时间（5.2±1.1）月，均优于髂骨块组（229.2 ± 61.6）min，（8.0 ± 2.9）月和钛网组（233.1±51.1）min，（8.6±5.6）月，P<0.05。术中出血量颗粒组（385.3±251.8）ml，少于钛网组（660.9 ± 486.4）mL，P<0.05；与髂骨块组（534.4 ± 395.4）ml无统计学差异，P＝0.122。术后末次随访患者腰椎节段后凸Cobb角均较术前显著改善（P<0.05），丢失及矫正Cobb角各组间无统计学差异（P>0.05）。余指标3组间无统计学差异。结论　与髂骨块植骨和钛网植骨相比，颗粒骨植骨简单易行，手术时间短，术中出血量少，术后植骨融合快，应用于后入路单节段腰椎结核术中，是一种安全，有效的植骨方式。

关键词: 腰椎结核, 　后入路, 　内固定, 　植骨融合方式

Abstract: Objective　To compare the clinical outcomes of iliac bone graft, titanium mesh bone graft and granular bone graft in the surgical treatment of single segment lumbar tuberculosis.　Methods　A retrospective analysis was performed on 98 patients who underwent one stage posterior debridement, bone graft and internal fixation for single segment lumbar tuberculosis from July 2015 to September 2020, involving 32 case in autologous iliac bone graft group, 32 case in titanium mesh bone graft group and 34 cases in granular bone graft group. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), ASIA grade, Cobb angle correction and loss, and bone graft fusion time were recorded and analyzed.　Results　The average follow-up time was 28 months (14~53 months). The operation time and bone graft fusion time in the granular group were (192.6±42.1) min, (5.2±1.1) months, which were better than those in the iliac bone group (229.2±61.6) min, (8.0±2.9) months and titanium mesh group (233±51.5) min, (8.6±5.6) months (P<0.05). The amount of intraoperative blood loss in the granular group (385.3±251.8) mL was less than that in the titanium mesh group (660.9±486.4) mL (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the amount of intraoperative blood loss between the granular group and the iliac bone group (534.4±395.4) mL, (P=0.122). After operation, the Cobb angle of lumbar segmental kyphosis significantly improved in the three groups at the last follow-up, but there was no significant difference in loss and correction of Cobb angle among the three groups (P>0.05). There were no statistical difference in the other indicators among the three groups.　Conclusions　Compared with iliac bone graft and titanium mesh bone graft, granular bone graft has the advantages of simple and feasible operation, shorter operation time, less blood loss and faster postoperative bone graft fusion. It is a safe and effective bone graft method for single segmental lumbar tuberculosis via posterior approach.

Key words: Lumbar tuberculosis, 　Posterior approach, 　Internal fixation, 　Bone graft fusion methods

中图分类号:

R687

蒋官印, 欧云生, 朱勇, 罗伟, 杜兴, 张威, 秦万元. 颗粒植骨，钛网植骨和髂骨植骨在后入路单节段腰椎结核病灶清除术中的疗效研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(2): 204-210.

Jiang Guanyin, Ou Yunsheng, Zhu Yong, Luo Wei, Du Xing, Zhang Wei, Qin Wanyuan. Study on the curative effects of granular bone graft, titanium mesh bone graft and iliac bone graft in single-segment lumbar tuberculosis focus debridement by posterior approach[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(2): 204-210.

参考文献 19

[1]	Dunn RN, Ben Husien M. Spinal tuberculosis: review of current management[J]. Bone Joint J, 2018, 100-B(4): 425-431. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B4.BJJ-2017-1040.R1.
[2]	Khanna K, Sabharwal S. Spinal tuberculosis: a comprehensive review for the modern spine surgeon[J]. Spine J, 2019, 19(11): 1858-1870. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.05.002.
[3]	Boachie-Adjei O, Papadopoulos EC, Pellisé F, et al. Late treatment of tuberculosis-associated kyphosis: literature review and experience from a SRS-GOP site[J]. Eur Spine J, 2013, 22 Suppl 4(Suppl 4): 641-646. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2338-4.
[4]	Rajasekaran S, Soundarapandian S. Progression of kyphosis in tuberculosis of the spine treated by anterior arthrodesis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1989, 71(9): 1314-1323. PMID: 2793883.
[5]	李剑箫, 欧云生, 高永建, 等. 自体颗粒植骨与髂骨块植骨治疗单节段胸腰椎结核的疗效对比[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2018, 36(3): 333-337, 342. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2018.03.020.
[6]	杜兴, 欧云生, 朱勇, 等. 结构性与非结构性植骨融合治疗单节段胸椎结核的近期疗效[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2019, 33(4): 403-409. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201808095.
[7]	彭琪琪, 欧云生, 朱勇, 等. 后路病灶清除植骨内固定联合不同入路腰大肌脓肿清除局部化疗治疗胸腰椎结核[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2018, 32(7): 912-919. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201801068.
[8]	Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, McEnery KW, et al. Anterior fresh frozen structural allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Do they work if combined with posterior fusion and instrumentation in adult patients with kyphosis or anterior column defects[J] Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1995, 20(12): 1410-1418. PMID: 7676341.
[9]	Wang HW, Li CQ, Wang J, et al. Characteristics of patients with spinal tuberculosis: seven-year experience of a teaching hospital in Southwest China[J]. Int Orthop, 2012, 36(7): 1429-1434. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1511-z.
[10]	Xu ZQ, Wang XY, Wu P, et al. Surgical treatment for mono-segmental lumbar tuberculosis by single-stage posterior debridement, compact bone grafting and posterior single-segment ﬁxation[J]. Injury, 2015, 46(7): 1311-1316. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.03.023.
[11]	Yao Y, Zhang H, Liu M, et al. Prognostic factors for recovery of patients after surgery for thoracic spinal tuberculosis[J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 105: 327-331. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.167.
[12]	Liu JM, Chen XY, Zhou Y, et al. Is nonstructural bone graft useful in surgical treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis? A retrospective case-control study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2016, 95(35): e4677. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004677.
[13]	Liu CC, Lin L, Wang WX, et al. Long-term outcomes of vertebral column resection for kyphosis in patients with cured spinal tuberculosis: average 8-year follow-up[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2016, 24(5): 777-785. DOI: 10.3171/2015.8.SPINE15534.
[14]	Wang YX, Zhang HQ, Li M, et al. Debridement, interbody graft using titanium mesh cages, posterior instrumentation and fusion in the surgical treatment of multilevel noncontiguous spinal tuberculosis in elderly patients via a posterior-only[J]. Injury, 2017, 48(2): 378-383. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.12.025.
[15]	Chen Y, Chen DY, Guo YF, et al. Subsidence of titanium mesh cage: a study based on 300 cases[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2008, 21(7): 489-492. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318158de22.
[16]	Assaghir YM, Refae HH, Alam-Eddin M. Anterior versus posterior debridement fusion for single-level dorsal tuberculosis: the role of graft-type and level of fixation on determining the outcome[J]. Eur Spine J, 2016, 25(12): 3884-3893. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4516-2.
[17]	Gao YJ, Ou YS, Deng QX, et al. Comparison between titanium mesh and autogenous iliac bone graft to restore vertebral height through posterior approach for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(4): e0175567. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175567.
[18]	Blum B, Moseley J, Miller L, et al. Measurement of bone morphogenetic proteins and other growth factors in demineralized bone matrix[J]. Orthopedics, 2004, 27(1 Suppl): s161-s165. DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-20040102-17.
[19]	Li HS, Zou XN, Xue QY, et al. Effects of autogenous bone graft impaction and tricalcium phosphate on anterior interbody fusion in the porcine lumbar spine[J]. Acta Orthop Scand, 2004, 75(4): 456-463. DOI: 10.1080/00016470410001240-1.