踝关节融合术后后足关节生物力学分析

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2023.2.16

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 212-217.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2023.2.16

踝关节融合术后后足关节生物力学分析

林文杰¹，孙欣¹，黄文华^1，2，魏波¹，林涛¹，梁振明¹，钟环¹，张欣¹，欧阳汉斌¹*

1.广东医科大学附属医院骨科中心，广东湛江 524001； 2.南方医科大学基础医学院人体解剖学国家重点学科，
广东省医学生物力学重点实验室，广东省医学3D打印应用转化工程技术研究中心，广州 510515

收稿日期:2022-01-06 出版日期:2023-03-25 发布日期:2023-04-14
通讯作者: 欧阳汉斌，副主任医师，E-mail: robin85@163.com
作者简介:林文杰(1995-)，硕士研究生，研究方向：足踝外科、数字骨科，E-mail: 704185800@qq.com；共同第一作者：孙欣(1979-)，主任医师，研究方向：数字骨科，E-mail: sunxin20088@126.com
基金资助:
广东省医学科研基金项目（B2021213）；广东省科技计划项目（2018B090944002）；湛江市科技发展专项资金竞争性分配项目（2020A01025）；广东医科大学大学生创新实验项目（FYZY001）

Biomechanical analysis of hindfoot joint after ankle arthrodesis

Lin Wenjie¹，Sun Xin¹，Huang Wenhua^{1, 2}，Wei Bo¹，Lin Tao¹，Liang Zhenming¹，Zhong Huan¹，Zhang Xin¹， Ouyang Hanbin¹*

1. Department of Orthopedics Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524001, China; 2. Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Translation of Medical 3D Printing Application, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Biomechanics, National Key Discipline of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China

Received:2022-01-06 Online:2023-03-25 Published:2023-04-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨踝关节融合术后后足关节的生物力学特性。方法利用健康成年男性志愿者右踝关节CT图像，构建踝关节融合前的三维有限元模型，在此基础上模拟踝关节融合术后骨性融合状态，采用中立、外旋、内旋、背伸和跖屈的5种载荷工况分别对融合前、后模型组进行有限元分析，评估踝关节融合前后的整体刚度变化、距下关节和距舟关节的接触力学特性变化。结果踝关节发生骨性融合后，整体结构刚度较融合前模型显著增高；除中立位工况以外，融合后的距下关节的接触面积均有所减少，距舟关节接触面积则有所增加；而融合后的距下和距舟关节的接触应力在各工况下总体呈降低趋势。结论踝关节骨性融合术后相邻关节的接触特性改变可能是足部整体结构刚度提高后承载模式发生变化的结果，其与相邻后足关节退行性改变之间的关联尚有待进一步研究证实。

关键词: 踝关节创伤性关节炎, , , 踝关节融合术, , , 后足关节, , , 有限元分析, , , 生物力学

Abstract: Objective To investigate the biomechanical characteristics of hindfoot joint after ankle arthrodesis. Methods Based on the CT images of the right ankle of healthy adult male volunteers, a three-dimensional finite element model of the normal ankle was constructed. On this basis, the bony fusion after ankle arthrodesis was simulated. Five load cases of neutral, external rotation, internal rotation, dorsiflexion， and plantar flexion were used to analyze the model group before and after fusion, and to evaluate the changes of overall stiffness and the contact mechanical characteristics of subtalar joint and talonavicular joint before and after ankle arthrodesis. Results After ankle arthrodesis, the overall structural stiffness was significantly higher than that of the model before fusion. Except for neutral condition, the contact area of subtalar joint after fusion decreased, while the contact area of talonavicular joint increased. The contact stress of subtalar joint and talonavicular joint after fusion generally showed a downward trend under various working conditions. Conclusions The change of contact characteristics of adjacent joints after ankle arthrodesis may be the result of the change of bearing mode after the improvement of the overall structural stiffness of the foot, and its association with the degenerative changes of adjacent hindfoot joints needs to be confirmed by further research.

Key words: Traumatic arthritis of ankle, , , Ankle arthrodesis, , , Hindfoot joint, , , Finite element analysis, , , Biomechanics

中图分类号:

R318.01
R687

林文杰, 孙欣, 黄文华, 魏波, 林涛, 梁振明, 钟环, 张欣, 欧阳汉斌. 踝关节融合术后后足关节生物力学分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(2): 212-217.

Lin Wenjie, Sun Xin, Huang Wenhua, Wei Bo, Lin Tao, Liang Zhenming, Zhong Huan, Zhang Xin, Ouyang Hanbin. Biomechanical analysis of hindfoot joint after ankle arthrodesis[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(2): 212-217.

参考文献 20

[1]	Saltzman CL, Salamon ML, Blanchard GM, et al. Epidemiology of ankle arthritis: report of a consecutive series of 639 patients from a tertiary orthopaedic center[J]. Iowa Orthop J, 2005, 25(19): 44–46. PMID: 16089071
[2]	Hautmann MG, Hipp M, Neumaier U, et al. Radiotherapy for osteoarthritis of the ankle and tarsal joints-analysis of 66 joints[J]. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie,2020,196(6): 569-575. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-019-01551-5.
[3]	Fuentes-Sanz A, Moya-Angeler J, López-Oliva F, et al. Clinical Outcome and Gait Analysis of Ankle Arthrodesis[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2012, 33(10): 819-827. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0819.
[4]	Coester LM, Saltzman CL, Leupold J, et al. Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001, 83(2): 219-28. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200102000-00009.
[5]	金乾坤,何盛为,何飞熊,等.足踝部三维有限元仿真模型的构建及验证[J].中国数字医学,2016, 11(4): 83-86. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7571.2016.04.029.
[6]	Ramlee MH, Gan HS, Daud SA, et al. Stress distributions and micromovement of fragment bone of pilon fracture treated with external fixator: a finite element analysis[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2020, 59(4): 664-672. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.09.006.
[7]	刘忠鑫,王维,张欣,等.螺钉固定与Tight-rope固定治疗下胫腓前联合损伤的初步有限元分析[J].中国骨伤, 2018, 31(10): 937-943. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.10.012.
[8]	Wang S, Yu J, Ma X, et al. Finite element analysis of the initial stability of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis with three-screw fixation: posteromedial versus posterolateral home-run screw[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2020, 15(1): 252. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01767-7.
[9]	Anderson DD, Goldsworthy JK, et al. Physical validation of a patient-specific contact finite element model of the ankle[J]. J Biomech, 2007, 40(8): 1662-1669. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.01.024
[10]	Schuh R, Hofstaetter JG, Hofstaetter SG, et al. Plantar pressure distribution after tibiotalar arthrodesis[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2011, 26(6): 620-625. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.02.001.
[11]	Sturnick DR, Demetracopoulos CA, Ellis SJ, et al. Adjacent joint kinematics after ankle arthrodesis during cadaveric gait simulation[J].Foot Ankle Int, 2017,38(11): 1249-1259.DOI: 10.1177/107110071 7726806.
[12]	俞光荣, 杨云峰, 张凯, 等. 距下关节、踝关节对后足运动影响的实验研究[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2005, 25(4): 236-239. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn:0253-2352.2005.04.012.
[13]	Sealey RJ, Myerson MS, Molloy A, et al. Sagittal plane motion of the hindfoot following ankle arthrodesis: a prospective analysis[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2009, 30(3): 187-96. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2009.0187.
[14]	Bruening DA, Cooney TE, Ray MS, et al. Multisegment foot kinematic and kinetic compensations in level and uphill walking following tibiotalar arthrodesis[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2016, 37(10): 1119-1129. DOI: 10.1177/1071100716655205.
[15]	燕晓宇,俞光荣,丁祖泉,等.距舟关节的三维运动度及其临床意义[J].中国临床解剖学杂志, 2007, 25(6): 693-695. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-165X.2007.06.024.
[16]	Wayne JS, Lawhorn KW, Davis KE, et al. The effect of tibiotalar fixation on foot biomechanics[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 1997, 18(12):792-797. DOI: 10.1177/107110079701801207.
[17]	Jung HG, Parks BG, Nguyen A, et al. Effect of tibiotalar joint arthrodesis on adjacent tarsal joint pressure in a cadaver model[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2007, 28(1): 103-108. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0019.
[18]	Wang Y, Li Z, Wong DW, Zhang M. Effects of ankle arthrodesis on biomechanical performance of the entire foot [J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(7): e0134340. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134340.
[19]	Jones CR, Wong E, Applegate GR, et al. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: a 2-15year follow-up study[J]. Arthroscopy, 2018, 34(5): 1641-1649. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.11.031.
[20]	Ling JS, Smyth NA, Fraser EJ, et al. Investigating the relationship between ankle arthrodesis and adjacent-joint arthritis in the hindfoot: a systematic review[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2015, 97(6): 513-520. PMID: 25948528.

踝关节融合术后后足关节生物力学分析

Biomechanical analysis of hindfoot joint after ankle arthrodesis

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	江剑宏, 段仁鹏, 李晓锋. 国人胆道三维重建解剖变异应用研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 1-4.
[2]	郭红志, 王瑜, 张加琪, 梁海彬, 马梓玮, 冯伟, 吴忧, 司子燚. 血管铸型结合CT三维模型评估先兆子痫胎盘血管结构[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 5-10.
[3]	李佳伟, 张静, 李灿然, 兰文杰, 籍庆余, 郭志勇, 张云凤, 刘启, 陈清威, 李筱贺. 蒙古族人群股骨近端解剖参数X线测量[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 11-16.
[4]	李琨, 张燕, 郭冉, 郝咪咪, 吴轩宇, 徐艺芳, 王超群, 马文童, 张灵淇, 杨宏宇, 李志军, 张少杰, 王星. 儿童及青少年枕颈角与后枕颈角数字化测量及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 17-20.
[5]	李文, 杨思艺, 黄蕾, 卿霁雯, 蒋松涛, 张磊. 基于MRI探讨Lisfranc韧带的形态学特点及临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 21-25.
[6]	李凡凡, 徐阳, 王晓旭. 紫草素调节Nrf2/HO-1信号通路对实验性大鼠肉芽肿性小叶性乳腺炎的治疗作用研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 26-32.
[7]	王兴航, 丁佳媛, 李放, 包翠芬, 阎丽菁. 人参皂苷Rg1通过抑制NLRP3炎症小体途径减轻氧糖剥夺/复供后小胶质细胞炎症反应[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 33-41.
[8]	程莹莹, 武建军, 蔡海燕, 焦旭文, 马江波, 丁银秀. 体外炎性诱导星形胶质细胞激活及功能分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 42-46.
[9]	祁志, 杨力, 贾秋叶, 陈浩伦, 段兆达, 吴春云. 依达拉奉经MAPKs通路对脂多糖激活的小胶质细胞Sirt3表达调控[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 47-53.
[10]	张晶晶, 王洪新. 黄芩苷通过PDGF/P38 MAPK信号通路对肺动脉高压大鼠的保护作用[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 54-58.
[11]	乐钦, 陈荣丽, 熊婧熙, 王婷怡, 蔡志恒, 易秋实, 曾心怡. 白芨多糖对大鼠跨区皮瓣choke区的影响[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 59-64.
[12]	李笑予, 张磊, 付磊, 李东波, 汪国友. 三步接骨法治疗Sanders Ⅱ型跟骨骨折的有限元研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 65-70.
[13]	吴研飞, 马剑雄, 卢斌, 王颖, 柏豪豪, 靳洪震, 马信龙. CT后处理技术重建CT值与终板抗压强度的相关性研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 71-76.
[14]	庄万强, 唐毅, 骆勇刚, 张辉. 关节镜联合胫骨高位截骨术对髌骨位置及髌股关节功能影响的早中期回顾性研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 77-82.
[15]	罗鹰, 窦伟誉, 吴小杭, 陈璟昆, 彭昌贵, 潘剑英 . 微创海马钢板内固定治疗跟骨骨折并发症的影响因素[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 83-88.