颈椎前路多节段融合术后邻椎病的再手术策略

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2023.2.17

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 218-223.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2023.2.17

颈椎前路多节段融合术后邻椎病的再手术策略

涂强^1,2,3,4，孙昊⁴，陈虎³，朱昌荣¹，陈育岳¹，黄显华¹
刘永刚¹，马向阳¹，王建华¹，章凯¹，夏虹¹*

1.中国人民解放军南部战区总医院骨科，广州 510010； 2.陆军军医大学第一附属医院，重庆 400038；
3.南方医科大学研究生院，广州 510515； 4.广州中医药大学研究生院，广州 510000

收稿日期:2021-12-06 出版日期:2023-03-25 发布日期:2023-04-17
通讯作者: 夏虹，主任医师,博士研究生导师，E-mail:gzxiahong2 @126.com
作者简介:涂强（1978-），副主任医师，硕士研究生导师，研究方向：脊柱外科，E-mail：tuqiang@126.com
基金资助:
军队医学科技青年培育计划孵化项目（NO.19QNP040）；广州市科技计划项目（NO.202102021254）；军队后勤科研计划项目（CLB20J033）

The surgical treatment strategy for adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of multi-segments

Tu Qiang^1,2,3,4, Sun Hao⁴, Chen Hu³, Zhu Changrong¹, Chen Yuyue¹, Huang Xianhua¹, Liu Yonggang¹, Ma Xiangyang¹, Wang Jianhua¹, Zhang Kai¹, Xia Hong¹*

1. Department of Orthopedics, General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command, Guangzhou 510010, China; 2. The Southwest Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China; 3. Graduate School, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China; 4. Graduate School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510000, China

Received:2021-12-06 Online:2023-03-25 Published:2023-04-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨颈椎前路多节段融合术后邻椎病的手术治疗策略。方法对2015年至2020年我院收治的13例颈椎前路多节段融合术后邻椎病再手术治疗的患者进行回顾分析，采取颈椎前路Zero-P钢板固定术治疗8例单节段邻椎病，后路颈椎单开门椎管扩大成形术治疗5例2个节段邻椎病，采用JOA评分、VAS评分及NDI指数进行疗效评价，分析X线、CT或MRI影像学表现。结果本组所有病例得到随访，平均随访11.6个月（6~24个月）。两种术式术后患者JOA评分、VAS评分、NDI指数均得到显著改善。颈椎前路Zero-P钢板术后内固定物位置良好，随访未见钢板螺钉松动，骨融合平均时间为7.6个月。颈椎后路单开门椎管扩大成形术治疗患者均未出现C5神经根麻痹、椎板再关门等并发症。结论颈椎前路多节段融合术后邻椎病再手术方式的选择应遵循个体化原则，单节段邻椎病且不伴严重后纵韧带骨化，可选择前路减压融合Zero-P固定术；邻椎病变节段≥2处，可选择后路单开门椎管扩大成形术。

关键词: 颈椎融合术, , 邻椎病, , 前路, , , 后路, , , 再手术

Abstract: Objective To explore the surgical treatment strategy for adjacent segment disease (ASD) after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of multi-segments. Methods From 2015 to 2019, 13 patients with ASD in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Eight patients were treated with anterior cervical Zero-P plate and 5 patients were treated with single-door laminoplasty. JOA, VAS, and NDI were noted to evaluate the clinical outcomes, and X-ray, CT, and MRI imaging were recorded and analyzed as well. Results All the patients were followed up for an average of 11.6 months (6~24 months). The JOA, VAS and NDI were significantly improved after both surgeries. In the anterior cervical operation group, the position of the internal fixation was good and no loosening of the plate screw was observed during follow-up. The average time of bone fusion was about 7.6 months. In patients who were treated with single-door laminoplasty, there were no complications such as C5 nerve root palsy, lamina re-closing and so on. Conclusions The selection of reoperation methods for ASD after multilevel anterior cervical fusion should follow the principle of individualization. For single-level ASD without severe posterior longitudinal ligament ossification, anterior decompression and fusion with the Zero-P system should be selected. For multi-levels ASD, the posterior single-door laminoplasty is preferred.

Key words: Cervical discectomy and fusion, , , Adjacent segment disease, , , Anterior approach, Posterior approach, , , , Reoperation

中图分类号:

R681.5

涂强, 孙昊, 陈虎, 朱昌荣, 陈育岳, 黄显华, 刘永刚, 马向阳, 王建华, 章凯, 夏虹. 颈椎前路多节段融合术后邻椎病的再手术策略[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(2): 218-223.

参考文献 11

[1]	Harada GK, Alter K, Nguyen AQ, et al. Cervical Spine endplate abnormalities and association with pain, disability, and adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2020, 45(15): E917-E926. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003460.
[2]	Hirvonen T, Siironen J, Marjamaa J, et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in young adults leads to favorable outcome in long-term follow-up[J]. Spine J, 2020, 20(7): 1073-1084. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.03.016.
[3]	Lawrence BD, Hilibrand AS, Brodt ED, et al. Predicting the risk of adjacent segment pathology in the cervical spine: a systematic review[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2012, 37(22 Suppl): S52-S64. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e31826d60fb.
[4]	Hussain M, Nassr A, Natarajan RN, et al. Biomechanics of adjacent segments after a multilevel cervical corpectomy using anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior instrumentation techniques: a finite element model study[J]. Spine J, 2013, 13(6): 689-696. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.062.
[5]	Matsumoto M, Okada E, Ichihara D, et al. Anterior cervical decompression and fusion accelerates adjacent segment degeneration: comparison with asymptomatic volunteers in a ten-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study[J]. Spine, 2010, 35(1): 36-43. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b8a80d.
[6]	Chan SC，Ferguson SJ，Wuertz K，et al. Biological response of the intervertebral disc to repetitive short-term cyclic torsion[J]. Spine, 2011, 36(24): 2021-2030. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318203aea5.
[7]	韦竑宇, 蒋欣, 谭明生. 颈椎前路钢板固定融合术后邻近节段骨化发生的因素[J]. 中日友好医院学报, 2009, 23(2): 70-72. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0025.2009.02.002.
[8]	罗春山, 赵国权, 梁栋柱, 等. C5/6椎间隙不同撑开高度对临近椎间盘压力的研究分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2015, 33(6): 696-699. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2015.06.017.
[9]	Zhang Yijian, Shao Yijie, Liu Hao, et al. Association between sagittal balance and adjacent segment degeneration in anterior cervical surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2019, 20(1): 430. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2800-0.
[10]	Coric D, Kim PK, Clemente JD, et al. Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2013, 18(1): 36-42. DOI: 10.3171/2012.9.SPINE12555.
[11]	盛斌, 黄象望, 向铁城, 等. 人工颈椎间盘置换治疗前路颈椎减压融合术后相邻节段病的中期随访观察[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2012, 23(11): 1050-1052. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2013.11.23.

[1]	江剑宏, 段仁鹏, 李晓锋. 国人胆道三维重建解剖变异应用研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 1-4.
[2]	郭红志, 王瑜, 张加琪, 梁海彬, 马梓玮, 冯伟, 吴忧, 司子燚. 血管铸型结合CT三维模型评估先兆子痫胎盘血管结构[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 5-10.
[3]	李佳伟, 张静, 李灿然, 兰文杰, 籍庆余, 郭志勇, 张云凤, 刘启, 陈清威, 李筱贺. 蒙古族人群股骨近端解剖参数X线测量[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 11-16.
[4]	李琨, 张燕, 郭冉, 郝咪咪, 吴轩宇, 徐艺芳, 王超群, 马文童, 张灵淇, 杨宏宇, 李志军, 张少杰, 王星. 儿童及青少年枕颈角与后枕颈角数字化测量及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 17-20.
[5]	李文, 杨思艺, 黄蕾, 卿霁雯, 蒋松涛, 张磊. 基于MRI探讨Lisfranc韧带的形态学特点及临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 21-25.
[6]	李凡凡, 徐阳, 王晓旭. 紫草素调节Nrf2/HO-1信号通路对实验性大鼠肉芽肿性小叶性乳腺炎的治疗作用研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 26-32.
[7]	王兴航, 丁佳媛, 李放, 包翠芬, 阎丽菁. 人参皂苷Rg1通过抑制NLRP3炎症小体途径减轻氧糖剥夺/复供后小胶质细胞炎症反应[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 33-41.
[8]	程莹莹, 武建军, 蔡海燕, 焦旭文, 马江波, 丁银秀. 体外炎性诱导星形胶质细胞激活及功能分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 42-46.
[9]	祁志, 杨力, 贾秋叶, 陈浩伦, 段兆达, 吴春云. 依达拉奉经MAPKs通路对脂多糖激活的小胶质细胞Sirt3表达调控[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 47-53.
[10]	张晶晶, 王洪新. 黄芩苷通过PDGF/P38 MAPK信号通路对肺动脉高压大鼠的保护作用[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 54-58.
[11]	乐钦, 陈荣丽, 熊婧熙, 王婷怡, 蔡志恒, 易秋实, 曾心怡. 白芨多糖对大鼠跨区皮瓣choke区的影响[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 59-64.
[12]	李笑予, 张磊, 付磊, 李东波, 汪国友. 三步接骨法治疗Sanders Ⅱ型跟骨骨折的有限元研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 65-70.
[13]	吴研飞, 马剑雄, 卢斌, 王颖, 柏豪豪, 靳洪震, 马信龙. CT后处理技术重建CT值与终板抗压强度的相关性研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 71-76.
[14]	庄万强, 唐毅, 骆勇刚, 张辉. 关节镜联合胫骨高位截骨术对髌骨位置及髌股关节功能影响的早中期回顾性研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 77-82.
[15]	罗鹰, 窦伟誉, 吴小杭, 陈璟昆, 彭昌贵, 潘剑英 . 微创海马钢板内固定治疗跟骨骨折并发症的影响因素[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 83-88.

颈椎前路多节段融合术后邻椎病的再手术策略

The surgical treatment strategy for adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of multi-segments

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 11

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0