扩大经鼻入路内镜下斜坡区解剖学研究

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2025.1.03

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 14-17.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2025.1.03

扩大经鼻入路内镜下斜坡区解剖学研究

尹都，岑波*，陈阳，戴黎明，周军格，胡飞

长江航运总医院神经外科，湖北武汉 430000

收稿日期:2024-07-31 出版日期:2025-01-25 发布日期:2025-01-22
通讯作者: 岑波，主任医师，E-mail：cenbo2000@sina.com
作者简介:尹都（1982-），男，湖北麻城人，医学硕士，主治医师，主要从事神经外科与颅底解剖，E-mail：86308196@qq.com
基金资助:
武汉市卫健委项目（WX19Q47）

Anatomical study on endoscopic expanded transnasal approach for clival region

Yin Du, Cen Bo*, Chen Yang, Dai Liming, Zhou Junge, Hu Fei

Department of Neurosurgery, General Hospital of the Yangtze River Shipping, Wuhan 43000, Hubei Province, China

Received:2024-07-31 Online:2025-01-25 Published:2025-01-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨斜坡及其相邻结构的解剖特点，为内镜下扩大经鼻入路手术切除斜坡和后颅窝腹侧病变提供指导。方法对6具尸体头部进行解剖学研究，血管予以红蓝硅胶填充，分别在显微镜及内镜下测量主要解剖学标志。结果岩尖上缘与展神经硬膜孔的距离为（3.51±0.62） mm，后床突与展神经硬膜孔的距离为（13.42±1.32） mm，展神经硬膜孔与舌咽神经距离为（21.53±1.73） mm，舌下神经管与舌咽神经距离为（25.62±2.24） mm，舌咽神经孔在咽结节尖端上方（3.73±0.54） mm，咽鼓管孔之间的横向距离为（23.14±1.15） mm。结论内镜扩大经鼻入路是手术治疗斜坡腹侧病变的可行性方法。

关键词: 经鼻内镜入路, , , 斜坡, , , 后颅窝, , , 颅底解剖

Abstract: Objective To introduce the main anatomical structures of clivus and its adjacent structures, so as to provide guidance for endoscopic expanded transnasal approach for the removal of lesions on the ventral side of clivus and posterior fossa. Methods Anatomical studies were conducted on the heads of six cadavers, with blood vessels filling with red and blue silicone. The main anatomical markers were collected and measured under a microscope and an endoscope, respectively. Results The vertical distance between the upper edge of petrous bone apex and dural foramen of abducens nerve was (3.51±0.62) mm. The distance between posterior clinoid process and dural foramen of abducens nerve was (13.42±1.32) mm, the distance between dural foramen of abducens nerve and glossopharyngeal nerve was (21.53±1.73) mm, and the distance between hypoglossal nerve canal and glossopharyngeal nerve was (25.62±2.24) mm. The glossopharyngeal nerve foramen were (3.73±0.54) mm above the tip of pharyngeal tubercle. The transverse distance between eustachian tube foramen was (23.14±1.15) mm. Conclusions Endoscopic extend transnasal approach is a feasible method for surgical treatment of ventral clival lesions.

Key words: , Transnasal endoscopic approach, , , , Clivus, , , Posterior cranial fossa, , , Skull base anatomy

中图分类号:

R323.1

尹都, 岑波, 陈阳, 戴黎明, 周军格, 胡飞. 扩大经鼻入路内镜下斜坡区解剖学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 14-17.

Yin Du, Cen Bo, Chen Yang, Dai Liming, Zhou Junge, Hu Fei. Anatomical study on endoscopic expanded transnasal approach for clival region[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2025, 43(1): 14-17.

参考文献

[1] Brunworth J, Padhye V, Bassiouni A, et al. Up-date on endoscopic endonasal resection of skull base meningiomas[J]. Int Fo-rum Allergy Rhinol, 2015, 5(4): 344-352. DOI: 10.1002/alr.21457.
[2] Jacquesson T, Berhouma M, Tringali S, et al. Which routes for petroclival tumors? A comparison between the anterior expanded endoscopic endonasal approach and lateral or posterior routes[J]. World Neurosurg, 2015, 83(6): 929-936. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.02.003.
[3] Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, et al. Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the midline skull base: the evolving role of transsphenoidal surgery[J]. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg, 2008, 33: 151-199. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-211-72283-1_4.
[4] Funaki T, Matsushima T, Peris-Celda M, et al. Focal transnasal approach to the upper, middle, and lower clivus[J]. Neurosurgery, 2013, 73(2): 155-191. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000431469.82215.93.
[5] Barges-Coll J, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Prevedello DM, et al. Avoiding injury to the abducens nerve during expanded endonasal endoscopic surgery: anatomic and clinical case studies[J]. Neurosurgery, 2010, 67(1): 144-154. DOI: 101277/01. Neu.0000370892.11284.EA.
[6] Shkarubo AN, Koval' KV, Dobrovol'SKIY GF, et al. Extended endoscopic endonasal posterior (transclival) approach to tumors of the clival region and ventral posterior cranial fossa. Part 2. Topographic and anatomical aspects and surgical technique[J]. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko, 2017, 81(5): 17-30. DOI: 10.17116/engneiro2017815 14-26.
[7] Iaconetta G, Fusco M, Cavallo LM, et al. The abducens nerve: microanatomic and endoscopic study[J]. Neurosurgery, 2007, 61: 7-14. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000289706.42061.19.
[8] Osawa S, Rhoton ALJR, Tanriover N, et al. Microsurgical anatomy and surgical exposure of the petrous segment of the internal carotid artery[J]. Neurosurgery, 2008,63: 210-239. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.000032 7037. 75571.10.
[9] 纪荣明, 李玉泉, 张煜辉, 等. 经口咽至斜坡区手术入路的应用解剖学[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2003, 21(6): 549-551. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn. 1001-165X.2003.06.007.
[10] Sanmillan JL, Lawton MT, Rincon-Torroella J, et al. Assessment of the endoscopic endonasal transclival approach for surgical clipping of anterior pontine anterior-inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms[J]. World Neurosurg, 2016, 89: 368-375. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.01.081.
[11] 秦军, 雷霆, 舒凯, 等. 经鼻蝶入路至斜坡区的内镜解剖学研究[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志, 2007, (2): 86-88. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-153X.2007.02.008.
[12]Jahangiri A, Chin AT, Wagner JR, et al. Factors predicting recurrence after resection of clival chordoma using variable surgicalapproaches and radiation modalities[J]. Neurosurgery, 2015, 76(2): 179-186. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000611.
[13] Dallan I, Bignami M, Battaglia P, et al. Fullyendoscopic transnasal approach to the jugular foramen: anatomic study andclinical considerations[J]. Neurosurgery, 2010, 67(3): ons1-ons8. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000354351.00684.B9.
[14] 缪星宇, 曹杰, 师蔚. 颞下锁孔入路内镜下基底动脉分叉部的解剖学研究[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志, 2012, 17(7): 3. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-153X.2012.07.003.
[15]Little RE, Taylor RJ, Miller JD, et al. Endoscopic endonasal transclivalapproaches: case series and outcomes for different clival regions[J]. J NeurolSurg B Skull Base, 2014, 75(4): 247-254. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1371522 Epub 2014 Apr 17.
[16] Koutourousiou M, Filho FV, Costacou T, et al. Pontine encephalocele and abnormalities of the posterior fossa following transclival endoscopic endonasal surgery[J]. J Neurosurg, 2014, 121(2): 359-366. DOI: 10.3171/2013.12.JNS13756.

扩大经鼻入路内镜下斜坡区解剖学研究

Anatomical study on endoscopic expanded transnasal approach for clival region

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	李海艳, 黎萌, 杜心如. 股骨头颈压力骨小梁与股骨颈后内侧骨皮质及股骨距移行处的形态学观察及临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 1-8.
[2]	安雷雷, 孔祥玉, 刘鹏飞, 张宾, 马真, 杜心如. 椎动脉V₃段与第2颈神经毗邻关系的解剖学观测及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 9-13.
[3]	张凤珍, 尹兆正, 伊钰营, 李磊, 赵婧, 王星, 李琨, 李志军, 张少杰. 基于儿童连续薄层解剖数据集三维重建骶椎及其软骨的可视化研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 18-25.
[4]	谢思远, 林源洵, 张沄奡龙, 冯梓誉, 李义凯. 颈椎未成熟骺环的影像学观察[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 26-30.
[5]	王娟, 郭龙军, 滕佳岐, 陈玉昆, 贺文. 双肺下叶静脉解剖分型MSCT评价及临床应用探讨[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 31-39.
[6]	张磊, 唐湘宇, 姜璐, 杨思艺, 周鑫, 柳天宇, 汪国友. Kager脂肪垫的分类及其与后踝撞击综合征的关系[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 40-44.
[7]	陈永龙, 王伟, 陈炯灰, 张镇武, 李俊, 杨志超, 黄春明, 李小川. 退行性腰椎侧弯患者L3椎弓根形态变异及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 45-53.
[8]	赵婷婷, 宋爽, 石科, 李晓英, 李攀阳, 李宁宁. 食管癌中miRNA枢纽靶基因的鉴定和验证[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 54-62.
[9]	莫娟梅, 张顺荣, 李健, 王振宁, 唐伟智, 梁碧琦, 庞宇舟, 周建龙, 周韶璋, 黄国东. 壮药扶正方通过改善Lewis肺癌CD8⁺ T细胞耗竭提高PD-L1抑制剂疗效的机制研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 63-68.
[10]	王鹏, 张德宝, 张杨, 张海斌, 时嘉, 张少杰, 李树文, 吴一民. 自体黄韧带干预TGF-β1/Smad3信号通路抑制兔硬膜外纤维瘢痕形成的实验研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 69-75.
[11]	李伟君, 周沂, 吴建辉, 陈丽华, 刘海英, 翟丽东. TVT与TVT-O不同位置治疗老年女性压力性尿失禁的有限元分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 76-81.
[12]	许遵营, 刘晖, 徐维臻, 张金辉, 熊远飞, 庄平, 林金河, 吴进. 逆行与顺行胫骨髓内钉治疗胫骨远端关节外骨折的疗效对比研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 82-89.
[13]	何一波, 罗张风, 田宇, 蒋帅, 谢龙辉, 邵怡雯, 李莉, 饶利兵. 数字定位结合3D打印经皮穿刺导板在股骨颈骨折内固定治疗中的应用[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 90-96.
[14]	刘龙奇, 史良, 王科大, 苏亦兵. 电生理监测显微手术治疗脊髓髓内肿瘤的手术效果及预后随访研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 97-101.
[15]	邓棕元, 陈崇, 梁国彦, 叶勇裕, 余正然, 余涛, 汪露通, 梁昌详, 昌耘冰. 铁死亡介导椎间盘退变的研究进展[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025, 43(1): 102-106.