锚钉联合骨道技术重建肘关节尺侧副韧带前束的生物力学研究

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2018.03.017

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 319-324.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2018.03.017

锚钉联合骨道技术重建肘关节尺侧副韧带前束的生物力学研究

蔡慧^1，2，　徐世明²，　邓子文²，　黄东²，　刘晓春²，　余超群²

1.南华大学教学医院广东省第二人民医院，广州 510317；　2.广东省第二人民医院创伤外科，广州 510317

收稿日期:2017-12-05 出版日期:2018-05-25 发布日期:2018-07-04
通讯作者: 黄东，主任医师，博士生导师，E-mail：dong-177@163.com
作者简介:蔡慧（1987-），男，湖南娄底人，在读硕士，研究方向：创伤修复与重建，E-mail:412301216@qq.com
基金资助:
广东省科技计划项目（A2016007）

Biomechanical study on the reconstruction of anterior bundle of ulnar collateral ligament of elbow joint using suture anchor combined with bone tunnel technique

CAI Hui ^1,2, XU Shi-ming²， DENG Zi-wen²， HUANG Dong²， LIU Xiao-chun²，YU Chao-qun ²

1.University of South China Teaching Hospital of Guangdong NO.2 Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangzhou 510317, China; 2. Department of Traumatic Surgery, Guangdong NO.2 Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangzhou 510317, China

Received:2017-12-05 Online:2018-05-25 Published:2018-07-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨肘关节尺侧副韧带（ulnar collateral ligament，UCL）前束在完整、断裂、重建三种状态时的肘外翻稳定性，评价锚钉联合骨道重建技术的有效性。方法　选用8具新鲜成人尸体上肢制成肘关节骨-韧带模型，均先后模拟成UCL前束完整、断裂及锚钉联合骨道技术重建前束3种状态，测量各状态下肘关节在屈曲0°、30°、60°、90°、120°时的生物力学指标，包括外翻松弛度、肱桡关节接触面积、肱桡关节内压强；根据前束的不同状态分为完整组、断裂组、重建组，每组8具标本，将得出的数据进行统计学分析。结果　组内比较，各组在屈肘0°时的生物力学指标与其余角度比较，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；组间比较，各组在0°时的生物力学指标比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；组间比较，除0°以外的其余角度，完整组与断裂组、重建组与断裂组的生物力学指标差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），完整组与重建组的生物力学指标差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论　UCL前束是维持肘关节外翻稳定性的重要结构。肘关节在伸直位时较屈曲位处于相对稳定状态。锚钉联合骨道技术重建UCL前束不仅能恢复肘外翻稳定性，而且还具有与正常肘关节同等优良的生物力学特性。

关键词: 肘关节, 　尺侧副韧带, 　重建, 　生物力学

Abstract:

Objective　To explore the valgus stability of the elbow joint when the anterior bundle of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) in three states of complete, fracture and reconstruction, and to evaluate the effectiveness of suture anchor combined with bone tunnel technique. Methods　8 fresh adult upper limb cadavers were adopted to establish samples of the bone-ligament of the elbow joint, and the anterior bundle of UCL of each sample was simulated as three states of intact, fracture and reconstruction, then the biomechanical indexes of the elbow joint at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°and 120°, including valgus laxity, contact area and pressure in the humeroradial joint. The samples were divided into 3 groups according to the different state of the anterior bundle of UCL: the intact group, the fracture group, and the reconstruction group. There were 8 cases in every group. The data were obtained and statistic analysis was made.　Results　In each group, the biomechanical indexes of each group at 0° were significantly different when those under (P＜0.05）； among the three groups，there was no statistical difference in the biomechanical indexes of each group at 0 °（P＞0.05）, whereas significant difference would be found at the other angles between the intact and fracture groups and the fracture and reconstruction groups（P＜0.05）. Conclusion　The anterior bundle of UCL is an important structure to maintain the valgus stability of the elbow joint. The elbow joint at the straight position is relatively stable compared with the flexion position. The elbow joint after reconstruction of anterior bundle of UCL using suture anchor combined with bone tunnel technique not only has sufficient stability, but also has the same excellent biomechanical properties as the normal elbow.

Key words: Elbow joint, 　Ulnar collateral ligament, 　Reconstruction, 　Biomechanics

蔡慧,徐世明,邓子文,黄东,刘晓春,余超群. 锚钉联合骨道技术重建肘关节尺侧副韧带前束的生物力学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2018, 36(3): 319-324.

CAI Hui,XU Shi-ming,DENG Zi-wen,HUANG Dong,LIU Xiao-chun,YU Chao-qun. Biomechanical study on the reconstruction of anterior bundle of ulnar collateral ligament of elbow joint using suture anchor combined with bone tunnel technique[J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Anatomy, 2018, 36(3): 319-324.

参考文献

[1] Erickson BJ, Harris JD, Chalmers PN, et al. Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction: anatomy, indications, techniques, and outcomes[J]. Sports Health, 2015, 7(6): 511-517.
[2] Savoie FH, O'BRien M. Chronic medial instability of the elbow[J]. EFORT Open Rev, 2017, 2(1): 1-6.
[3] Daruwalla JH, Daly CA, Seiler JG 3rd. Medial elbow injuries in the throwing athlete[J]. Hand Clin, 2017, 33(1): 47-62.
[4] Dugas J, Chronister J, Cain EL Jr, et al. Ulnar collateral ligament in the overhead athlete: a current review[J]. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev, 2014, 22(3): 169-182.
[5] 崔岩,潘昭勋,张洪鑫,等.前束等长重建肘关节内侧副韧带的临床效果[J]. 实用医药杂志, 2013, 30(5): 419-421.
[6] Camp CL, Dines JS, Voleti PB, et al. Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow: The docking technique[J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2016, 5(3): e519- e523.
[7] 王友华,汤锦波,纪标,等.肘关节内侧副韧带形态结构研究[J]. 中国临床医学, 2005, 12(1): 115-117.
[8] 杨运平, 徐达传, 赵卫东, 等. 肘关节稳定性的应用解剖和生物力学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2002, 20(4): 243-245.
[9] 纪标, 王友华, 赵敦炎, 等. 肘关节内侧副韧带的解剖、功能及生物力学的研究[J]. 南通大学学报（医学版）, 2006, 26(2): 97-99.
[10]Lynch JL, Maerz T, Kurdziel MD, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the tightRope versus traditional docking ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique : kinematic and failure testing[J]. AM J Sports Med, 2013, 41(5): 1165-1173.
[11]Cohen SB, Woods DP, Siegler S, et al. Biomechanical comparison of graft fixation at 30° and 90° of elbow flexion for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction by the docking technique[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2015, 24(2): 265-272.
[12]Erickson BJ, Bach BR Jr, Cohen MS, et al. Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction : The rush experience[J]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2016, 4(1): 2325967115626876.
[13]Erickson BJ, Cvetanovich GL, Frank RM, et al. Do clinical results and return-to-sport rates after ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction differ based on graft choice and surgical technique[J]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2016, 4(11): 2325967116670142.
[14]张军威. 肘关节内侧副韧带前束损伤与肘外翻不稳定[J]. 中国运动医学杂志, 2012, 31(9): 830-834.
[15]Chronister JE, Morris RP, Andersen CR, et al. A biomechanical comparison of 2 hybrid techniques for elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction[J]. J Hand Surg AM, 2014, 39(10): 2033-2040.
[16]Wong TT, Lin DJ, Ayyala RS, et al. Elbow injuries in adult overhead athletes[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2017, 208(3): W110-W120.
[17]Leahy I, Schorpion M, Ganley T. Common medial elbow injuries in the adolescent athlete[J]. J Hand Ther, 2015, 28(2): 201-210.
[18]林艳红,林木南,李西海,等.生物力学调节骨关节炎软骨退变的作用机制探讨[J]. 风湿病与关节炎, 2014,3(9): 54-56.
[19]Kaplan DJ, Glait SA, Ryan WE Jr, et al. Modified Jobe approach with docking technique for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction[J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2016, 5(6): e1321-e1326.

锚钉联合骨道技术重建肘关节尺侧副韧带前束的生物力学研究

Biomechanical study on the reconstruction of anterior bundle of ulnar collateral ligament of elbow joint using suture anchor combined with bone tunnel technique

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	李笑予, 张磊, 付磊, 李东波, 汪国友. 三步接骨法治疗Sanders Ⅱ型跟骨骨折的有限元研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 65-70.
[2]	吴研飞, 马剑雄, 卢斌, 王颖, 柏豪豪, 靳洪震, 马信龙. CT后处理技术重建CT值与终板抗压强度的相关性研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 71-76.
[3]	张悦, 蔡兴博, 张必欢, 王斌, 徐永清. 全腕关节置换术后腕关节生物力学研究进展[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 112-114.
[4]	欧阳北平, 马向阳, 罗春山, 邹小宝, 梁栋柱, 陆廷盛, 陈啟鸰. 钉尾横连与棒-棒横连在后路寰枢椎固定中的生物力学对比研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(5): 588-592.
[5]	林文杰, 孙欣, 黄文华, 魏波, 林涛, 梁振明, 钟环, 张欣, 欧阳汉斌. 踝关节融合术后后足关节生物力学分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(2): 212-217.
[6]	童杰, 季伟, 黄志平, 周若舟, 房佐忠, 朱青安. 枕颈区后路柔性动态固定的生物力学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(3): 315-319.
[7]	仝铃, 许阳阳, 王一丹, 马渊, 王海燕, 李筱贺. 颈椎前路微型记忆加压合金板的有限元分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(3): 320-326.
[8]	童杰, 季伟, 黄志平, 周若舟, 房佐忠, 朱青安. 寰枢椎后路柔性固定的生物力学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(1): 72-77.
[9]	余盛, 庞清江. 颈椎间孔韧带的解剖特点及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(1): 109-112.
[10]	王高飞, 张珠峰, 魏壮. V-Y延长指背腱膜终腱止点重建术治疗陈旧性锤状指的生物力学实验研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(3): 330-335.
[11]	杨诚, 李祯, 廖坚文, 樊仕才, 杨健, 白晓春. 基于柠檬酸合成的新型可降解螺钉生物相容性和生物力学特性的研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(2): 182-186.
[12]	胡力达, 田广永, 徐飘, 林琼萍. 鼓膜-听骨链精细三维重建及谐响应有限元分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2019, 37(6): 680-685.
[13]	康永强, 　芮永军 . 2~5掌指关节屈伸活动中关节面应力分布的有限元分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2019, 37(3): 299-303.
[14]	李亮,徐永清,何晓清,李川. 三种内固定器械固定中足损伤的生物力学比较[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2019, 37(2): 179-184.
[15]	陈国立,胡洪新,吴献伟,林妹,戴玉林,林海滨 . 3D打印胫骨隧道导航模块辅助前交叉韧带重建的临床研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2019, 37(1): 102-106.