直接前入路和微创后外侧入路人工股骨头置换术治疗高龄股骨颈骨折患者的疗效比较

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2018.06.016

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 678-682.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2018.06.016

直接前入路和微创后外侧入路人工股骨头置换术治疗高龄股骨颈骨折患者的疗效比较

张英剑，　李志永，　吴树文，　方广文，　商福青，　刘嵬

天津市宝坻区人民医院骨科，天津 301800

收稿日期:2018-06-05 出版日期:2018-11-25 发布日期:2018-12-29
通讯作者: 刘嵬，主治医师，硕士研究生，E-mail:56246503@qq.com
作者简介:张英剑（1965-），主任医师，研究方向：创伤骨科，Tel:13302050078, E-mail:zhangyingjian.88@163.com
基金资助:
天津市卫生局科技基金资助（2011KZ05）

Comparison of the direct anterior and posterolateral piriformis-sparing approach in bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the elderly patients with femoral neck fracture

ZHANG Ying-jian，LI Zhi-yong，WU Shu-wen，FANG Guang-wen，SHANG Fu-qing，LIU Wei

Department of Orthopaedics，Tianjin Baodi Hospital，Tianjin 301800，China

Received:2018-06-05 Online:2018-11-25 Published:2018-12-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　本研究旨在比较直接前入路（direct anterior approach，DAA）和微创后外侧入路（posterolateral piriformis-sparing approach，Mis-PLA）人工股骨头置换术治疗高龄股骨颈骨折患者的疗效。方法　44例高龄单侧股骨颈骨折患者按照行人工股骨头置换术入路随机分为DAA组（n =22）和Mis-PLA组（n =22）。2组均完成术后2年随访调查，比较2组患者手术情况、术后早期疼痛及并发症情况、术后早期坐位的能力、弃拐独立行走的时间、术后6周及2年患者功能活动Harris评分及术后2年死亡率。结果　（1）与Mis-PLA组相比，DAA组患者手术时间较长，术后72 h患肺炎的人数较少，术后24 h VAS评分减低，术后患者可坐位1 h的时间及弃拐独立行走的时间较早（P＜0.05）。（2）术后6周，DAA组在穿袜系鞋带及坐椅子方面Harris评分优于Mis-PLA组（P＜0.05），两组上楼梯方面Harris评分无统计学差异（P＞0.05）。术后2年，两组患者在功能活动Harris评分均无统计学差异（P＞0.05）。（3）术后随访2年，2组患者死亡率差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论　DAA入路股骨头置换术在治疗高龄股骨颈骨折患者中，可以较Mis-PLA入路更有效地降低术后长期卧床的相关并发症的发生率，减轻患者术后疼痛，更早更快地改善患者术后髋关节功能。

关键词: 高龄, 　股骨颈骨折, 　人工股骨头置换术, 　直接前入路, 　微创后外侧入路

Abstract:

Objective　The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy after bipolar hemiarthroplasty（BHA） via the direct anterior approach（DAA）or posterolateral piriformis-sparing approach（Mis-PLA） following the elderly patients with femoral neck fracture.　Methods　44 elderly patients with femoral neck fracture were divided into a DAA group (n =22) and a Mis-PLA group (n=22) according to the surgical approach. The two groups of patients were followed up for 2 years after the operation. The clinical data，postoperative pain and complications，the time to keep the seat for 1 hour and walking independently，the postoperative Harris score of functional activity in 6 weeks and 2 years and the death rate of patients 2 years after operation were compared between the two groups.　Results　（1）Compared with the Mis-PLA group, the patients in group DAA had longer surgical duration, but the number of patients with pneumonia 72 hours after the operation was less，the VAS score of DAA patients decreased after 24 hours of operation, and the time of keeping the seat for 1 hour and walking independently was earlier than that of the Mis-PLA group (P < 0.05).（2）6 weeks after the operation, the Harris score of Climbing stairs and wearing socks and shoelaces in the DAA group was better than that in the Mis-PLA group (P < 0.05), but there was no statistical difference in the Harris score of the staircase (P >0.05). After 2 years, there was no significant difference in Harris scores between the two groups (P>0.05).（3）After 2 years of follow-up, there was no significant difference in mortality between the 2 groups (P>0.05).　Conclusions　In the elderly patients with femoral head replacement, DAA approach can be more effective than Mis-PLA approach for reducing the incidence of complications associated with long-term bed rest, relieving postoperative pain, and improving the postoperative hip function.

Key words: Elderly patients, Femoral neck fracture, Bipolar hemiarthroplasty, Direct anterior approach, Posterolateral piriformis-sparing approach

张英剑,李志永,吴树文,方广文,商福青,刘嵬 . 直接前入路和微创后外侧入路人工股骨头置换术治疗高龄股骨颈骨折患者的疗效比较[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2018, 36(6): 678-682.

ZHANG Ying-jian，LI Zhi-yong，WU Shu-wen，FANG Guang-wen，SHANG Fu-qing，LIU Wei. Comparison of the direct anterior and posterolateral piriformis-sparing approach in bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the elderly patients with femoral neck fracture[J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Anatomy, 2018, 36(6): 678-682.

参考文献

[1] Boukebous B, Boutroux P, Zahi R, et al. Comparison of dual mobility total hip arthroplasty and bipolar arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: a retrospective case-control study of 199 hips[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res，2018，104(3):369-375.
[2] Dietrich M, Kabelitz M, Dora C，et al. Perioperative fractures in cementless total hip arthroplasty using the direct anterior minimally invasive approach: reduced risk with short stems[J]. J Arthroplasty，2018，33(2):548-554.
[3] van der Sijp MPL, van Delft D, Krijnen P，et al. Surgical approaches and hemiarthroplasty outcomes for femoral neck fractures: a meta-analysis[J]. J Arthroplasty，2018，33（5）: 1617-1627.
[4] Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD,et al. 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values[J]. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2011, 43(8):1575-1581.
[5] 祝宗华，郭涛，徐文联，等.微创后外侧入路全髋关节置换的应用解剖[J].中国临床解剖学杂志，2009, 27（6）：654-657.
[6] Söderman P, Malchau H. Is the Harris hip score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res，2001，384:189-197. 　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　（下转第689页）
（上接第682页）
[7] 肖智青，徐洲发，朱锦忠，等. 平卧位下改良前外侧入路人工全髋关节置换术的初步探讨[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志，2017，35（4）：456-458.
[8] Schultz K, Ewbank ML, Pandit HG. Changing practice for hip arthroplasty and its implications[J]. Br J Nurs, 2017, 14, 26(22):1238-1244.
[9] Mayr E, Nogler M, Benedetti MG ,et al. A prospective randomized assessment of earlier functional recovery in THA patients treated by minimally invasive direct anterior approach:a gait analysis study[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol，Avon). 2009 ，24（10）: 812-818.
[10] Nakata K, Nishikawa M, Yamamoto K, et al. A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2009, 24(5): 698-704.
[11] Meneghini RM , Pagnano MW , Trousdale RT，et al. Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Peterson versus posterior approach[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006, 453:293-298.
[12] Alexiou KI, Roushias A, Varitimidis SE, et al. Quality of life and psychological consequences in elderly patients after a hip fracture: a review[J]. Clin Interv Aging, 2018, 13:143-150.
[13] Taunton MJ, Mason JB, Odum SM, et al. Direct anterior total Hip arthroplasty yields more rapid voluntary cessation of all walking aids: a prospective, randomized clinical trial[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2014，29（9 suppl）:169-172.
[14] Renken F, Renken S, Paech A, et al. Early functional results after Hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: a randomized comparison between a minimal invasive and a conventional approach[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2012，13:141.

直接前入路和微创后外侧入路人工股骨头置换术治疗高龄股骨颈骨折患者的疗效比较

Comparison of the direct anterior and posterolateral piriformis-sparing approach in bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the elderly patients with femoral neck fracture

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	李骏然, 梁俊生, 李冬梅, 翟婧秀, 徐颖, 王宏润, 邓福宽, 李力更. 特制牵引床在直接前侧入路半髋关节置换术中的应用[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(3): 349-353.
[2]	李海艳, 司丽娜, 要星晨, 杜心如. 股骨颈滋养孔的形态特点及临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(3): 258-262.
[3]	张松强, 周广良, 邓伟, 张向南, 居发新, 李雷, 鞠文, 周正虎, 李关兴, 巨积辉, 侯瑞兴. 股骨头内吻合断裂支持带动脉重建血供的可行性研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(4): 394-397.
[4]	马海召, 冯新霞, 付宏伟, 马志华, 韩文林. 加长型骨水泥双动头假体伴钢丝捆扎治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2020, 38(5): 609-613.
[5]	孙丽, 葛明晓, 邢卫杰, 蔡柳洪, 陶欣, 李小利, 欧建平. 高龄女性自然周期和促排卵周期人工授精结局的比较[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2020, 38(3): 343-347.