基质诱导自体软骨细胞移植术治疗距骨软骨损伤临床疗效观察

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2019.01.019

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 91-96.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2019.01.019

基质诱导自体软骨细胞移植术治疗距骨软骨损伤临床疗效观察

柳海峰，　吴冰，　梁达强，　李皓，　陆伟

深圳大学第一附属医院（深圳市第二人民医院）运动医学科，深圳市组织工程重点实验室，广东深圳 518000

收稿日期:2018-06-02 出版日期:2019-01-25 发布日期:2019-02-20
通讯作者: 吴冰，博士，E-mail:cdtywubing@163.com；陆伟，教授，E-mail:13922855513@139.com
作者简介:柳海峰（1980-），硕士，副主任医师，主要从事运动医学科研与临床工作，E-mail:xl-wind@163.com
基金资助:
广东省自然科学基金（2018A030313834）；广东省科技计划项目 (2014A020212656，2015A030401017)；广东省医学科研基金项目（A2018284）；深圳市科技计划项目(JCYJ20170306091150112)；深圳市卫生系统科研项目 (SZXJ2018061, SZXJ2017050)

Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation of talus cartilage defect

LIU Hai-feng, WU Bing, LIANG Da-qiang, LI Hao, LU Wei

Department of Sports Medicine, Shenzhen first Affiliated Hospital, Shenzhen University (Shenzhen Second People Hospital), Shenzhen Tissue Engineering Laboratory, Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong Province, China

Received:2018-06-02 Online:2019-01-25 Published:2019-02-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

探讨基质诱导自体软骨细胞移植术（matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation，MACI）治疗距骨软骨损伤的临床疗效。方法　2012年3月至2014年9月，收治距骨软骨损伤并行MACI手术患者17例，男12例，女5例，平均年龄（32.6±1.4）岁（21~ 48岁），平均损伤面积(3.4±0.8)cm2（1.6~ 5.8 cm2），Hepple分型：Ⅰ型5例、Ⅱ型9例、Ⅲ型3例。第一次手术行软骨取样，经2~ 4周组织工程软骨制备后，返院行软骨回植手术。对比术前与术后VAS评分、AOFAS足踝功能评分、软骨修复核磁共振影像评分（magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue，MOCART）。结果　患者随访时间（52.3±5.6）月(38~ 72月)。末次随访时VAS评分、AOFAS评分、MOCART评分与术前相比，均显著改善：（0.8±0.6）vs（7.8±1.4），（94.8±1.9）vs（69.2±2.7），（6.5±0.4）vs（3.6±0.8），（P<0.05）。末次随访时MRI显示：肥厚性软骨完全覆盖6例，正常厚度完全覆盖11例；与周边正常软骨信号强度一致4例，基本一致13例。结论　MACI手术治疗软骨下骨全层距骨软骨损伤中期临床效果良好，远期疗效还有待进一步观察。

关键词: 踝关节, 　距骨, 　软骨损伤, 　基质诱导自体软骨细胞移植

Abstract:

Objective　To evaluate clinical outcomes of Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) in the treatment of talus cartilage defects.　Methods　From March 2012 to September 2014, a retrospective analysis of MACI was performed on eleven patients who had sustained talus cartilage lesion. 17 cases (12 male and 5 female) were enrolled into the study with a mean age of (32.6±1.4) years old ( ranging from 21 to 48 years old) and a mean defective area of (3.4±0.8) cm2( ranging from 1.6 to 5.8 cm2). Hepple classification: 5 cases of HeppleⅠ，9 cases of HeppleⅡ and 3 cases of Hepple Ⅲ. Arthroscopy, debridement and cartilage harvesting procedure were performed in the first operation. After 2 to 4 weeks of preparation of tissue engineering cartilage, autologous grafting and sealing of the defect with fibrin glue were performed. All patients were regularly followed up. VAS score, AOFAS score and magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue ( MOCART) were adopted for assessment of clinical outcomes.　Results All surgeries were performed successfully with a mean follow-up time of (52.3±5.6 ) months( ranging from 38 to 72 months). The VAS score, AOFAS score and MOCART score at the final follow-up were significantly improved compared with those prior to operation, i.e, (0.8±0.6) vs (7.8±1.4) points, (94.8±1.9)vs(69.2± 2.7) points, (6.5± 0.4)vs(3.6± 0.8) points, P<0.05). Complete filling of the defect at the level of the surrounding cartilage was found in 11 cases, and complete filling with a hypertrophic cartilage layer was found in 6 cases of the patients. Normal signal intensity of the repair tissue compared with the adjacent native cartilage was seen in 4 cases, with nearly normal activity in 13 cases.　Conclusions　MACI therapy for talus cartilage defects with normal subchondral bone can obtain good clinical outcomes, while the long term clinical outcomes remains to be seen.

Key words: Ankle joint, 　Talus, 　Cartilage lesions, 　Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation( MACI)

柳海峰,吴冰,梁达强,李皓,陆伟. 基质诱导自体软骨细胞移植术治疗距骨软骨损伤临床疗效观察[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2019, 37(1): 91-96.

LIU Hai-feng, WU Bing, LIANG Da-qiang, LI Hao, LU Wei. Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation of talus cartilage defect[J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Anatomy, 2019, 37(1): 91-96.

参考文献

[1] Orr JD, Dawson LK, Garcia EJ, et al. Incidence of osteochondral lesions of the talus in the United States military[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2011, 32(10): 948- 954.
[2] Laffenêtre O. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: current concept[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2010, 96(5): 554- 566.
[3] Bazaz R, Ferkel RD. Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus with autologous chondrocyte implantation[J]. Techniques Foot Ankle Surgery, 2004, 3(3): 45- 52.
[4] Millington SA, Li B, Tang J, et al. Quantitative and topographical evaluation of ankle articular cartilage using highresolution MRI[J]. J Orthop Res, 2007, 25(2): 143- 151.
[5] Saxena A, Eakin C. Articular talar injuries in athletes: results of microfracture and autogenous bone graft [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2007, 35(10): 1680- 1687.
[6] Nelson AJ, Collins CL, Yard EE, et al. Ankle injuries among United States high school sports athletes, 2005-2006 [J]. J Athl Train, 2007, 42(3): 381- 387.
[7] Easley ME. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: diagnosis and treatment[J]. Curr Opin Orthop, 2003, 14(2): 69- 73.
[8] Hangody L, Füles P. Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of full - thickness defects of weight-bearing joints: ten years of experimental and clinical experience[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 2003, 85 (Suppl 2): 25- 32.
[9] Haraguchi N, Ota K, Nishida N, etal. T1ρ mapping of articular cartilage grafts after autologous osteochondral transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the talus: a longitudinal evaluation[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2018, 48(2): 398-403.
[10] Fraser EJ, Savage-Elliott I, Yasui Y, etal. Clinical and MRI donor site outcomes following autologous osteochondral transplantation for talar osteochondral lesions[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2016, 37(9): 968-976.
[11] Giza E, Sullivan M, Ocel D, et al. Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation of talus articular defects[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2010, 31(9): 747- 753.
[12] Kreulen C, Giza E, Walton J, et al. Seven-year follow-up of matrix-induced autologous implantation in talus articular defects[J]. Foot Ankle Spec, 2018, 11(2): 133-137.
[13] Desando G, Bartolotti I, Vannini F, et al. Repair potential of matrix-induced bone marrow aspirate concentrate and matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for talar osteochondral repair: patterns of some catabolic, inflammatory, and pain mediators[J]. Cartilage, 2017, 8(1): 50-60.
[14] Schneider TE, Karaikudi S. Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) grafting for osteochondral lesions of the talus[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2009, 30(9): 810-814.
[15]聂庆虎，张仲文，丁晨，等．基质诱导的自体软骨细胞移植术治疗距骨软骨损伤一例报道［J /CD］．中华关节外科杂志: 电子版，2015，9(3) : 425- 427．
[16] Hepple S, Winson IG, Glew D, et al. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: a revised classification[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 1999, 20(12): 789- 793.
[17] Marlovits S, Striessnig G, Resinger CT, et al. Definition of pertinent parameters for the evaluation of articular cartilage repair tissue with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2004, 52(3): 310- 319.
[18]郭秦炜，胡跃林，焦晨，等．踝关节距骨骨软骨损伤的影像学及关节镜下表现[J].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2010,4(6):723-728.
[19] Guhl JF. Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondritis dissecans: preliminary report[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 1979, 10(3): 671-683.
[20]Aurich M, Venbrocks RA, Fuhrmann RA. Autologous chondrocyte transplantation in the ankle joint. Rational or irrational[J]. Orthopade, 2008, 37(3): 190-195.
[21] Ateshian GA, Soslowsky LJ, Mow VC. Quantitation of articular surface topography and cartilage thickness in knee joints using stereophotogrammetry[J]. J Biomech, 1991, 24(8): 761-776.
[22] Al-Ali D, Graichen H, Faber S, et al. Quantitative cartilage imaging of the human hind foot: Precision and inter-subject variability[J]. J Orthop Res, 2002, 20(2): 249-256.
[23]Treppo S, Koepp H, Quan EC, et al. Comparison of biomechanical and biochemical properties of cartilage from human knee and ankle pairs [J]. J Orthop Res, 2000, 18 (5): 739-748.
[24] Zengerink M, Struijs PA, Tol JL, et al. Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systematic review[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2010, 18(2): 238-246.
[25] Giannini S, Buda R, Ruffilli A, et al. Arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation in the ankle joint[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2014, 22(6): 1311-1319.
[26] Magnan B, Samaila E, Bondi M, et al. Three-dimensional matrix-induced autologous chondrocytes implantation for osteochondral lesions of the talus: midterm results[J]. Adv Orthop. 2012, 2012: 942174.

基质诱导自体软骨细胞移植术治疗距骨软骨损伤临床疗效观察

Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation of talus cartilage defect

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	林文杰, 孙欣, 黄文华, 魏波, 林涛, 梁振明, 钟环, 张欣, 欧阳汉斌. 踝关节融合术后后足关节生物力学分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(2): 212-217.
[2]	郑加法, 　李荣俊, 　宋秀锋. 腓骨瓣支撑空心钉固定与腓骨截骨锁定钢板固定行胫距跟关节融合术的疗效比较[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(4): 471-475.
[3]	胡秀年, 刘辉, 占鹏, 陈日江, 廖元军, 兰伟斌, 邱汉民, 陈东风. 比较踝关节骨折后踝螺钉不同进钉方向固定疗效[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(6): 716-720.
[4]	薛浩文, 褚虹宇, 左解鹏, 武珂卉, 韩青, 程凯亮, 杨艳艳, 朱庆三. 基于CT的中国正常成人踝关节三维形态学分析及应用研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(5): 539-545.
[5]	魏珂, 陈启旺, 毛海蛟. 数字化技术辅助微创经皮螺钉固定距骨后突骨折的临床研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(2): 192-195.
[6]	周云烽, 徐达政, 陈仲, 姚伙生, 张琮达, 李卫平, 沈慧勇, 宋斌. 踝关节外侧韧带的形态学分型及临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(2): 121-125.
[7]	刘金鑫, 高甲科, 张益, 陈进利, 张英泽, 于腾波. 第3腓骨肌应用于韧带重建术的解剖学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(1): 12-15.
[8]	林浩,徐世明,黄永军,牟勇,卓日波,郭洪娟,郑力彬. 踝三角韧带修复重建的解剖与生物力学的基础研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2017, 35(3): 318-321.
[9]	陈清,李杏芮,盛华均,吕发金. 三维模型中踝关节中心定位的研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2016, 34(2): 151-154.
[10]	董伟强，余斌，白波. 不同手术方式治疗踝关节韧带复合体损伤的生物力学评价[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2015, 33(5): 573-576.
[11]	谢龙,黄东,江奕恒,卓日波. 踝关节内侧韧带的解剖结构特点及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2015, 33(3): 246-248.
[12]	申宽宏, 黄东, 吴伟炽, 黄永军, 牟勇. 踝关节骨折合并三角韧带损伤的修复[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2012, 30(6): 696-697.
[13]	邹明, 张焱, 柏广富, 骆宇春, 刘树坤, 赵卫东. 下胫腓联合韧带损伤与体位关系的生物力学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2012, 30(4): 443-446.
[14]	许涛, 刘志刚, 宋良松, 陈雷. 距腓前韧带与踝间后韧带的解剖学研究及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2012, 30(4): 379-381.
[15]	徐洪璋, 余斌. STAR人工踝关节置换术后数字模型的建立和运动仿真[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2011, 29(3): 330-334.