阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者气道及下颌骨三维解剖特点与麻醉气管插管

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2019.05.004

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 498-502.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2019.05.004

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者气道及下颌骨三维解剖特点与麻醉气管插管

纪雪霞¹，　邱倩琪²，　周国斌¹，　马珏¹，　季文进¹，　王志鹏¹，　王晟¹

1.广东省人民医院广东省医学科学院麻醉科，广州 510080； 2.广州市妇女儿童医疗中心麻醉科，广州 510120

收稿日期:2019-06-26 出版日期:2019-09-25 发布日期:2019-09-25
通讯作者: 王晟，主任医师，博士生导师，E-mail:shengwang_gz@163.com
作者简介:纪雪霞（1981-），女，广东汕头人，主治医师，本科，研究方向：临床麻醉气道管理，Tel:13826234272, E-mail:jixx_1414@sina.com
基金资助:
广东省医学科学技术研究基金（A2018277）；广东省中医药局科研项目（20191002）

Three-dimensional anatomical characteristics of airway and mandible and anesthetic intubation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome

JI Xue-xia¹, QIU Qian-qi², ZHOU Guo-bin¹, MA Jue¹, JI Wen-jin¹, WANG Zhi-peng¹, WANG Sheng¹

1. Department of Anesthesiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou510080, China; 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Childrend,s, Medical Center, Guangzhou 510120, China

Received:2019-06-26 Online:2019-09-25 Published:2019-09-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的　评估阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征（Obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome，OSAHS）患者气道及下颌骨三维解剖特点与麻醉气管插管方式和次数。方法　收集2014年到2019年期间于我院行全麻手术且已行头颈部螺旋CT扫描的正常气道及OSAHS气道患者各30例，使用Dolphin软件对患者的气道进行三维重建及气道分析，对患者的下颌骨进行三维重建及测量。同时，记录患者麻醉气管插管的方式和次数。结果　OSAHS患者气道的气道体积、气道的矢状向、水平向和冠状向最小横截面积均较正常患者偏低，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。OSAHS患者的下颌距离较正常患者偏低，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）；下颌角角度与正常患者相比，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。OSAHS患者麻醉插管的方式和次数与正常患者相比，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论　OSAHS患者气道及下颌骨三维解剖特点存在明显差异，利用气道和下颌骨的解剖学特点进行分析，可为临床全麻前气道评估和气管插管提供参考依据。

关键词: 阻塞性呼吸睡眠暂停低通气综合征, 　下颌骨, 　气道, 　气管插管

Abstract: Objective　To evaluate the three-dimensional anatomical characteristics of airway and mandible, the methods and times of anesthesia intubation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). Methods　30 patients with normal airway and 30 patients with OSAHS airway who underwent general anesthesia in our hospital and had been scanned by head and neck spiral CT from March 2016 to March 2019 were collected. Dolphin software was used to reconstruct and analyze the airway of the patients. The three-dimensional reconstruction and measurement of the mandible were performed. At the same time, the methods and times of anesthesia intubation were recorded. Results The airway volume, sagittal minimum cross section area, horizontal minimum cross section area and coronal minimum cross section area in OSAHS patients were significantly lower than those in normal patients (P<0.05). The mandibular distance of OSAHS patients was lower than that of normal patients, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05), whereas the angle of mandible was not significantly different from that of normal patients (P>0.05). The methods and times of anesthesia intubation in OSAHS patients were significantly different from those in normal patients (P<0.05). Conclusion　There are significant differences in three-dimensional anatomical characteristics of airway and mandible in patients with OSAHS. The anatomical characteristics of airway and mandible can be used as a reference for airway evaluation and endotracheal intubation before general anesthesia.

Key words: Obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome, 　Mandible, 　Intubation

中图分类号:

R323.2
R614

纪雪霞, 邱倩琪, 周国斌, 马珏, 季文进, 王志鹏, 王晟. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者气道及下颌骨三维解剖特点与麻醉气管插管[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2019, 37(5): 498-502.

JI Xue-xia, QIU Qian-qi, ZHOU Guo-bin, MA Jue, JI Wen-jin, WANG Zhi-peng, WANG Sheng. Three-dimensional anatomical characteristics of airway and mandible and anesthetic intubation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2019, 37(5): 498-502.

参考文献 17

[1]	Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, et al. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway[J]. Anesthesiology, 2013,118(2): 251-270.
[2]	Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2011,106(5): 617-631.
[3]	Cook TM, Woodall N, Harper J, et al. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: intensive care and emergency departments[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2011, 106(5): 632-642.
[4]	Stuginski-Barbosa J, Porporatti AL, Costa YM, et al. Agreement of the International Classification of Sleep Disorders Criteria with polysomnography for sleep bruxism diagnosis:A preliminary study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 117(1): 61-66.
[5]	Gale SD, Hopkins RO. Effects of hypoxia on the brain: neuroimaging and neuropsychological findings following carbon monoxide poisoning and obstructive sleep apnea[J]. J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 2004,10(1): 60-71.
[6]	Al Lawati NM, Patel SR, Ayas NT. Epidemiology, risk factors, and consequences of obstructive sleep apnea and short sleep duration[J]. Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 2009, 51(4): 285-293.
[7]	张庆泉, 王强, 蔡晓岚, 等. 重症阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者死亡原因分析[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2010, 45(5): 364-368.
[8]	Kim YJ, Hong JS, Hwang YI, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of pharyngeal airway in preadolescent children with different anteroposterior skeletal patterns[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2010, 137(3): 306.e1-11.
[9]	Hong JS, Oh KM, Kim BR, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of pharyngeal airway volume in adults with anterior position of the mandible[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2011,140(4): e161-169.
[10]	Degerliyurt K, Ueki K, Hashiba Y, et al. A comparative CT evaluation of pharyngeal airway changes in class III patients receivingbimaxillary surgery or mandibular setback surgery[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2008, 105(4): 495-502.
[11]	Seo SH, Lee JG, Yu SB, et al. Predictors of difficult intubation defined by the intubation difficulty scale (IDS): predictive value of 7 airway assessment factors[J]. Korean J Anesthesiol ,2012, 63(6): 491-497.
[12]	McPherson D, Vaughan RS, Wilkes AR, et al. A survey of anaesthetic practice in predicting difficult intubation in UK and Europe[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2012, 29(5): 218-22.
[13]	Ulusoy C, Canigur Bavbek N, Tuncer BB, et al. Evaluation of airway dimensions and changes in hyoid bone position following class II functional therapy with activator[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 2014, 72(8): 917-925.
[14]	王幸双, 汪小海, 李文媛, 等. 上呼吸道矢状面解剖学特点与声门暴露程度及插管次数的关系[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2013, 29(12): 1174-1178.
[15]	冯春英, 刘明, 李莹, 等. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征的MRI研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2006, 24(4): 465-467.
[16]	谢雨晨, 陈文栋, 马莉. 困难气道患者三维有限元模型解剖差异的分析[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2019, 23(4): 562-566.
[17]	Shah PN, Sundaram V. Incidence and predictors of difficult mask ventilation and intubation[J]. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, 2012, 28(4): 451-455.

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者气道及下颌骨三维解剖特点与麻醉气管插管

Three-dimensional anatomical characteristics of airway and mandible and anesthetic intubation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 17

相关文章 1

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0