关节镜下双排缝合桥无结修复技术治疗老年肩袖损伤的对照研究

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2021.03.016

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 336-341.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2021.03.016

关节镜下双排缝合桥无结修复技术治疗老年肩袖损伤的对照研究

刘伟乐¹，　郑少伟¹，　黎旭²，　王胤²，　史占军³，　孙春汉¹，　谢福杰¹，　钟浩博¹

1.惠州市第一人民医院骨科，广东惠州 516000；　2.广东医科大学，广东湛江 524023；
3.南方医科大学南方医院关节与骨病外科，广州 510515

收稿日期:2020-06-14 出版日期:2021-05-25 发布日期:2021-06-02
通讯作者: 郑少伟，主治医师，E-mail:522948721@qq.com
基金资助:
惠州市科技局（2020Y049）；广东省中医药局科研项目（20202215）；国家自然基金（81871757）；惠州市科技局（2012Y053）；惠州市科技局（2015B040010004）；2015、2017惠州市第一人民医院科研培育与创新基金项目

Comparative study of arthroscopic double row suture bridge " without knot" repair technology in the treatment of elderly rotator cuff injury

Liu Weile¹, Zheng Shaowei¹, Li Xu²， Wang Yin², Shi Zhanjun³, Sun Chunhan ¹, Xie Fujie¹， Zhong Haobo¹

1.Department of Orthopedics, Huizhou First Hospital, Huizhou 516000, Guangdong Province, China; 2. Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524023, Guangdong Province, China; 3.Department of Orthopedics Surgery，Nanfang Hospital，Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China

Received:2020-06-14 Online:2021-05-25 Published:2021-06-02
About author:刘伟乐（1982-），副主任医师，主要研究方向为骨关节疾病的基础和临床，E-mail:zswljq@126.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的　关节镜下采取双排缝合桥无结与有结修复术治疗老年肩袖损伤的效果对比分析。方法　前瞻性入选惠州市第一人民医院骨科2016年1月至2019年2月期间收治的69例老年肩袖损伤病患者，随机分配为有结组（关节镜下行双排缝合桥有结修复技术）35例与无结组（关节镜下行双排缝合桥无结修复技术）34例，比较两组不同程度损伤患者术后3、6月的关节功能及再撕裂发生率。结果　基线资料及术前UCLA、ASES、Constant-Murley评分组间无显著性差异（P>0.05）。术后无结组及有结组 UCLA、ASES、Constant-Murley评分均较术前好转（P<0.001）。在整体人群以及轻-中度撕裂亚组中，术后无结组和有结组之间UCLA、ASES、Constant-Murley无显著差异（P>0.05）。重-巨大撕裂亚组中，无结组的UCLA、ASES、Constant-Murley显著优于有结组（P <0.05），两组术后肩关节前屈与外旋活动度差异不显著（P>0.05）。有结组再撕裂发生率倾向于高于无结组（17.1% vs 2.9%，P=0.051）。结论　老年肩袖损伤采取双排缝合桥有结及无结修复术均有效可行，对于重-巨大撕裂的患者，无结技术更具有优势。

关键词: 老年人, 　肩袖损伤, 　缝合桥技术, 　肩关节, 　关节镜

Abstract: Objective　To compare the effect of double-row suture bridge " without knot" and "with knot" repair technology under the arthroscopy for the treatment of elderly rotator cuff injury.　Methods　Sixty-nine elderly patients with rotator cuff injury admitted to Huizhou people’s Hospital from January 2016 to February 2019 were prospectively collected and 35 cases were randomly asigned into a control groups (articular endoscope double-row suture bridge "with knot" repair technique ) and 34 cases were into an observation group (arthroscope double-row suture bridge "without knot" repair technique). The joint function and the retear rate with different degree of injury were compared between the two groups 3 months and 6 months after operation.　Results　There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristic, UCLA, ASES, and Constant-Murley scores between the observation group and the control group before treatment (P> 0.05). However, at 6 months after operation, the UCLA, ASES, and Constant-Murley scores of the two groups were better than those before operation (P<0.001). There was no significant differences in the UCLA、ASES、Constant-Murley scores between the observation group and control group after operation from all the patients in the whole group and light-moderate tears degree subgroups. Among the subgroups with heavy-large tears, the UCLA, ASES, and Constant-Murley scores of the observation group were significantly better than those of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant differences in the antexion of the shoulder joint and the degree of external rotation of the two groups after operation (P＞0.05). The incidence of re-tearing in the control group was higher than that in the observation group (17.1% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.051). Conclusions Both double-row suture bridge "with knot" and "without knot" repairs are effective and feasible in elderly patients with rotator cuff injury. For patients with heavy-large tears degree, the "without-knot" technique may be more advantageous.

Key words: The elderly;　Rotator cuff injury;　Suture bridge technique;　Shoulder joint, arthroscope

中图分类号:

R658

刘伟乐, 郑少伟, 黎旭, 王胤, 史占军, 孙春汉, 谢福杰, 钟浩博. 关节镜下双排缝合桥无结修复技术治疗老年肩袖损伤的对照研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(3): 336-341.

Liu Weile, Zheng Shaowei, Li Xu, Wang Yin, Shi Zhanjun, Sun Chunhan, Xie Fujie, Zhong Haobo. Comparative study of arthroscopic double row suture bridge " without knot" repair technology in the treatment of elderly rotator cuff injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2021, 39(3): 336-341.

参考文献 21

[1]	张辉, 庄万强, 骆勇刚, 等. 关节镜下单排与双排缝合桥修复技术治疗老年肩袖损伤的对照研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2019, 5(6):337-341. DOI：
10	3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.06.007.
[2]	黄彪, 彭小英, 王新亮, 等. 肩关节镜下单排与双排缝合桥修复技术治疗老年肩袖损伤的效果[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2019, 40(8):946-947. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1256.2019.08.009.
[3]	杨建水.肩袖修复术后再撕裂相关因素的研究[J].医学信息,2020,33(1):46-50. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.01.016.
[4]	Tashjian RZ. Epidemiology, natural history, and indications for treatment of rotator cuff tears[J]. Clin Sports Med, 2012, 31(4): 589-604. DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2012.07.001.
[5]	Bennett WF. Arthroscopic repair of full thickness supraspinatus tears (Small to medium): a prospective study with 2 to 4 year follow up [J]. Arthroscopy, 2003, 19(3): 249-256. DOI: 10.1053/jars.2003.50083.
[6]	Deprés-Tremblay G, Chevrier A , Snow M , et al. Rotator cuff repair: a review of surgical techniques, animal models, and new technologies under development[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2016, 25(12):2078-2085. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.06.009.
[7]	黄成龙, 潘界恩, 蔡震海, 等. 关节镜下缝线桥技术治疗老年创伤性肩关节脱位合并肩袖损伤的疗效评价[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2016, 22(6): 35-39. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2016.06.010.
[8]	傅仰攀, 黄长明, 尹宗生. 全肩关节镜与关节镜辅助治疗肩袖损伤的比较 [J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2016, 24(20): 1839-1843. DOI: 10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2016.20.04.
[9]	刘少华, 李宏, 孙亚英, 等. 关节镜下单排与缝线桥技术修复中型肩袖撕裂—临床与核磁共振评价 [J]. 中国运动医学杂志, 2017, 36(2): 97-100, 105. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6710.2017.02.001.
[10]	陈伟雄, 薛厚军, 刘青华, 等. 关节镜下不同修补术治疗肩袖损伤的临床效果[J].中国临床解剖学杂志, 2020, 38(01):73-77. DOI：10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.015.
[11]	Shon MS , Koh KH , Lim TK , et al. Arthroscopic partial repair of irreparable rotator cuff tears: preoperative factors associated with outcome deterioration over 2 years[J]. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2015, 43(8):1965-1975. DOI: 10.1177/0363546515585122.
[12]	郑鸿, 赵甲军, 谭宏昌, 等. 关节镜下缝线桥与传统双排技术修复全层肩袖撕裂的比较 [J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2017, 19(9):806-809. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2017.09.013.
[13]	魏俊成, 颜世昌, 彭俊洋,等. 关节镜下单纯双排缝合与缝合桥技术修复肩袖损伤的临床观察[J]. 中国医师进修杂志, 2018, 41(9):833-836. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2018.09.017.
[14]	潘界恩, 陈刚, 黄成龙, 等. 改良压配式双排缝合技术与传统单双排缝合技术在肩袖大型撕裂修补中的生物力学比较[C]// 2015年浙江省骨科学学术年会. 2015.
[15]	周勇伟, 杨骐宁, 曹扬. 关节镜单排与双排缝线桥技术修复年轻中型肩袖撕裂患者的疗效[J]. 中国医师杂志, 2018, 20(7):1075-1077. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-1372.2018.07.037.
[16]	Warth RJ, Greenspoon JA, Bhatia S, et al. Arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair using a knotless, interconnected technique[J]. Oper Tech Orthop, 2015, 25(1): 43⁃48. DOI: 10.1053/j.oto.2014.10.003.
[17]	] Shin SJ, Kook SH, Rao N, et al. Clinical outcomes of modified Mason-Allen single-row repair for bursal-sided partialthickness rotator cuff tear: Comparison with the double-rowsuture- bridge technique[J]. Am J Sport Med, 2015, 43(8): 1976-1982. DOI: 10.1177/0363546515587718.
[18]	Kim SJ, Kim SH, Moon HS, et al. Footprint contact area and interface pressure comparison between the knotless and knot- tying transosseous- equivalent technique for rotator cuff repair[J]. Arthroscopy, 2016, 32(1): 7-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.07.004.
[19]	裴杰, 王青. 肩袖撕裂双排缝合技术与缝线桥技术的疗效对比分析 [J]. 中国运动医学杂志, 36(1):9-13, 20. DOI：10.16038/j.1000-6710.2017.01.002.
[20]	Warth RJ, Dornan G J, James E W, et al. Clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears with and without platelet-rich product supplementation: a meta-analysis and meta-regression[J]. Arthroscopy, 2015, 31(2):306-320. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.09.007.
[21]	Carr AJ, Cooper CD, Campbell MK, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [the UK Rotator Cuff Surgery (UKUFF) randomised trial][J]. Health Technol Assess, 2015, 19(80):1-217. DOI: 10.3310/hta19800.

关节镜下双排缝合桥无结修复技术治疗老年肩袖损伤的对照研究

Comparative study of arthroscopic double row suture bridge " without knot" repair technology in the treatment of elderly rotator cuff injury

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王鑫, 马超, 黄金勇, 谢增如. 膝关节滑膜皱襞的分型及滑膜皱襞综合征的诊治[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(5): 627-630.
[2]	李明, 贾丙申, 焦拓, 张英, 付昆. 非全程应用止血带对关节镜联合胫骨高位截骨术围手术期结果的影响[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(4): 475-480.
[3]	陈帅, 易陈鹏, 王杰, 宫大伟, 焦峰, 黄华扬, 郑小飞, 王海彬. 胫侧副韧带与内侧半月板的关系解剖研究及临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(5): 519-522.
[4]	张磊, 何雪, 周鑫, 熊鹿静, 张梦瑶. 肱骨大结节上方的解剖分型及临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(5): 513-517.
[5]	葛新江, 　游建军, 　刘晓峰, 　马英. 关节镜辅助MIPPO技术治疗老年Schatzker Ⅱ~Ⅲ型胫骨平台骨折的疗效及预后研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(3): 342-345.
[6]	傅福仁, 谢义德. 改良矫正术治疗老年上睑松弛136例临床体会[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(2): 228-230.
[7]	任中楷, 张英泽, 汪建, 张益, 陈进利, 张春佳, 于腾波. 肩胛骨关节盂长短径解剖测量及临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2020, 38(4): 381-384.
[8]	陈伟雄, 薛厚军, 刘青华, 潘磊. 关节镜下不同修补术治疗肩袖损伤的临床效果[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2020, 38(1): 73-77.
[9]	刘洋, 梁涛, 张磊, 刘刚, 易刚, 郭晓光, 周鑫, 扶世杰. 3D打印辅助胫骨高位开放截骨联合关节镜治疗膝内翻畸形临床疗效分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2020, 38(1): 67-72.
[10]	易刚,张磊,杨静,郭晓光,刘洋,覃波,汪国友,扶世杰. 肱二头肌长头肌腱病变与肩袖损伤的相关性及临床意义分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2019, 37(2): 196-200.
[11]	贾川,徐建达,谢子康,瞿玉兴. 臀肌挛缩松解联合髌骨支持带张力重建治疗弹响髋合并膝前痛[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2018, 36(6): 683-689.
[12]	张磊,陈亨树,祁冀,曾炎,关钛元,覃波,徐洁,马丽,扶世杰. 喙突的解剖形态学测量及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2018, 36(6): 606-610.
[13]	李建赤,刘岗,薛小华,谭加群,徐自强,吴春辉. 老年人股骨转子间骨折PFNA和DHS内固定术疗效的临床研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2017, 35(5): 571-575.
[14]	黄媛霞,段永壮,陶金刚,明海武. 关节镜下保留残端与非保残重建前交叉韧带的疗效比较[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2017, 35(5): 564-566.
[15]	刘海龙,丁晶,甘煜东. 膝关节脱位的早期诊断及微创治疗方法[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2017, 35(5): 559-563.