惯量主轴在桡骨粗隆精确定位中的应用研究

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.2.10

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 168-172.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.2.10

惯量主轴在桡骨粗隆精确定位中的应用研究

王发圣，　陈杰，　谢昀*

福建医科大学附属第一医院创伤骨科，福州 350005

收稿日期:2020-08-21 出版日期:2022-03-25 发布日期:2022-04-11
通讯作者: 谢昀，主任医师，硕士生导师，E-mail: xyxlr@ 126.com
作者简介:王发圣（1983-），男，副主任医师，博士，主要从事骨科的基础与临床研究，E-mail: wfshine@foxmail.com

Study on the application of inertia principal axis in the precise positioning of the radial tuberosity

Wang Fasheng, Chen Jie, Xie Yun*

Department of Orthopedic Trauma, First Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China

Received:2020-08-21 Online:2022-03-25 Published:2022-04-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的　根据CT图像测定水平面上桡骨粗隆相对于桡骨长轴的旋转角度。方法　44例桡骨标本（左侧17例，右侧27例）CT扫描图像，观察桡骨粗隆形态，选择标志点。根据CT原始图像信息应用Mimics21.0构建桡骨三维模型，分别计算生成桡骨的惯量主轴，建立惯量主轴参考坐标系。统计每例标本桡骨粗隆后侧嵴标志点在水平面上相对桡骨长轴的旋转角度。结果　桡骨粗隆后侧嵴普遍存在。桡骨的惯量主轴与桡骨的相对位置是稳定的。桡骨粗隆后侧嵴在该水平面坐标参考系上相对桡骨主旋转轴的角度为（82.93 ± 5.55）°。结论　基于惯量主轴建立的解剖参考坐标系稳定性好，可精确定位桡骨粗隆。

关键词: 桡骨粗隆, 　惯量主轴, 　解剖参考坐标系

Abstract: Objective　To determine the rotation angle of the radial tuberosity relative to the major axis of the radius at the horizontal plane according to theits computed tomography(CT) image.　Methods　CT images of 44 independent radial specimens (17 on the left and 27 on the right) were scanned to observe the morphology of the radial tuberosity and select the marker points from it. The Mimics21.0 was used to construct the radial three-dimensional (3D) model based on the original CT image information. Then the inertia principal axis of radial was calculated and generated, and the reference coordinate frame of inertia principal axis was established. The rotation angles of the posterior ridge marks on the radial tuberosity on the horizontal plane relative to the major axis in each specimen were calculated and recorded.　Results　The posterior ridge of radial tuberosity was ubiquitous. The relative position between inertia principal axis and radius was stable. The rotation angle of the posterior ridge of the radial tuberosity relative to the major axis of the radius in the horizontal coordinate frame was (82.93±5.55)°.　Conclusions　The anatomical reference coordinate frame based on the principal axis of inertia is stable and can be used to precisely locate the radial tuberosity.

Key words: , Radial tuberosity, 　Inertia principal axis, 　Anatomical reference coordinate frame

中图分类号:

R322

王发圣, 陈杰, 谢昀. 惯量主轴在桡骨粗隆精确定位中的应用研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(2): 168-172.

Wang Fasheng, Chen Jie, Xie Yun. Study on the application of inertia principal axis in the precise positioning of the radial tuberosity [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(2): 168-172.

参考文献 14

[1]	Mazzocca AD, Cohen M, Berkson E, et al. The anatomy of the bicipital tuberosity and distal biceps tendon[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2007, 16(1): 122-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.04.012.
[2]	Hutchinson HL, Gloystein D, Gillespie M. Distal biceps tendon insertion: an anatomic study[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2008, 17(2): 342-346. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.05.005.
[3]	Foote J, Raman A. A relation between the principal axes of inertia and ligand binding[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2000, 97(3): 978-983. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.3.978.
[4]	Krantz SG, Mccarthy JE, Parks HR, et al. Geometric characterizations of centroids of simplices[J]. J Math Anal Appl, 2006, 316(1): 87-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.04.046.
[5]	Morrey B, Askew L, An K, et al. Rupture of the distal tendon of the biceps brachii. A biomechanical study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1985, 67(3): 418-421.
[6]	El-Hawary R, Macdermid JC, Faber KJ, et al. Distal biceps tendon repair: comparison of surgical techniques[J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2003, 28(3): 496-502. DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2003.50081.
[7]	Rochefort G, Champagnat F, Le Besnerais G, et al. An improved observation model for super-resolution under affine motion[J]. IEEE Trans Image Process, 2006, 15(11): 3325-3337. DOI: 10.1109/tip.2006.881996.
[8]	Fan YZ, Luo LP, Djuric M, et al. Extracting cross-sectional clinical images based on their principal axes of inertia[J]. Scanning, 2017, 2017: 1468596. DOI: 10.1155/2017/1468596.
[9]	Miranda DL, Rainbow MJ, Leventhal EL, et al. Automatic determination of anatomical coordinate systems for three-dimensional bone models of the isolated human knee[J]. J Biomech, 2010, 43(8): 1623-1636. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.036.
[10]	Canovas F, Roussanne Y, Captier G, et al. Study of carpal bone morphology and position in three dimensions by image analysis from computed tomography scans of the wrist[J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2004, 26(3): 186-190. DOI: 10.1007/s00276-003-0207-x.
[11]	Kim SG, Kim DS, Choi SC, et al. The relationship between three-dimensional principal rotations and mandibular deviation[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endos, 2010, 110(5): e52-e60. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.07.006.
[12]	Best G, Mack Z, Pichora D, et al. Differences in the rotation axes of the scapholunate joint during flexion-extension and radial-ulnar deviation motions[J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2019, 44(9): 772-778. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.05.001.
[13]	Camacho DLA, Ledoux WR, Rohr ES, et al. A three-dimensional, anatomically detailed foot model: a foundation for a finite element simulation and means of quantifying foot-bone position[J]. J Rehabil Res Dev, 2002, 39(3): 401-410. PMID: 12173760.
[14]	Aguado-Henche S, Morante-Martínez P, Cristóbal-Aguado S, et al. Study of human radius construction systematics: evaluation by DXA in dry bone[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2019, 29(2): 389-396. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-018-2311-y.

[1]	江剑宏, 段仁鹏, 李晓锋. 国人胆道三维重建解剖变异应用研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 1-4.
[2]	郭红志, 王瑜, 张加琪, 梁海彬, 马梓玮, 冯伟, 吴忧, 司子燚. 血管铸型结合CT三维模型评估先兆子痫胎盘血管结构[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 5-10.
[3]	李佳伟, 张静, 李灿然, 兰文杰, 籍庆余, 郭志勇, 张云凤, 刘启, 陈清威, 李筱贺. 蒙古族人群股骨近端解剖参数X线测量[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 11-16.
[4]	李琨, 张燕, 郭冉, 郝咪咪, 吴轩宇, 徐艺芳, 王超群, 马文童, 张灵淇, 杨宏宇, 李志军, 张少杰, 王星. 儿童及青少年枕颈角与后枕颈角数字化测量及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 17-20.
[5]	王兴航, 丁佳媛, 李放, 包翠芬, 阎丽菁. 人参皂苷Rg1通过抑制NLRP3炎症小体途径减轻氧糖剥夺/复供后小胶质细胞炎症反应[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 33-41.
[6]	吴研飞, 马剑雄, 卢斌, 王颖, 柏豪豪, 靳洪震, 马信龙. CT后处理技术重建CT值与终板抗压强度的相关性研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 71-76.
[7]	庄万强, 唐毅, 骆勇刚, 张辉. 关节镜联合胫骨高位截骨术对髌骨位置及髌股关节功能影响的早中期回顾性研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 77-82.
[8]	罗鹰, 窦伟誉, 吴小杭, 陈璟昆, 彭昌贵, 潘剑英 . 微创海马钢板内固定治疗跟骨骨折并发症的影响因素[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 83-88.
[9]	陈俊臣, 曹文英, 罗燕君, 何婉仪, 朱真真, 彭志强. 抽吸取栓术与抽吸结合支架取栓术治疗脑前循环栓塞疗效比较[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 89-93.
[10]	胡硕红, 郑学彬, 李富杰, 王鸿. 种植基台材料对种植体周围软硬组织影响的前瞻性临床研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 94-98.
[11]	林杰, 金甬, 庞清江. 胃肠道菌群与骨质疏松症关系的研究进展[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 109-111.
[12]	张悦, 蔡兴博, 张必欢, 王斌, 徐永清. 全腕关节置换术后腕关节生物力学研究进展[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 112-114.
[13]	陈仁, 杨胜波. 咬肌的解剖与临床应用研究进展[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 115-117.
[14]	徐浩铜, 徐万宇, 吴毅, 何明静, 雷秀兵, 田伏洲. 慢性胰腺炎脾门假性囊肿分类及其与SPH关系的影像学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(6): 652-656.
[15]	刘展, 陶胜忠, 卢慧鹏, 王在斌, 睢豫擘, 牛光明. MRI三维观察血管压迫神经根在原发性三叉神经痛患者和非疼痛人群中差异[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(6): 667-674.

惯量主轴在桡骨粗隆精确定位中的应用研究

Study on the application of inertia principal axis in the precise positioning of the radial tuberosity

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 14

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0