3D打印椎间融合器应用于颈椎病的临床疗效和矢状位平衡随访

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2023.3.16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨3D打印椎间融合器应用于颈椎前路减压椎间融合术（anterior cervical discectomy and fusion，ACDF）治疗单节段颈椎病的临床疗效和矢状位平衡。方法回顾性分析我院2017年6月~2019年6月行单节段ACDF手术的60例颈椎病患者，其中实验组30例应用3D打印钛合金椎间融合器，对照组30例应用聚醚醚酮（PEEK）椎间融合器。分别记录两组患者手术指标、平均住院日、各阶段随访的VAS、JOA评分和相关影像参数，评估疗效和矢状位平衡。结果实验组手术时间（76.1±5.7）min和术中出血量（33.7±6.5）mL，均少于对照组的（85.5±6.5）min和（45.3±5.8）mL，差异有显著性（P<0.05）。两组患者术前JOA和VAS评分分别为（4.8±2.3）分、（7.7±1.5）分和（5.1±2.1）分、（8.0±1.6）分，术后末次随访分别为（15.5±1.3）分、（1.0±0.6）分和（14.3±1.5）分、（1.8±0.7）分，两项评分较术前均有明显改善，差异有显著性。组间对比末次随访数据显示统计学差异（P<0.05）。术前两组各影像参数组间比较无统计学差异（P>0.05），术后各时段的影像参数与本组术前相比有明显改善（P<0.05），末次随访时实验组与对照组椎间高度分别为（6.8±1.3）mm、（5.7±1.4）mm，椎间角度分别为（7.3±1.3）°、（6.0±1.4）°，C2~7 Cobb角分别为（23.6±5.3）°、（19.3±5.4）°，T1倾斜角分别为（24.3±2.2）°和（20.3±2.6）°，实验组明显高于对照组，差异存在统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 3D打印钛合金椎间融合器应用于ACDF手术治疗单节段颈椎病临床效果良好，在改善并维持椎间高度、颈椎矢状位平衡等方面优于传统PEEK融合器。

关键词: 颈椎病； , , 颈椎前路间盘切除融合术； , , 3D打印； , , 椎间融合器

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and sagittal balance changes of a 3D-printed interbody fusion cage in the treatment of single-level cervical spondylosis during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods Retrospective analysis of 60 patients with cervical spondylosis who underwent single-segment ACDF operation in our hospital from June 2017 to June 2019 was performed, thereinto, the experimental group consisted of 30 patients with 3D printed titanium interbody fusion apparatus, the control group was 30 patients treated with polyether ether ketone (PEEK) interbody fusion cage. Related indexes, average length of stay, VAS score at each follow-up period, JOA score and related image parameters, evaluation of curative effect and sagittal balance changes during surgery in the two groups were recorded. Results The operative time of the experimental group was (76.1±5.7) min and the intraoperative blood loss was (33.7±6.5) ml, both of which were lower than the control group ((85.5±6.5) min and (45.3±5.8) mL), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Preoperative JOA and VAS scores of two groups were (4.8±2.3) points, (7.7±1.5) points and (5.1±2.1) points, (8.0±1.6) points respectively. The last postoperative follow-up JOA and VAS scores of two groups were (15.5±1.3) points, (1.0±0.6) points and (14.3±1.5) points, (1.8±0.7) points, respectively, the two scores were significantly improved compared with those before surgery, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Between groups, the last follow-up data showed statistical difference (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in comparison of preoperative imaging parameters between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the group before operation, the postoperative image parameters of each period were significantly improved (P<0.05). At the last follow-up, intervertebral height and angle, C2-7 Cobb angle and T1 inclination angle between experimental group and control group were (6.8±1.3, 5.7±1.4) mm, (7.3±1.3, 6.0±1.4) °, (23.6±5.3, 19.3±5.4) ° and (24.3±2.2, 20.3±2.6) °, respectively. The experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions The application of 3D printed titanium alloy interbody fusion cage in the treatment of single level cervical spondylosis in ACDF has a good clinical effect. It is superior to the traditional PEEK fusion cage in improving and maintaining intervertebral height and angle, cervical sagittal balance and other aspects.

Key words: Cervical spondylosis; , , Anterior cervical discectomy fusion; , , 3D printing; , , Intervertebral fusion cage

中图分类号:

R653

王建华, 吴迪, 孙贺, 张义龙, 信丽丽, 李乐. 3D打印椎间融合器应用于颈椎病的临床疗效和矢状位平衡随访[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(3): 342-348.

Wang Jianhua, Wu Di, Sun He, Zhang Yilong, Xin Lili, Li Le. Follow-up of the clinical efficacy and sagittal balance of 3D printing spine intervertebral fusion cage in treatment of cervical spondylosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(3): 342-348.

参考文献 29

[1]	董振宇, 楚戈, 黄异飞, 等. 人工颈椎间盘假体联合零切迹椎间融合内固定系统置入治疗颈椎病: 2年随访[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2015, 19(22): 3503-3507. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2015.22.012.
[2]	Wang BY, Wu TK, Liu H, et al. Intraoperative conversion of artificial cervical disc replacement to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for iatrogenic fracture: a rare case report[J]. Medicine, 2017, 96(47): e8917. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008917.
[3]	Li ZH, Huang J, Zhang Z, et al. A comparison of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and corpectomy in patients with 4-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a Minimum 2-year follow-up study[J]. Clin Spine Surg,2017, 30(5): E540-E546. DOI: 10.1097/BSD. 0000000 000000212.
[4]	陈丹华, 葛许锋, 成红兵, 等. 颈椎桥型锁定融合器在颈椎前路减压融合术中的应用[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(1): 32-35. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202001008.
[5]	Park JY, Choi KY, Moon BJ, et al. Subsidence after single-level anterior cervical fusion with a stang-alone cage[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2018, 33: 83-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn. 2016.01.042.
[6]	Jain S, Eltorai AE, Ruttiman R, et al. Advances in spinal interbody cage[J]. 2016, 8(3): 278-284. DOI: 10.1111/os.12264.
[7]	张剑, 冯新民, 张亮, 颈椎椎间融合器研究进展[J]. 国际骨科学杂志, 2019, 40(6): 329-332. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8478.2003.08.021.
[8]	吴天顺, 陈扬, 蓝涛, 等. 脊柱打印椎间融合器材料的初步展望[J]. 生物骨科材料与临床研究, 2018, 15(1): 58-63. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5972.2018.01.015.
[9]	王林楠, 杨曦, 宋跃明. 3D打印技术在椎间融合临床应用的研究进展[J]. 华西医学, 2018, 33(9): 1061-1067. DOI: 10.7507/1002-0179.201809010.
[10]	Wei F, Xu NF, Li ZH, et al. A prospective randomized cohort study on 3D-printed artificial vertebral body in single-level anterior cervical corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2020, 8(17): 1070-1079. DOI: 10.2103 7/atm-19-4719.
[11]	Lin SY, Chen DC, Lin CL, et a1. Risk of acute coronary syndrome in patients with cervical spondylosis[J]. Atherosclerosis, 2018, 271(35): 136-141. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.02.029.
[12]	Wang T, Wang H, Liu S, et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis[J]. Medicine, 2016, 95(49): e5437. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005437.
[13]	李玉伟, 王海蛟, 崔巍, 等. 前路颈椎间盘切除3D打印微孔钛合金椎间融合器与聚醚醚酮椎间融合器椎间融合术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的疗效对比[J] .中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2021, 31(1): 16-24. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2021.01.03.
[14]	吴敏飞, 王洋, 矫健航, 等. 3D打印椎间融合器在脊髓型颈椎病椎间盘摘除减压融合内固定术的应用效果[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2019, 12(2): 98-101. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2019.02.04.
[15]	郭山强, 王帅, 盖利, 等. 颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后颈椎矢状位参数变化及其对临床疗效的影响[J]. 骨科, 2019, 10(1): 8-13. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-857 3.2019.01.002.
[16]	Rao HM, Huang YM，Lan ZB，et aI．Does preoperative T1 slope and cervical lordosis mismatching affect surgical outcomes after laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondyiotic myeIopathy[J]? World Neurosurg,2019, 130: e687-e693. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu. 2019. 06.193.
[17]	王海波, 王元, 孙璟川, 等. 颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术术中恢复椎间隙自然高度对术后疗效的影响[J]. 脊柱外科杂志, 2018, 16(5): 284-288. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2957.2018.05.007.
[18]	邢秋娟, 赵东峰, 戴薇薇, 等. 颈椎曲度异常对椎间盘应力分布影响的有限元分析[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2019, 22(1): 114-117. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-02 87.2019.01.046.
[19]	毛克政, 高延征, 毛克亚, 等. 电子束熔融制备多孔钛合金融合器的性能和椎间融合效果[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2020, 36(12): 1126-1132. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20200517-00361.
[20]	王林楠, 杨曦, 宋跃明. 3D打印技术在椎间融合临床应用的研究进展[J]. 华西医学, 2018, 33(9): 1061-1067. DOI: 10.7507/1002-0179. 201809010.
[21]	Wu SH, Li Y, Zhang YQ, et al. Porous titanium-6 aluminum-4 vanadium cage has better osseointegration and less micromotion than a poly-ether-ether-ketone cage in sheep vertebral fusion [J]. Artif Organs, 2013, 37(12): E191-E201. DOI: 10.1111/aor.12153.
[22]	杨旭, 赵晓峰, 齐德泰, 等. 3D打印ACT钛金骨小梁椎间融合器行颈椎前路减压融合后颈椎的矢状位平衡变化[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2020, 24(36): 5741-5748. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2916.
[23]	Spetzger U, Frasca M, Knig SA. Surgical planning, manufacturing and implantation of an individualized cervical fusion titanium cage using patient-specific data[J]. Eur Spine J, 2016, 25(7): 2239-2246. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4473-9.
[24]	Cheng J，Liu P，Sun D，et a1. Correlation of cervical and thomcic jnlet sagillal parameters by MRI and radioFaphy in patients with cervical spondylosis[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2019, 98(7): e14393. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014393.
[25]	Weng C, Wang J, Tuchman A, et a1. Influence of T1 slope on the cervical sagittal balance jn degenerative cervical spine: an analysis using kinematic MRI[J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2016, 4l(3): 185-190. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3678-z.
[26]	Knott PT, Mardjetko SM, Techy F. The use of the T1 sagittal angle in predicting overall sagittal balance of the spine[J]. Spine J, 2010, 10(11): 994⁃998. DOI: 10.1016 /j.spinee.2010.08.031.
[27]	Tang JA, Scheer JK, Smith JS, et al. The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery[J]. Neurosurgery, 2015, 76(Suppl 1): S14-S21. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.08.189.
[28]	Yokoyama K, Kawanishi M, Yamada M, et al. Age-related variations in global spinal alignment and sagittal balance in asymptomatic Japanese adults[J]. Neurol Res, 2017, 39(5): 414-418. DOI: 10.1080/01616412.2017.1296654.
[29]	余文超, 袁文, 陈华江, 等. 脊髓型颈椎病颈前路手术对术后颈椎矢状位平衡参数的影响[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2018, 38(21): 1285-1292. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2018.21.001.