退行性腰椎侧凸椎管形态学特征及其与脊柱-骨盆参数的相关性分析

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2024.2.08

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 159-167.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2024.2.08

退行性腰椎侧凸椎管形态学特征及其与脊柱-骨盆参数的相关性分析

吴嘉宝^1,2，孙伯林^1,2，邢锴^1,2，张宁³，周荣平^1,2，陈江伟^1,2，刘志礼^1,2，刘家明^1,2*

1. 南昌大学第一附属医院骨科，南昌 330006； 2.江西省脊柱脊髓重点实验室，南昌 330006；
3. 南昌大学第一附属医院影像科，南昌 330006

收稿日期:2023-05-30 出版日期:2024-03-25 发布日期:2024-04-22
作者简介:吴嘉宝（1996 -），男，江西赣州人，在读硕士，研究方向：脊柱外科，E-mail：1183695904@qq.com
基金资助:
江西省“双千计划”首批培养类项目；中央引导地方科技发展资金（No.20222ZDH04095）；江西省重点研发计划项目（No.20223BBG71S02）

Anatomical features of the spinal canal in degenerative lumbar scoliosis and its correlation with spinal-pelvic parameters

Wu Jiabao^1,2, Sun Bolin^1,2, Xing Kai^1,2, Zhang Ning³, Zhou Rongping^1,2, Chen Jiangwei^1,2, Liu Zhili^1,2, Liu Jiaming^1,2*

1. Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China; 2. Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Spine and Spinal Cord, Nanchang 330006, China; 3. Department of Imaging, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China

Received:2023-05-30 Online:2024-03-25 Published:2024-04-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的测量退行性腰椎侧凸（degenerative lumbar scoliosis，DLS）患者椎管形态学参数，分析其变化规律及其与脊柱-骨盆参数的相关性。方法收集DLS患者50例，分别在X线、CT及MRI上测量腰弯Cobb角、腰椎前凸角、顶椎位置、顶椎偏移距离、顶椎旋转度、顶椎侧方和前方滑移距离、骨盆投射角（pelvic incidence，PI）、骨盆倾斜角（pelvic tilt，PT）、骶骨倾斜角（sacral slope，SS）、凹侧和凸侧椎间孔高度、宽度和横截面积、硬膜囊横截面积、横径和前后径，分析椎管形态学变化规律及其与脊柱-骨盆参数的相关性。结果 DLS患者的顶椎位于L2~L3椎体；其椎管相关参数最小处均位于L4/5节段；椎间孔相关参数最小处均位于L2/3节段。DLS患者L2/3水平椎管及椎间孔的形态学参数与年龄、腰弯Cobb角及顶椎偏移距离存在相关性（P<0.05）；而L5/S1水平椎间孔的形态学参数与PI、SS存在相关性（P<0.05）。结论 DLS患者椎管最狭窄处多位于L4/5节段，而椎间孔最狭窄处多位于L2/3节段。顶椎区椎管狭窄程度、椎间孔狭窄程度与脊柱-骨盆参数之间存在一定的相关性。

关键词: 退行性腰椎侧凸； , , 椎管； , , 椎间孔； , , 解剖学； , , 测量

Abstract: Objective To analyze the change pattern and its correlation with spinal-pelvic parameters by measuring morphological parameters of the spinal canal in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS). Methods Fifty cases of DLS patients were collected. Cobb angle of lumbar bending, anterior lumbar convexity angle, position of the parietal vertebra, distance of parietal offset, rotation of the parietal vertebra, distance of lateral and anterior slip of the parietal vertebra, pelvic parameters PI, PT, SS, height, width and cross-sectional area of the intervertebral foramen on the concave and convex sides, cross-sectional area of the dural sac, transverse diameter and anterior-posterior diameter were measured on X-ray, CT and MRI, respectively. The patterns of morphological changes in the spinal canal and their correlation with spinal-pelvic parameters were analyzed. Results The parietal vertebra of DLS patients were located in the L2~L3 vertebra. The lowest spinal canal parameters were located at L4/5 level, the lowest intervertebral foramen parameters were located at L2/3 level. Morphological parameters of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen at the L2/3 level correlated with age, cobb angle of lumbar bending, and distance of parietal offset in patients with DLS (P<0.05); while morphological parameters of the intervertebral foramen at the L5/S1 level were correlated with PI and SS (P<0.05). Conclusions The most narrowed spinal canal in DLS patients is mostly located at the L4/5 segment, while the most narrowed intervertebral foramen is mostly located at the L2/3 segment. There is a correlation between the degree of spinal canal stenosis and foraminal stenosis in the parietal region and spinal-pelvic parameters.

Key words: Degenerative lumbar scoliosis; , Spinal canal; , Intervertebral foramen; , Anatomy, Measurement

中图分类号:

R323.33

吴嘉宝, 孙伯林, 邢锴, 张宁, 周荣平, 陈江伟, 刘志礼, 刘家明. 退行性腰椎侧凸椎管形态学特征及其与脊柱-骨盆参数的相关性分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(2): 159-167.

Wu Jiabao, Sun Bolin, Xing Kai, Zhang Ning, Zhou Rongping, Chen Jiangwei, Liu Zhili, Liu Jiaming. Anatomical features of the spinal canal in degenerative lumbar scoliosis and its correlation with spinal-pelvic parameters[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2024, 42(2): 159-167.

参考文献

[1] Kiram A, Hu Z, Man GC, et al. The role of paraspinal muscle degeneration in coronal imbalance in patients with degenerative scoliosis[J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2022, 12(11): 5101-5113. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-222.
[2] Ding JZ, Kong C, Sun XY, et al. Perioperative complications and risk factors in degenerative lumbar scoliosis surgery for patients older than 70 years of age[J]. Clin Interv Aging, 2019, 14: 2195-2203. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S218204.
[3] Kobayashi T, Atsuta Y, Takemitsu M, et al. A prospective study of de novo scoliosis in a community based cohort[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2006, 31(2): 178-182. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000194777.87055.1b.
[4] Tsubosaka M, Kaneyama S, Yano T, et al. The factors of deterioration in long-term clinical course of lumbar spinal canal stenosis after successful conservative treatment[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2018, 13(1): 239. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-018-0947-2.
[5] Zhang Z, Liu T, Wang Y, et al. Factors related to preoperative coronal malalignment in degenerative lumbar scoliosis: an analysis on coronal parameters[J]. Orthop Surg, 2022, 14(8): 1846-1852. DOI: 10.1111/os.13379.
[6] Steurer J, Roner S, Gnannt R, et al. Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2011, 12: 175. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-175.
[7] Lim YS, Mun JU, Seo MS, et al. Dural sac area is a more sensitive parameter for evaluating lumbar spinal stenosis than spinal canal area: a retrospective study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(49): e9087. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009087.
[8] 马逍悦, 包呼格吉乐图, 蔡志平, 等. 内蒙古包头地区成人第5腰椎平面椎管解剖学与CT测量比较[J]. 包头医学院学报, 2018, 34(11): 84-86. DOI: 10.16833/j.cnki.jbmc.2018.11.038.
[9] Ding H, Liao L, Yan P, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of L4-5 degenerative lumbar disc traction under different pushing heights[J]. J Healthc Eng, 2021, 2021: 1322397. DOI: 10.1155/2021/1322397.
[10]Jenis LG, An HS. Spine update. Lumbar foraminal stenosis[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2000, 25(3): 389-394. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200002010-00022.
[11] Quante M, Richter A, Thomsen B, et al. [Surgical management of adult scoliosis. The challenge of osteoporosis and adjacent level degeneration][J]. Orthopade, 2009, 38(2): 159-169. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-008-1391-5.
[12]Hu W, Song Y, Ma H, et al. Correlation analysis of the characteristics of spino-pelvic parameters and health-related quality of life after long-segment fixation for lenke-silva type 5 or 6 degenerative scoliosis[J]. J Pain Res, 2022, 15: 2171-2179. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S368142.
[13]Cho KJ, Kim YT, Shin SH, et al. Surgical treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis[J]. Asian Spine J, 2014, 8(3): 371-381. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.3.371.
[14] Han F, Weishi L, Zhuoran S, et al. Sagittal plane analysis of the spine and pelvis in degenerative lumbar scoliosis[J]. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2017, 25(1): 612345034. DOI: 10.1177/2309499016684746.
[15]Wang Q, Sun CT. Characteristics and correlation analysis of spino-pelvic sagittal parameters in elderly patients with lumbar degenerative disease[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2019, 14(1): 127. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1156-3.

退行性腰椎侧凸椎管形态学特征及其与脊柱-骨盆参数的相关性分析

Anatomical features of the spinal canal in degenerative lumbar scoliosis and its correlation with spinal-pelvic parameters

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	刘子豪, 刘家明, 颜金祥, 吴嘉宝, 黄山虎, 张志宏, 刘志礼. 下颈椎新型双螺纹椎弓根螺钉设计的解剖学测量[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(2): 121-125.
[2]	陈钧麟, 马向阳, 邹小宝, 付索超, 朱昌荣, 邓琛府, 马仁财, 陈泽星, 夏虹. C_2/3经关节突经椎弓根螺钉固定的影像学测量及可行性分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(2): 126-130.
[3]	郑益钒, 陈嘉楠, 裴璇, 周唯, 方志勋, 程翼鹏, 刘曦明. 髋臼后柱壁安全置钉的数字化解剖研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(2): 131-135.
[4]	杨涛, 高转, 刘炳智, 李武超, 孙睿哲, 郎昱颖, 李京. 尺侧副韧带后束的解剖学特征及临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(2): 136-139.
[5]	卓航, 周泽霖, 邬裕, 龚焱, 宋泽峰, 颜先伟, 沈姿, 卢国樑, 梁德, 江晓兵, 余翔. 基于中老年MRI腰椎椎基静脉孔的影像解剖学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(2): 140-144.
[6]	李佳伟, 张凯, 丁良甲, 王海燕, 陈清威, 刘启, 于小明, 兰文杰, 李筱贺. 内蒙古地区样本髋关节置换假体位置数字化评估[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(2): 145-152.
[7]	方源, 康志杰, 王海燕, 沙丽荣, 李筱贺, 金凤, 齐昕, 王彦超, 张云凤. 未成年人骶骨形态与耻骨联合相对位置三维数字化测量及临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(2): 153-158.
[8]	杨先文, 王飞, 成赋斌, 廖立青. 封闭治疗肩周炎的应用解剖学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(2): 168-173.
[9]	侯晓睿, 李浩坤, 宋贻芳, 常若水, 薛小磊, 张千兵, 吴砂, 王妮莎. 头颈部鳞状细胞癌巨噬细胞关键基因的筛选分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(2): 174-180.
[10]	孙丽, 李欣欣, 李跃, 葛明晓, 欧建平, 葛淑琦. 拮抗剂方案新鲜胚胎移植和冻融胚胎移植临床结局比较[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(2): 181-185.
[11]	张凡, 韦焕杰, 李龙, 欧阳涛, 蔡娟, 梁秋玲, 曾育辉. 连翘苷对感染性休克小鼠急性肺损伤的作用与机制[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(2): 186-190.
[12]	阮磊, 黄博, 王兰兰, 薛惠天, 孙梦龙, 段苗苗, 彭亮. 推拿扌衮法对骨骼肌钝挫伤家兔模型损伤后炎症及纤维化的影响[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(2): 191-195.
[13]	刘瑞平, 钱蕾, 刘燕燕, 万心竹, 陈春艳, 王镱凝, 于宛琪, 欧阳钧. 有跌倒史老年人坐立运动过程中的肌肉协同分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(2): 196-200.
[14]	张云浩, 范凯, 黄从军, 程强强, 王官燕, 肖友平, 梅傲冰. 基于CT数据融合的三维可视化技术及数字虚拟诊疗在肾上腺肿瘤的应用研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(2): 201-207.
[15]	沈江江, 刘志红, 刘宝辉. 神经内镜联合显微镜微血管减压术治疗原发性三叉神经痛的疗效观察#br#[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(2): 208-212.