股骨足印中心定位法单束解剖重建ACL临床效果研究

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2016.06.017

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 685-688.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2016.06.017

股骨足印中心定位法单束解剖重建ACL临床效果研究

徐丛¹，　王永为²，　李嘉¹，　曹向宇¹，　刘文涛¹，　杜元良¹，　戴海峰¹，　刘清晨¹，　吕永明¹

1.承德医学院附属医院关节外科；　2. 承德医学院解剖教研室，河北承德 0670001

收稿日期:2016-06-20 出版日期:2016-11-25 发布日期:2016-12-20
通讯作者: 吕永明，主任医师，Tel:15633142851，E-mail：yong minglv@126.com
作者简介:徐丛（1975-），男，河北唐山人，副主任医师，研究生导师，主要从事关节外科研究工作，Tel: 13613145172，E-mail：arthroscopy2012@163.com
基金资助:
河北省承德市科技支撑计划项目（20122184）；承德医学院附属医院青年基金（201307）

Clinical study of the femur footprint center positioning in the ACL single-bundle anatomical reconstruction

XU Cong¹, WANG Yong-wei²，LI Jia¹, CAO Xiang-yu¹，LIU Wen-tao¹, DU Yuan-liang¹, DAI Hai-feng¹, LIU Qing-chen¹, LV Yong-ming¹

1. Department of Joint Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College, Chengde 067000, China；2. Department of Anatomy, Chengde Medical College, Chengde 067000, China

Received:2016-06-20 Online:2016-11-25 Published:2016-12-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨急性前交叉韧带（anterior cruciate ligament, ACL）断裂后镜下单束解剖重建术中股骨骨道实用定位方法及临床效果。方法　对ACL断裂患者行关节镜下自体半腱股薄肌腱单束解剖重建术，术中股骨侧骨道采用足印中心定位法，同时术中寻找股骨外侧髁间嵴、分叉嵴等骨性标志对定位点准确性进行校对。术前、术后进行膝关节功能检查及评分，包括前抽屉试验、Lachman 试验、pivot shift试验、Lysholm 评分、Tegner 评分、IKDC 评分。结果　(1)镜下100%可见股骨外髁间嵴，但分叉嵴的出现率仅有42%（48/115）。(2)术后前抽屉试验阴性率79%（术后3个月）、77%（术后24月）；Lachman 试验阴性率80%（术后3个月）、71%（术后24月）、pivot shift试验阴性率97%（术后3个月）、95%（术后24月）。(3) Lysholm 评分、Tegner 评分及IKDC 评分与术前比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.01）。结论　ACL单束解剖重建股骨足印区中心点法能提供足够膝关节稳定性，取得满意临床效果，但对股骨止点残留韧带依赖性高；股骨外侧髁间嵴镜下易于辨认，但分叉嵴辨别率低。

关键词: , ACL, 股骨骨道, 半腱股薄肌腱, 解剖重建

Abstract:

Objective　To explore the effective femur tunnel positioning method and primary clinical results in arthroscopic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction after the acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture.　Methods　All patients with ACL rupture were evaluated after arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction by means of the autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons and footprint center positioning method in the femur tunnel. The accuracy of the above-mentioned techniques was intra-operatively evaluated through observing the bone marks of lateral femoral epicondyle， and the drawer test，Lachman test, Pivot-shift test, the Lysholm, Tegner and international knee documentation committee (IKDC) scores were used to estimate knee joint function and stability before and after ACL reconstruction.　Results　(1)the lateral femoral epicondyle was found in all the patients during ACL reconstruction, but the resident ridge was found in only 48 patients. (2)after 3 and 24 months of ACL reconstruction, the negative rate was 79%, 77% for the drawer test, 80%, 71% for the Lachman test and 97%, 95% for the pivot shift test.(3) there were significant differences in Lysholm,Tegner,IKDC scores compared with that prior to ACL reconstruction (P<0.01).　Conclusion　The femur footprint center positioning method in the ACL single-bundle reconstruction provides enough knee joint stability and satisfactory clinical results, but the remnant preservation of ligament in the femur footprint is essential and importantly depended on. While the lateral femoral epicondyle can be easily found, that is not the case for the resident ridge.

Key words: anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), femur tunnel, semitendinosus and gracilis tendons, anatomic reconstruction

徐丛,王永为,李嘉,曹向宇,刘文涛,杜元良,戴海峰,刘清晨,吕永明. 股骨足印中心定位法单束解剖重建ACL临床效果研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2016, 34(6): 685-688.

XU Cong, WANG Yong-wei，LI Jia, CAO Xiang-yu，LIU Wen-tao, DU Yuan-liang, DAI Hai-feng, LIU Qing-chen, LV Yong-ming. Clinical study of the femur footprint center positioning in the ACL single-bundle anatomical reconstruction[J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Anatomy, 2016, 34(6): 685-688.

参考文献

[1] Schillhammer CK, Reid JB 3rd，Rister J，et al. Arthroscopy Up to Date: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Anatomy[J]. Arthroscopy, 2016, 32(1): 209-212.
[2] 陆伟, 王大平, 肖德明. 前交叉韧带重建股骨足迹精确定位的解剖与临床研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2011, 29(5): 513-516.
[3] 陆伟, 王大平, 韩云等, 关节镜下过顶位与解剖位腘绳肌腱单束重建前交叉韧带比较[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2009,27(3): 283-287.
[4] Fu FH, van Eck CF, Tashman S, et al.Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a changing paradigm[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc，2015, 23(3):640-648.
[5] Sasaki S, Tsuda E，Hiraga Y，et al, Prospective randomized study of objective and subjective clinical results between double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2016，44(4): 855-864.
[6] Mayr HO, Benecke P, Hoell A, et al, Single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A comparative 2-year follow-up[J]. Arthroscopy, 2016, 32(1): 34-42.
[7] Tompkins M, Ma R, Hogan MV, et al. What’s new in sports medicine[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2011,93(8):789-797.
[8] Iriuchishima T, Tajima G, Ingham SJ, et al.Impingement pressure in the anatomical and non anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaver study[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2010,38(8):1611-1617.
[9] Rayan F, Nanjayan SK, Quah C, et al. Review of evolution of tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J].World J Orthop, 2015, 6(2):252-262.
[10]Ahn JH, Jeong HJ, Ko CS, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction computed tomography evaluation of tunnel location during single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of transtibial and 2-incision tibial tunnelindependent techniques[J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2013,5(1):26-35.
[11]Nha KW, Han JH, Kwon JH, et al. Anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a freehand transtibial technique[J]. Knee Surg Relat Res, 2015, 27(2):117-122.
[12]Youm YS, Cho SD, Lee SH, et al. Modifid transtibial versus anteromedial portal technique in anatomic singlebundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of femoral tunnel position and clinical results[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2014, 42(12):2941-2947.
[13]Stergiou N, Ristanis S, Moraiti C, et al. Tibial rotation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient and ACL-reconstructed knees: a theoretical proposition for the development of osteoarthritis[J].Sports Med, 2007, 37:601-613.

[1]	江剑宏, 段仁鹏, 李晓锋. 国人胆道三维重建解剖变异应用研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 1-4.
[2]	郭红志, 王瑜, 张加琪, 梁海彬, 马梓玮, 冯伟, 吴忧, 司子燚. 血管铸型结合CT三维模型评估先兆子痫胎盘血管结构[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 5-10.
[3]	李佳伟, 张静, 李灿然, 兰文杰, 籍庆余, 郭志勇, 张云凤, 刘启, 陈清威, 李筱贺. 蒙古族人群股骨近端解剖参数X线测量[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 11-16.
[4]	李琨, 张燕, 郭冉, 郝咪咪, 吴轩宇, 徐艺芳, 王超群, 马文童, 张灵淇, 杨宏宇, 李志军, 张少杰, 王星. 儿童及青少年枕颈角与后枕颈角数字化测量及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 17-20.
[5]	李文, 杨思艺, 黄蕾, 卿霁雯, 蒋松涛, 张磊. 基于MRI探讨Lisfranc韧带的形态学特点及临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 21-25.
[6]	李凡凡, 徐阳, 王晓旭. 紫草素调节Nrf2/HO-1信号通路对实验性大鼠肉芽肿性小叶性乳腺炎的治疗作用研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 26-32.
[7]	王兴航, 丁佳媛, 李放, 包翠芬, 阎丽菁. 人参皂苷Rg1通过抑制NLRP3炎症小体途径减轻氧糖剥夺/复供后小胶质细胞炎症反应[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 33-41.
[8]	程莹莹, 武建军, 蔡海燕, 焦旭文, 马江波, 丁银秀. 体外炎性诱导星形胶质细胞激活及功能分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 42-46.
[9]	祁志, 杨力, 贾秋叶, 陈浩伦, 段兆达, 吴春云. 依达拉奉经MAPKs通路对脂多糖激活的小胶质细胞Sirt3表达调控[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 47-53.
[10]	张晶晶, 王洪新. 黄芩苷通过PDGF/P38 MAPK信号通路对肺动脉高压大鼠的保护作用[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 54-58.
[11]	乐钦, 陈荣丽, 熊婧熙, 王婷怡, 蔡志恒, 易秋实, 曾心怡. 白芨多糖对大鼠跨区皮瓣choke区的影响[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 59-64.
[12]	李笑予, 张磊, 付磊, 李东波, 汪国友. 三步接骨法治疗Sanders Ⅱ型跟骨骨折的有限元研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 65-70.
[13]	吴研飞, 马剑雄, 卢斌, 王颖, 柏豪豪, 靳洪震, 马信龙. CT后处理技术重建CT值与终板抗压强度的相关性研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 71-76.
[14]	庄万强, 唐毅, 骆勇刚, 张辉. 关节镜联合胫骨高位截骨术对髌骨位置及髌股关节功能影响的早中期回顾性研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 77-82.
[15]	罗鹰, 窦伟誉, 吴小杭, 陈璟昆, 彭昌贵, 潘剑英 . 微创海马钢板内固定治疗跟骨骨折并发症的影响因素[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 83-88.

股骨足印中心定位法单束解剖重建ACL临床效果研究

Clinical study of the femur footprint center positioning in the ACL single-bundle anatomical reconstruction

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0