SLA种植体表面喷涂钽形成纳米复合表面预防种植术后早期感染的动物体内实验研究

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2016.02.018

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective　To explore the influence of the occurance and development of experimental peri-implantitis between Sandblasted/Large-grit/Acide -tched (SLA) surface and nanoporous tantalum(Ta)-incorporated Sandblasted/Large-grit/Acide -tched (SLA) surface.　Methods　Two types of implants with different surface modification were implanted in the mandible of 6 Beagle dogs after the extraction of mandibular premolars. After prosthesis-abutment connection, suture line was twined to the neck of abutment in the experimental group, while there’s no suture in the control group. The implants were recorded sequentially from left to right of the distal as 1~6; 3、4 served as the control group while others served as the experimental group. Clinical indicators like plaque index, modified Sulcus Bleeding Index and probing depth were measured for 4 times. Micro-CT scan, surgical recording and pathological changes of peri-implant bone morphology were studied. MANOVA of repeated measuring was used.　Result　There were significant differences (P<0.05) for plaque index, modified Sulcus Bleeding Index and probing depth and surgical measurement between SLA+Ta twined with the suture group and SLA twined with the suture group, the degree of inflammation for SLA+Ta twined with the suture group were inferior to SLA twined with the suture group. Conclusion 　Implants with nanoporous tantalum(Ta)-incorporated Sandblasted/Large-grit/Acide -tched (SLA) surface shows postponed occurrence and development of peri-implantitis than Sandblasted/Large-grit/Acide -tched，(SLA) surface implants and can relieve the degree of inflammation.

Key words: Implant, Surface modification , Peri-implantitis

References

[1] Klinger MM, Rahemtulla F, Prince CW, et al. Proteoglycans at the bone-implant interface [J]. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med, 1998, 9(4):449-463.
[2] 司家文,胡启凡,孙惠强.种植体表面抗菌涂层技术[J]. 口腔颌面修复学杂志, 2011, 12(2): 119-122.
[3] Sakka S, Baroudi K, Nassani MZ. Factors associated with early and late failure of dental implants [J]. J Investig Clin Dent, 2012, 3(4): 258-261.
[4] Schildhauer TA, Robie B, Muhr G, et al. Bacterial adherence to tatalum versus commonly used orthopedic metallic implant materials [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2006, 20(7): 476-484.
[5] Vuong-Hung Pham, Tae-Sik Jang, Hyun-Do Jung. Creation of nanoporous tantalum(Ta)-incorporated titanium(Ti) surface onto Ti implants by sputtering of Ta in Ar under extremely high negative substrate biases[J]. Mater Chem, 2012, 22, 24798.
[6] Park SN, Son DH, Sung SJ. Effects of Ta addition through co-sputtering on the electrical characteristics of indium tin oxide thin film transitors[J]. J Nanosci Nanotechnol, 2015 15(1): 386-390.
[7] Shibli JA, Martins MC, Nociti Junior FH, et al. Treatment of ligature-induced peri-implantitis by lethal photosensitization and guided bone regeneration: a preliminary histologic study in dogs[J]. J Periodontol, 2003,74(3):338-345.
[8] Persson LG, Bergluudh T, Lindhe J, et al. Re-osseointegration after treatment peri-implantitis at different implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dogs.[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2001,12(6):595-603.
[9] Machado MA, Stefani CM, Sallum EA, et al. Treatment of ligature-induced peri-implantitis defect by regenerative procedures: a clinical study in dogs[J]. J Oral Sci, 1999, 41(4):181-185
[10] 邹德荣, 朱红, 瞿晓辉. 种植体周围炎动物模型建立及意义[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2005, 21(4): 463-466.
[11]Donley TG, Gillette WB. Titanium endosseous implant-soft tissue interface: a literature review [J]. J Periodontol, 1991, 62(2): 153-160.
[12]Pendegrass CJ, Goodship AE, Blunn GW. Development of a soft tissue seal around bone-anchored transcutaneous amputation prostheses [J]. Biomaterials, 2006, 27(23): 4183-4191.
[13]Mohandas G, Oskolkov N, McMahon MT. Porous tantalum and tantalum oxide nanoparticles for regenerative medicine [J]. Acta Neurobiol Exp, 2014, 74(2): 188-196.
[14]Reach JS Jr, Dickey ID, Zobitz MZ. Direct Tendon Attachment and Healing to Porous Tantalum: An Experimental Animal Study [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2007, 89(5): 1000-1009.
[15]Scarano A, Piattelli M, Caputi S, et al. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study [J]. J Periodontol, 2004, 75(2): 292-296.
[16]Zhu X, Chen J, Scheideler L, et al. Cellular reactions of osteoblasts to micron- and submicron-scale porous structures of titanium surfaces [J]. Cells Tissues Organs, 2004, 178(1): 13-22.
[17]Gristina AG, Naylor P, Myrvik Q. Infections from biomarerials and implants:a race for the surface [J]. Med Prog Technol, 1988, 14(3-4):205-224.
[18]Alberius P. Bone reactions to tantalum markers. A scanning electron microscopic study [J]. Acta Anat (Basel), 1983, 115(4): 310-318.

The influence of two different types of surface modification with implants in experimental peri-implantitis

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 2

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	Hu Shuohong, Zheng Xuebin, Li Fujie, Wang Hong. Prospective clinical study on the effect of implant abutment materials on the soft and hard tissues around the implant [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2024, 42(1): 94-98.
[2]	HUANG Xing-Xiang, ZHANG Yu, XIANG Mei, XIE Chang. Comparative study of the implant osseointegration rate under two load conditions [J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Anatomy, 2014, 32(6): 694-697.