选择性激光熔融打印钛种植体的制备和表面优化处理及其成骨性能的研究

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2018.03.016

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective　To analyze of the selective laser melting(SLM) printing titanium implant specimens' biocompatibility with surface characterization and in vitro cell experiment, to provide theoretical and experimental basis for what the eventual application of 3D printing implant in clinical therapy.　Methods 60 SLM printing titanium implant wafer specimens underwent sandblasting polishing, 5% hydrofluoric acid pickling and then ultrasonic cleaning, and drying in fluid N2. 20 pieces were randomly selected and allocated into group S; The remaining 40 specimens were treated by anodic oxidation (AO) for 30 min, flushed by deionized water, and underwent heat treatment at 500℃ for 3h. 20 pieces of the remaining 40 were randomly selected and allocated into group SA; 0.1% BMP-2 solution was prepared as the surface modification solution. Afterwards, the remaining 20 specimens treated by ultrasonic shock were soaked in the solution for 10s and then allocated as group SAB; Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and atomic force microscope (AFM) were used to observe the surface topography and roughness of each specimen. Contact angle was adopted for measurement of hydrophilicity; Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) were seeded onto the surface of specimens, and gold was sprayed for observation of the adhesion of BMMSC by SEM; CCK-8 was used to detect the proliferation of the BMMSCs at the surface of each group. 　Results　The SEM pictures showed that the specimens in group SA treated by anodic oxidation had a layer of uniform titania nanotubes on the surface, about 100 nm in diameter. The AFM pictures showed that the surface of group S and group SA had similar roughness values of 300 nm. Contact angle measurement showed the surface of specimens group S and group SA had super hydrophilicity, and specimens in untreated group S also had hydrophilicity. The SEM and CCK-8 kit results showed that the adhesion and proliferation of BMMSCs was better in the group SAB than in group SA and group S.　Conclusions　SLM printing implant specimens in the untreated group and treatment group both have high biocompatibility, and processing methods such as anode oxidation and load with BMP-2 can effectively promote the adhesion and proliferation of BMMSCs.

Key words: 3D printing, 　Titania nanotubes, 　Bone morphogenetic protein

YAN Ling-ling, ZHENG Li-mei, GAO Jie, YANG Cheng-feng, LI Yan-bing, HUANG Wen-hua. Selective laser melting printing of titanium implants and surface optimization for osseointegration[J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Anatomy, 2018, 36(3): 313-318.

References

[1] Chen J, Zhang Z, Chen X, et al. Design and manufacture of customized dental implants by using reverse engineering and selective laser melting technology[J]. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2014, 112(5):1088-1095.
[2] 宿玉成. 口腔种植学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2014:34-35.
[3] Polocorrales L, Latorreesteves M, Ramirezvick J E. Scaffold design for bone regeneration.[J]. Journal of Nanoscience & Nanotechnology, 2014, 14(1):15-56.
[4] Cheng H, Li Y, Huo K, et al. Long lasting in vivo and in vitro antibacterial ability of nanostructured titania coating incorporated with silver nanoparticles[J]. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2014, 102(10):3488-3499.
[5] Park J, Bauer S, Mark K V D, et al. Nanosize and vitality: TiO2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate.[J]. Nano Letters, 2007, 7(6):1686-1691.
[6] Otawa N, Sumida T, Kitagaki H, et al. Custom-made titanium devices as membranes for bone augmentation in implant treatment: Modeling accuracy of titanium products constructed with selective laser melting[J]. Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 2015, 43(7):1289-1295.
[7] Gong D, Grimes CA, Varghese OK, et al. Titanium oxide nanotube arrays prepared by anodic oxidation[J]. Journal of Materials Research, 2011,16(12):3331-3334.
[8] Oh SH, Finõnes RR, Daraio C, et al. Growth of nano-scale hydroxyapatite using chemically treated titanium oxide nanotubes.[J]. Biomaterials, 2005,26(24):4938-4943.
[9] Oh S, Brammer KS, Li YSJ, et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009, 106(7):2130-2135.
[10] Zhao L, Liu L, Wu Z, et al. Effects of micropitted/nanotubular titania topographies on bone mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic differentiation[J]. Biomaterials, 2012,33(9):2629-2641.
[11] Eriberto B, Luca S, Riccardo G, et al. Nanostructured Surfaces of Dental Implants[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2013,14(1):1918-1931.
[12] Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Wieland M, et al. High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure[J]. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2005,74A(1):49-58.
[13] Young-Taeg S. Electrochemical growth behavior, surface properties, and enhancedin vivobone response of TiO2 nanotubes on microstructured surfaces of blasted, screw-shaped titanium implants[J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2010, 5(1):87-100.
[14] Rupp F, Scheideler L, Rehbein D, et al. Roughness induced dynamic changes of wettability of acid etched titanium implant modifications[J]. Biomaterials, 2004,25(7-8):1429-1438.
[15] Schwarz F, Ferrari D, Herten M, et al. Effects of surface hydrophilicity and microtopography on early stages of soft and hard tissue integration at non-submerged titanium implants: an immunohistochemical study in dogs.[J]. Journal of Periodontology, 2007,78(11):2171-2184.
[16] Lavery K, Swain P, Falb D, et al. BMP-2/4 and BMP-6/7 Differentially Utilize Cell Surface Receptors to Induce Osteoblastic Differentiation of Human Bone Marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2008,283(30):20948-20958.

Selective laser melting printing of titanium implants and surface optimization for osseointegration

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	Zhang Lei, Wang Rui-han, Tang Zi-hui, Yi Gang, Zhou Xin. Application of digital optimization design in coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for precise positioning of the bone tunnel [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(4): 385-389.
[2]	Wang Jianhua, Wu Di, Sun He, Zhang Yilong, Xin Lili, Li Le. Follow-up of the clinical efficacy and sagittal balance of 3D printing spine intervertebral fusion cage in treatment of cervical spondylosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(3): 342-348.
[3]	Li Jun, Liang Shuai, Wang Jian. Application of simulated surgery combined with 3D printing patient-specific instrumentation in high tibial osteotomy [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(3): 354-359.
[4]	Guo Liping, Ju Jihui, Zhou Rong, Wang Jian, Yu Xinshui. 3D printing the affected hand model to guide the individualized selection of flap in the treatment of contracture of the first web space [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(2): 221-224.
[5]	Zhang Xiangnan, Deng Wei, Zhang Songqiang, Wang Hongyu, Li Lei, Ju Wen, Zhou Guangliang, Ju Faxin, Zhou Zhenghu, Li Guanxing, Ju Jihui, Hou Ruixing. Fabrication of cast specimen of internal femoral head artery by microperfusion combined with 3D printing [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(1): 103-106.
[6]	Su Weiwei, He Zaopeng, Zhang Guodong, Li Wei, Xu Jing, Liao Zhengwen, Xie Pusheng, Lin Dongxin, Huang Wenhua. Accurate localization and removal of deeply imbedded metallic foreign bodies in human limbs assisted by positioning device [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2021, 39(2): 148-153.
[7]	ZHANG Yong , ZHANG Yan-ru , YANG Yun-feng , LU Yan , TONG Zhao-hui. Study on the accuracy of three dimensional reconstruction and three dimensional printing technique in the measurement of pelvic three dimensional features [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2020, 38(6): 697-702.
[8]	NIU Ming, MA Ju-rong, WU Xu-nian, WANG Tong, CAI Jing-wei, WANG Xu-bo . Clinical application of TKA surgery assisted by 3D printing osteotomy guide plate in Hexi Corridor [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2019, 37(6): 697-704.
[9]	LI Wen-rui, DU Bing-ran, LI Jian-yi, FAN Tian-cheng, LI Lu-tao. The design and drilling accuracy evaluation of personalized guide device in coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2019, 37(5): 494-497.
[10]	ZHAO Jing-xin, MA Ya-chang, ZHU Ya-wen, YANG Zhao-xin, QIU Yu-chen, MIAO Wei, WANG Yu, JIN Yu. Clinical efficacy analysis of 3D printing as assisted therapy for youth Salter-HarrisⅡ distal fracture of radius [J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Anatomy, 2018, 36(3): 346-348.
[11]	GUO Wen-bin, GUO Xiao-bin, ZHANG Wan-song, YANG Cheng, BIAN Jun, YANG Jian-kun, LIU Cun-dong. Personalized surgical treatment of kidney stones based on colour 3D printing technology [J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Anatomy, 2018, 36(3): 329-332.
[12]	GAO Jun-huai, QIU Su-jun, YIN Jie, SHI Ben-chao, MIN Shao-xiong. Osteogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells induced by bone morphogenetic protein gene 2 vector [J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Anatomy, 2018, 36(2): 187-191.
[13]	YAN Bin, SUN Yong-jan, OUYANG Han-bin, YANG Yang, WU Yi, LING Qin-jie, HUANG Hua-jun, HUANG Wen-hua. Clinical application of accurate lumbar pedicle screws placement assisted by 3D printing navigation modules [J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Anatomy, 2017, 35(2): 156-159.
[14]	. The feasibility study of cervical pedicle screwed with new individual-oriented template by 3D printing technology [J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Anatomy, 2017, 35(2): 147-150.
[15]	SONG Ying1,2, TANG Lei1, WU Bu-ling2, LI Jian-yi1, WANG Wen-hao3, XU Chu1,2, BAI Yu-zhe4, YI Si1,XU Di-wei1. Generation of a 3D printed tooth model and evaluation of the anatomic fidelity [J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Anatomy, 2016, 34(3): 298-302.