Anatomical morphometry of the coracoid process and its clinical significance
Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6) : 606-610.
Anatomical morphometry of the coracoid process and its clinical significance
Objective To measure the anatomical morphology and spatial relative position of the coracoid process, and to provide anatomical basis for diagnoses and treatments of shoulder joints diseases. Methods A total of 165 dry and intact scapulae of Chinese population were collected(61 left and 104 right). Morphological parameters of important structures of the coracoid process were measured: three widths, three thicknesses, three lengths, four distances and three angles. Measurement results underwent statistical analysis. Results The width and thickness of the coracoid tip was (13.40±3.09~14.42±2.84) mm and (8.41±1.51~9.07±1.63) mm, respectively. The length from coracoid tip to precipice and from coracoid precipice to base (38.77± 4.54~40.77±4.55) mm and (20.03±2.04~19.18±2.40) mm, respectively; The distance from coracoid tip to suprascapular notch (45.20±4.21~47.03±4.00) mm on the left and right sides was significantly different (P<0.05), while the remaining anatomical morphology and spatial relative position of the coracoid process had no significant difference (P>0.05). Conclusions The comprehensive measurement of anatomical morphology and spatial relative position of the coracoid process can provide an anatomical basis for diagnosis and treatment of the shoulder joints diseases, improving the safety and reducing the risk of surgery involving the shoulder joint diseases.
Coracoid process; / Scapula; / Anatomy; / Spatial relative position; / Shoulder joint; / Diagnoses and treatments
[1] Mohammed H, Skalski MR, Patel DB, et al. CoracoidpProcess: the lighthouse of the shoulder[J]. Radiographics, 2016, 36(7): 2084-2101.
[2] 连建强, 董乐乐, 魏海涛, 等. 国人喙突的解剖特点及在Latarjet术的应用[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2015,3(4): 40-44.
[3] Lian J, Dong L, Zhao Y, et al. Anatomical study of the coracoid process in Mongolian male cadavers using the Latarjet procedure[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2016, 11(1): 126-134.
[4] Eyres KS, Brooks A, Stanley D. Fractures of the coracoid process[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1995, 77(3): 425-428.
[5] Coale RM, Hollister SJ, Dines JS, et al. Anatomic considerations of transclavicular-transcoracoid drilling for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2013, 22(1): 137-144.
[6] 陶振宇, 蔡乐益, 余贤斌, 等, 孙辽军.喙突钢板位置对应用Triple Endobutton技术治疗肩锁关节脱位疗效的影响[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2018, 6(1): 30-37.
[7] 刘刚, 张磊, 张宝露, 等. 新型双Endobutton袢钢板联合关节镜治疗锁骨远端Neer IIB型骨折的临床分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2017, 35(4): 431-436.
[8] Lu D, Wang T, Chen H, et al. A comparison of double Endobutton and triple Endobutton techniques for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2016, 102(7): 891-895.
[9] Wilson JL, Brown DL, Wong GY, et al. Infraclavicular brachial plexus block: parasagittal anatomy important to the coracoid technique[J]. Anesth Analg, 1998, 87(4): 870-873.
[10] Athwal GS, Meislin R, Getz C, et al. Short-term complications of the arthroscopic latarjet procedure: a north american experience[J]. Arthroscopy, 2016, 32(10): 1965-1970.
[11] 朱以明, 姜春岩. 评估Latarjet手术后移位喙突骨块吸收情况的CT分型系统的一致性研[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2015, 3(1): 35-42.
[12]Loriaut P, Casabianca L, Alkhaili J, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocations using a double button device: Clinical and MRI results[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2015, 101(8): 895-901.
[13] Abhinaya RJ, Venkatraman R, Matheswaran P, et al. A randomised comparative evaluation of supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches to brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries using both ultrasound and nerve stimulator[J]. Indian J Anaesth, 2017,61: 581-586.
[14] 向明, 杨国勇, 陈杭, 等. Latarjet两种术式治疗肩关节复发性前脱位伴重度骨缺损3~5年随访的 比较研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2014(1): 30-36.
[15] 潘昭勋, 杜德凯, 张洪鑫, 等. 三种Endobutton术式重建喙锁韧带术后稳定性的生物力学对比研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2017, 35(1): 74-77.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
