肾型n-HA/PA66腰椎间融合器在经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术中的有限元分析

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2014.01.016

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective　To design a new “Kidney” like n-HA/PA66 lumbar fusion cage and analyze the biomechanics of this cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using the method of finite element analysis.　Methods　Develop a normal intact three validated model of L3-L5 lumbar segments, compare the biomechanical difference between new kidney-liked cage and usual bullet-liked cage by simulating the TLIF using finite element analysis.　Results　Compare different TLIF model with the two kinds of cage, the max stress of old cage and new cage was 32.8、32.8、31.4、31.3、32.8、34.2MPa and 13.2、11.4、10.9、10.1、11.7、11.1MPa, separately. And the new cage’s area of stress concentration was smaller than the old cage’s. Conclusion　This brand new cage has good biomechanical stability and reduced stress of the cage-endplate interface. This may reduce the sedimentation rate of cage.

Key words: n-HA/PA66 lumbar fusion cage, Finite element analysis, Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)

CLC Number:

R687.3

WANG Xiao-Feng, OU Yun-Sheng, JIANG Dian-Meng, LI Kai-Ting, YANG Bo, LIU Bo, AN Hong. A kidney-liked n-HA/PA66 cage In transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2014, 32(1): 67-71.

References

[1] 吴兰，李玉宝，杨维虎，等. n-HA/PA66复合材料与人皮质骨的定性和定量对比研究
[J]. 功能材料, 2005,36(6):892-895.

[2] 刘显宏，欧云生，蒋电明，等. n-HA/PA66与PEEK cage在颈前路椎间盘切除减压术后椎间隙重建的比较研究
[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2012,30(6):687-692.

[3] 欧云生，蒋电明，权正学，等. 纳米羟基磷灰石／聚酰胺66复合生物活性人工椎体在胸腰椎骨折前路重建手术中的应用
[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2007,21(10):1084-1089.

[4] 欧云生，蒋电明，权正学，等. n-HA/PA66复合生物活性融合器在颈椎病前路减压融合术中的初步应用研究
[J]. 生物医学工程学杂志, 2010,27(2):324-327.

[5] Zhao Z, Jiang D, Ou Y, et al. A hollow cylindrical nano-hydroxyapatite/polymide composite strut for cervical reconstruction after cervical corpectomy
[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2012,19(4):536-540.

[6] Schmidt H, Heuer F, Simon U, et al. Application of a new calibration method for a three-dimensional finite element model of a human lumbar annulus fibrosus
[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2006,21(4): 337-344.

[7] Goel VK, Monroe BT, Gilbertson LG, et al. Interlaminar shear stresses and laminae separation in a disc. Finite element analysis of the L3-L4 motion segment subjected to axial compressive loads
[J]. Spine, 1995,20(6): 689-698.

[8] Salehi SA, Tawk R, Ganju A, et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: surgical technique and results in 24 patients
[J]. Neurosurgery, 2004, 54(2):368-374.

[9] Hackenberg L, Halm H, Bullmann V, et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results
[J].Eur Spine J, 2005,14(6):551-558.

[10]Shim CS, Park SW, Lee SH, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous stabilizing device, Locker
[J]. Spine, 2008, 33(22): E820-827.

[11]刘曼，孟耀，周立伟，等. 纳米羟基磷灰石/聚酰胺66复合膜的结构及成骨样细胞相容性研究
[J]. 现代口腔医学杂志, 2012, 26(1):3-7.

[12]欧云生，蒋电明，权正学，等. n-HA/PA66复合生物活性人工椎体支撑植骨治疗胸腰椎爆裂型骨折合并截瘫
[J]. 中国临床医学, 2007,14(3):413-415.

[13]Yang X, Song Y, Liu L, et al. Anterior Reconstruction With Nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide- 66 Cage After Thoracic and Lumbar Corpectomy
[J]. Orthopedics, 2012, 35(1):e66-73.

[14]Fukuta S, Miyamoto K, Hosoe H, et al. Kidney-type intervertebral spacers should be located anteriorly in cantilever transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analyses of risk factors for spacer subsidence for a minimum of 2 years
[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2011, 24(3):189-195.

[15]Le TV, Baaj AA, Dakwar E, et al. Subsidence of polyetheretherketone intervertebral cages in minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion
[J]. Spine, 2012, 37(14):1268-1273.

[16]Evans JH. Biomechanics of lumbar fusion
[J]. Clin Orthop,1985, (193):38-46.

A kidney-liked n-HA/PA66 cage In transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	Li Xiaoyu , Zhang Lei , Fu Lei , Li Dongbo , Wang Guoyou. Finite element study on the treatment of Sanders type II calcaneal fracture with three-step reduction method [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2024, 42(1): 65-70.
[2]	Zhang Yue, Cai Xingbo, Zhang Bihuan, Wang Bin, Xu Yongqing. A review of biomechanical studies of wrist after total wrist arthroplasty [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2024, 42(1): 112-114.
[3]	Hong Liting , Meng Qingguo, Wu Jianhui, Xu Lingyan, Gao Runze, Zhai Lidong. Finite element analysis of different forms of intravesical prostatic protrusion [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(4): 459-464.
[4]	Lin Wenjie, Sun Xin, Huang Wenhua, Wei Bo, Lin Tao, Liang Zhenming, Zhong Huan, Zhang Xin, Ouyang Hanbin. Biomechanical analysis of hindfoot joint after ankle arthrodesis [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(2): 212-217.
[5]	Cai Hao, Zhou Haibo, Yu Jiahuan, Hu Kai, Meng Hongming, Shou Zeyu, Chen Chun, Bai Zhibiao. Finite element analysis and comparison of the models of patellar transverse fracture fixed with hollow screw combined with “8” and “0” tension band wire internal fixation [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(4): 454-459.
[6]	Tong Ling, Xu Yangyang, Wang Yidan, Ma Yuan, Wang Haiyan, Li Xiaohe. Finite element analysis of anterior cervical micro-memory compression alloy plate [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(3): 320-326.
[7]	Wei Mingjie, Xu Yujian, Wu Yipeng, Wang Teng, Wu Huan, Yuan Libo, Tang Wenbao, Guo Xiaojv, Xu Yongqing. Stress distribution of the scapholunate interosseous ligament under different load conditions on the wrist [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2021, 39(5): 586-592.
[8]	Wu Xiaowei, Li Jianyi, Du Bingran, Yang Qiaohua, Fan Tiancheng, Li Lutao. Finite element model construction and analysis of mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2021, 39(4): 443-448.
[9]	ZHANG Xu-lin, XU Yong-qing, HE Xiao-qing, MAO Yu-chi, YANG Ling-jian, YUAN Li-bo. Finite element analysis of three internal fixation methods for scaphoid waist fracture [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2019, 37(5): 553-558.
[10]	KANG Yong-qiang, RUI Yong-jun. Finite element analysis of the stress distribution in articular surface during flexion and extension of 2~5 metacarpophalangeal joint [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2019, 37(3): 299-303.
[11]	ZHANG Bao-cheng, CAI Xian-hua, LIU Hai-bo, WANG Zhi-hua, XU Feng, KANG Hui, DING Ran . Biomechanical comparison of two modified Goel techniques for the treatment of basilar invagination by finite element analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2019, 37(3): 304-310.
[12]	WU Geng, ZHANG Zhen-wei, ZHANG Mei-chao, LI Zheng. Finite element analysis of the effect of increasing screw cap on internal fixation of tibial fracture in fracture area of steel plate [J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Anatomy, 2019, 37(2): 185-189.
[13]	LING Qin-jie, LIN Hu, XIE Pu-sheng, DENG Yu-ping, HUANG Wen-hua. Development and validation of nonlinear finite element model of the whole lumbar spine [J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Anatomy, 2018, 36(6): 662-667.
[14]	QIU Wei-hua，LI Jian-yi，LIN Li-jun. Finite element analysis of the effect of acetabular cup horizontal displacement on the stress distribution in cementless femoral prosthesis-bone interface in total hip arthroplasty [J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Anatomy, 2018, 36(5): 557-564.
[15]	ZHENG Xiang, XU Jin-huang, HUANG jian-rong. Finite element analysis of two nonanatomic reductions of Pauwels Ⅲ subcapital femoral fractures fixation [J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Anatomy, 2017, 35(6): 665-670.