喙突的解剖形态学测量及其临床意义

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2018.06.002

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective　To measure the anatomical morphology and spatial relative position of the coracoid process, and to provide anatomical basis for diagnoses and treatments of shoulder joints diseases. Methods　A total of 165 dry and intact scapulae of Chinese population were collected(61 left and 104 right). Morphological parameters of important structures of the coracoid process were measured: three widths, three thicknesses, three lengths, four distances and three angles. Measurement results underwent statistical analysis. Results　The width and thickness of the coracoid tip was (13.40±3.09~14.42±2.84) mm and (8.41±1.51~9.07±1.63) mm, respectively. The length from coracoid tip to precipice and from coracoid precipice to base (38.77± 4.54~40.77±4.55) mm and (20.03±2.04~19.18±2.40) mm, respectively; The distance from coracoid tip to suprascapular notch (45.20±4.21~47.03±4.00) mm on the left and right sides was significantly different (P<0.05), while the remaining anatomical morphology and spatial relative position of the coracoid process had no significant difference (P>0.05). Conclusions　The comprehensive measurement of anatomical morphology and spatial relative position of the coracoid process can provide an anatomical basis for diagnosis and treatment of the shoulder joints diseases, improving the safety and reducing the risk of surgery involving the shoulder joint diseases.

Key words: Coracoid process; , Scapula; , Anatomy; , Spatial relative position; , Shoulder joint; , Diagnoses and treatments

References

[1] Mohammed H, Skalski MR, Patel DB, et al. CoracoidpProcess: the lighthouse of the shoulder[J]. Radiographics, 2016, 36(7): 2084-2101.
[2] 连建强, 董乐乐, 魏海涛, 等. 国人喙突的解剖特点及在Latarjet术的应用[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2015,3(4): 40-44.
[3] Lian J, Dong L, Zhao Y, et al. Anatomical study of the coracoid process in Mongolian male cadavers using the Latarjet procedure[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2016, 11(1): 126-134.
[4] Eyres KS, Brooks A, Stanley D. Fractures of the coracoid process[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1995, 77(3): 425-428.
[5] Coale RM, Hollister SJ, Dines JS, et al. Anatomic considerations of transclavicular-transcoracoid drilling for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2013, 22(1): 137-144.
[6] 陶振宇, 蔡乐益, 余贤斌, 等, 孙辽军.喙突钢板位置对应用Triple Endobutton技术治疗肩锁关节脱位疗效的影响[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2018, 6(1): 30-37.
[7] 刘刚, 张磊, 张宝露, 等. 新型双Endobutton袢钢板联合关节镜治疗锁骨远端Neer IIB型骨折的临床分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2017, 35(4): 431-436.
[8] Lu D, Wang T, Chen H, et al. A comparison of double Endobutton and triple Endobutton techniques for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2016, 102(7): 891-895.
[9] Wilson JL, Brown DL, Wong GY, et al. Infraclavicular brachial plexus block: parasagittal anatomy important to the coracoid technique[J]. Anesth Analg, 1998, 87(4): 870-873.
[10] Athwal GS, Meislin R, Getz C, et al. Short-term complications of the arthroscopic latarjet procedure: a north american experience[J]. Arthroscopy, 2016, 32(10): 1965-1970.
[11] 朱以明, 姜春岩. 评估Latarjet手术后移位喙突骨块吸收情况的CT分型系统的一致性研[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2015, 3(1): 35-42.
[12]Loriaut P, Casabianca L, Alkhaili J, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocations using a double button device: Clinical and MRI results[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2015, 101(8): 895-901.
[13] Abhinaya RJ, Venkatraman R, Matheswaran P, et al. A randomised comparative evaluation of supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches to brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries using both ultrasound and nerve stimulator[J]. Indian J Anaesth, 2017,61: 581-586.
[14] 向明, 杨国勇, 陈杭, 等. Latarjet两种术式治疗肩关节复发性前脱位伴重度骨缺损3~5年随访的比较研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2014(1): 30-36.
[15] 潘昭勋, 杜德凯, 张洪鑫, 等. 三种Endobutton术式重建喙锁韧带术后稳定性的生物力学对比研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2017, 35(1): 74-77.

Anatomical morphometry of the coracoid process and its clinical significance

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	Chen Ren, Yang Shengbo. Research progress on the anatomy and clinical application of masseter muscle [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2024, 42(1): 115-117.
[2]	Chen Zhuhong, Li Yanbing, Huang Huajun, Lin Xijiang, Zeng Canjun. Anatomical study of posterior pelvic ring injury combined with contralateral anterior pelvic ring injury treated with modified pararectus abdominis incision [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(6): 633-639.
[3]	Song Hao, Yang Mengyuan, Lu Yiwen, Zhang Xudong, Chen Ruixue. CBCT study on the anatomical factors related to anterior dental implants [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(4): 401-408.
[4]	Ding Ran, Zheng Xuefeng, Ding Zihai, Wu Tao. Clinical anatomy study of cholecystic vein and distribution of its branches [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(3): 249-253.
[5]	Wu Shiyuan, He Haoqiang, Chen Zhenghe, Mou Yonggao, Li Yanbing, Huang Wenhua, Zhong Shizhen. Three-dimensional reconstruction of superior petrosal vein by multi-modal fusion technology [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(3): 270-276.
[6]	Li Mingzhe, Wang Tao, Cong Peijie, Wang Chengtao, Liu Xiaoliu. The specimen preparation for a modular brain complex [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(3): 365-366.
[7]	Zhao Zhiheng, Wu Yue, Zhang Jing, Yang Zitao, Zhang Qinyong, Wang Qingwei, Cheng Jingliang , Che Yingyu. Comparative study of anatomical structure and functional characteristics of pelvic floor in normal young men and women by static and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(2): 143-149.
[8]	Zhou Chunhui, Lv Wenying, Dong Chao, Zhang Jianning, Sun Junzhao. Application of multimodal electromagnetic navigation in endoscopic endonasal approach of fresh cadavers [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(2): 156-161.
[9]	Pan Baoshun, Chen Jinshui, Fang Zhen, Gao Mingjie . Anatomical study and clinical significance of posterior atlantoaxial structure [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(6): 633-638.
[10]	Li Ziyu, Li Kun, Guo Yan, Yue Sa, Qu Xingyue, Liu Yuhang, Zhang Fengzhen, Wang Xing, Xu Yifa, Li Zhijun, Li Xiaohe, Zhang Shaojie. Research on the visualization model of skull base and neck in digital children [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(6): 639-643.
[11]	Ma Kun, Li Pingsong, Hou Tuanjie, Chen Xiao, Ma Le, Rong Kunjie, Chen Jiaxiang . Applied anatomical study of eyebrow fat pad based on the mechanism of upper eyelid skin ptosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(6): 649-654.
[12]	Chen Shuai, Yi Chenpeng, Wang Jie, Gong Dawei, Jiao Feng, Huang Huayang, Zheng Xiaofei, Wang Haibin. Anatomical study and clinical significance on tibial collateral ligament of the knee and medial meniscus [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(5): 519-522.
[13]	Peng Peng, Huang Gang, Zhu Meisong, Li Jianyi. Anatomical study of anterior pedicle cortical bone screw in lower cervical spine [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(5): 505-510.
[14]	Li Yubiao, Ren Anli, Ding Ning, Zhao Zhe, Dong Xiaohan, Li Zhimin, Dong Peng. CT anatomic study of normal left posterior pararenal space [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(4): 414-417.
[15]	Qi Ji, Li Jing, Wang Haizhou, Chen Ping, Lin Dingkun, Chen Haiyun, Ping Ruiyue, Xu Yanxiao, Li Yikai. Anatomical classification of posterior superior iliac spine and its clinical significance [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(4): 377-382.