INFIX置钉入路的改良研究及其在骨盆骨折治疗中的应用

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2019.01.003

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective　To explore the feasibility of INFIX nailing into the space between sartorius and iliopsoas muscle, and to evaluate its clinical efficacy and complications.　Methods 　The distance from the medial and lateral margins of sartorius to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve and femoral nerve were measured on gross specimens, and the differences among groups were compared with t-test. Then, the clinical data of 14 pelvic fracture patients treated with INFIX were collected from Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University from August 2016 to December 2018. Evaluation of clinical efficacy depended on the pelvic deformity index (PDI) and the width of pubic symphysis, as well as the weighting time, the time to remove internal fixation and the Majeed score after INFIX. Complications included the injury to lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN), the injury to femoral nerve, and so on.　Results　Compared to the lateral margin of sartorius, the distance from medial margin to LFCN increased 7.71 mm (P<0.01), and to the femoral nerve still remained 22.36 mm. After INFIX, the PDI decreased 1.82%(P<0.01), the width of pubic symphysis decreased 6.98 mm (P<0.05), the average weighting time was 12.70 week, the time to remove internal fixation was 29.50 week, and the Majeed score was 90.80. There was no injury of LFCN and the femoral nerve, 2 patients had incisional infection, and 1 patient had subjective discomfort. Conclusion The INFIX nailing into the space between sartorius and iliopsoas muscle can reduce the risk of injury to LFCN, and does not interfere with the femoral nerve. It has several advantages for anterior pelvic ring fracture including minimal invasion, good curative effect, and few complications.

Key words: Approach, 　Sartorius, 　LFCN, 　Pelvic fracture

ZHOU Chun-kui1， ZENG Fei1， HUANG Hua-jian， LAI Zhong-ming， LI Ze-yu, LI Song-jian1ZHOU Chun-kui， ZENG Fei， HUANG Hua-jian， LAI Zhong-ming， LI Ze-yu, LI Song-jian. A modified nailing approach of INFIX and its application in the treatment of pelvic fracture[J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Anatomy, 2019, 37(1): 9-13.

References

[1] Mason W T M, Khan S N, James C L, et al. Complications of temporary and definitive external fixation of pelvic ring injuries[J]. Injury, 2005, 36(5):599-604.
[2] Vaidya R, Martin A J, Roth M, et al. INFIX versus plating for pelvic fractures with disruption of the symphysis pubis[J]. Int Orthop, 2017, 41(8):1671-1678.
[3] Kuttner M, Klaiber A, Lorenz T, et al. The pelvic subcutaneous cross-over internal fixator[J]. Unfallchirurg, 2009, 112(7):661-669.
[4] Vaidya R, Colen R, Vigdorchik J, et al. Treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries with an internal anterior fixator and posterior fixation: initial clinical series[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2012, 26(1):1-8.
[5] Fang C, Alabdulrahman H, Pape H C. Complications after percutaneous internal fixator for anterior pelvic ring injuries[J]. Int Orthop, 2017, 41(9):1785-1790.
[6] Dahill M, Mcarthur J, Roberts G L, et al. The use of an anterior pelvic internal fixator to treat disruptions of the anterior pelvic ring: a report of technique, indications and complications[J]. Bone Joint J, 2017, 99-B(9):1232-1236.
[7] Young J W, Burgess A R, Brumback R J, et al. Pelvic fractures: value of plain radiography in early assessment and management[J]. Radiology, 1986, 160(2):445-451.
[8] Majeed S A. Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1989, 71(2):304-306.
[9] Berry J L, Stahurski T, Asher MA. Morphometry of the supra sciatic notch intrailiac implant anchor passage[J]. Spine, 2001, 26(7):143-148.
[10] 盛伟超, 高延征, 钟世镇. 髂骨螺钉骨性通道毗连血管及神经的解剖学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2018, 36(3): 248-251.
[11] Haidukewych G J, Kumar S, Prpa B. Placement of half-pins for supra-acetabular external fixation: an anatomic study[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2003, (411): 269-273.
[12]Gardner M J, Nork S E. Stabilization of unstable pelvic fractures with supraacetabular compression external fixation[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2007, 21(4): 269-273.
[13]谭山, 高仕长, 张安维, 等. 髋臼上区域置钉安全范围的影像学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2018, 36(3):259-263.
[14]Poelstra K A, Kahler D M. Supra-acetabular placement of external fixator pins: a safe and expedient method of providing the injured pelvis with stability[J]. Am J Orthop, 2005, 34(3):148-151.
[15]Kim W Y, Hearn T C, Seleem O, et al. Effect of pin location on stability of pelvic external fixation[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1999, (361): 237-244.
[16]Vaidya R, Martin A J, Roth M, et al. Midterm radiographic and functional outcomes of the anterior subcutaneous internal pelvic fixator (INFIX) for pelvic ring injuries[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2017, 31(5): 252-259.
[17] Reichel L M, Maccormick L M, Dugarte A J, et al. Minimally invasive anterior pelvic internal fixation: An anatomic study comparing Pelvic Bridge to INFIX[J]. Injury, 2018, 49(2):309-314.
[18]Osterhoff G, Aichner EV, Scherer J, et al. Anterior subcutaneous internal fixation of the pelvis - what rod-to-bone distance is anatomically optimal[J]? Injury, 2017, 48(10):2162-2168.
[19] Vigdorchik J M, Esquivel A O, Jin X, et al. Biomechanical stability of a supra-acetabular pedicle screw internal fixation device (INFIX) vs external fixation and plates for vertically unstable pelvic fractures[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2012, 7:31-35.
[20]李尚政, 苏伟, 赵劲民, 等. 钉-棒系统与外固定支架固定骨盆不稳定损伤模型的生物力学比较[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2013, 15(6): 517-520.
[21]李尚政, 苏伟, 庄小强, 等. 钢板与钉棒系统固定骨盆Tile B1型损伤模型的生物力学比较[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2014, 16(2): 161-164.
[22] Eagan M, Kim H, Manson T T, et al. Internal anterior fixators for pelvic ring injuries: Do monaxial pedicle screws provide more stiffness than polyaxial pedicle screws[J]? Injury, 2015, 46(6):996-1000.

A modified nailing approach of INFIX and its application in the treatment of pelvic fracture

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	Chen Zhuhong, Li Yanbing, Huang Huajun, Lin Xijiang, Zeng Canjun. Anatomical study of posterior pelvic ring injury combined with contralateral anterior pelvic ring injury treated with modified pararectus abdominis incision [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(6): 633-639.
[2]	Ye Shuxi, Yang Xiaodong, Li Tao, Mai Qiguang, Wang Hua, Fan Shicai . Application and clinical effect analysis of lateral anterior rectus approach in the treatment of acetabular fractures in pediatric [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(6): 728-732.
[3]	Yi Honglei, Chen Hu, Wang Xinhui, Zhu Changrong, Lian Peirong, Xia Hong. MRI anatomical differences of retroperitoneal blood vessels and psoas muscle in different body positions [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(5): 511-515.
[4]	Yang Hua, Xiang Lei, Jiang Hongbing, Hu Bingbing, Zeng Canjun, Zhang Bin, Liu Wei. Comparison of clinical efficacy of modified Stoppa approach and modified pararecutus abdominis approach in the treatment of acetabulum fractures [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(5): 603-607.
[5]	Li Junran, Liang Junsheng, Li Dongmei, Zhai Jingxiu, Xu Ying, Wang Hongrun, Deng Fukuan, Li Ligeng. Application of customized traction table in hemiarthroplasty through the direct anterior approach [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(3): 349-353.
[6]	Zhou Chunhui, Lv Wenying, Dong Chao, Zhang Jianning, Sun Junzhao. Application of multimodal electromagnetic navigation in endoscopic endonasal approach of fresh cadavers [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(2): 156-161.
[7]	. The surgical treatment strategy for adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of multi-segments [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(2): 218-223.
[8]	Huang Yangliang, Zhong Yi, Liu Shaoyu . Clinical efficacy and anatomical basis of encircle method for resection of thoracic ossification of ligamentum flavum [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(1): 87-91.
[9]	Jian Wei, Xu Cong, Ai Wen, Yin Shengjiang, Bi Zhenyu, Wu Zebin. Application of three-dimensional CT imaging technology in the determination of the "V" point in posterior cervical approach percutaneous spinal endoscopic surgery [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(6): 720-724.
[10]	Chen Zhengjun, Nie Yu, Wei Yi, Zhou Fang, Ren Shangqing, Fan Shida, Lv Qian, Tian Jingzhi, Wang Dong. Modified single incision and multi-channel extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (additional report of 120 cases) [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(6): 743-747.
[11]	Xiao Le, Jiang Zongxing, Luo Hao, Wang Tao, Tan Zhen, Wang Tao. Comparison of clinical efficacy of cystic plate approach and traditional approach in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstone patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(4): 480-484.
[12]	Wu Pinghua, Mo Ligen, Chen Hainan, Guo Fangzhou, Mu Junbo. Anatomical study of endoscopic trans-supraorbital keyhole approach [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(3): 255-258.
[13]	Jiang Guanyin, Ou Yunsheng, Zhu Yong, Luo Wei, Du Xing, Zhang Wei, Qin Wanyuan. Study on the curative effects of granular bone graft, titanium mesh bone graft and iliac bone graft in single-segment lumbar tuberculosis focus debridement by posterior approach [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(2): 204-210.
[14]	Shan Jianlin, Zhang Zhicheng, Cheng Mengmeng, Chen Hao, Jia Pu, Bao Li, Feng Fei, Tang Hai. Anatomical basis of Wiltse approach in lumbar operation entering the interspace between multifidus muscle and longissimus muscle [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2021, 39(6): 631-634.
[15]	Huang Fuming, Fan Shicai, Huang Haizhou, Zhou Jihui, Lin Shibang. Selection of surgical approach based on three-column classification for acetabular fractures [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2021, 39(6): 750-754.