Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 336-341.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2021.03.016

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative study of arthroscopic double row suture bridge " without knot" repair technology in the treatment of elderly rotator cuff injury

Liu Weile1, Zheng Shaowei1, Li Xu2, Wang Yin2, Shi Zhanjun3, Sun Chunhan  1,  Xie Fujie1, Zhong Haobo1   

  1. 1.Department of Orthopedics, Huizhou First Hospital, Huizhou 516000, Guangdong Province, China;  2. Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524023, Guangdong Province, China;  3.Department of Orthopedics Surgery,Nanfang Hospital,Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2020-06-14 Online:2021-05-25 Published:2021-06-02
  • About author:刘伟乐(1982-),副主任医师,主要研究方向为骨关节疾病的基础和临床,E-mail:zswljq@126.com

Abstract: Objective To compare the effect of double-row suture bridge " without knot" and "with knot" repair technology under the arthroscopy for the treatment of elderly rotator cuff injury. Methods Sixty-nine elderly patients with rotator cuff injury admitted to Huizhou people’s Hospital from January 2016 to February 2019 were prospectively collected and 35 cases were randomly asigned into a control groups (articular endoscope double-row suture bridge "with knot" repair technique ) and 34 cases were into an observation group (arthroscope double-row suture bridge "without knot" repair technique). The joint function and the retear rate with different degree of injury were compared between the two groups 3 months and 6 months after operation. Results There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristic, UCLA, ASES, and Constant-Murley scores between the observation group and the control group before treatment (P> 0.05). However, at 6 months after operation, the UCLA, ASES, and Constant-Murley scores of the two groups were better than those before operation (P<0.001). There was no significant differences in the UCLA、ASES、Constant-Murley scores between the observation group and control group after operation from all the patients in the whole group and light-moderate tears degree subgroups. Among the subgroups with heavy-large tears, the UCLA, ASES, and Constant-Murley scores of the observation group were significantly better than those of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant differences in the antexion of the shoulder joint and the degree of external rotation of the two groups after operation (P>0.05). The incidence of re-tearing in the control group was higher than that in the observation group (17.1% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.051). Conclusions Both double-row suture bridge "with knot" and "without knot" repairs are effective and feasible in elderly patients with rotator cuff injury. For patients with heavy-large tears degree, the "without-knot" technique may be more advantageous.

Key words: The elderly; Rotator cuff injury; Suture bridge technique; Shoulder joint, arthroscope

CLC Number: