微创经肌间隙入路椎间孔椎体间融合术治疗下腰椎退变性疾病的评价

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2015.03.027

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To explore the clinical outcome of through spatium intermuscalare of multifidus for transforaminallumbar interbody fusion. Methods From April 2010 to April 2012，27 patients underwent screw fixation plus transforaminallumbar interbody fusion through spatium intermusculareof multifidus. There were 12 males and 15 femaleswith the mean age of 58.2 years (range，46~74years). Among them 7 cases hadfar-lateral lumbardisc herniation，3 cases had post-discectomy recurrence，and 17 cases had degenerative instability. Results The average skin incision length was 4.2 cm (range，4.0~4.5 cm)，the average operative time was 90 min(range，70~160 min)，and the average blood loss was 130 ml (range，90~250 m1)．All cases were followed up for 8~20 months (average 13.6 months)．Postoperative radiography showed no evidenceof instrument failure，and all cases got bone fusion．At final followed-up the average leg pain VAS decreased from 7.4±1.1 preoperatively to 2.4±1.3 postoperatively，the averse low back pain VAS decreased from 6.7±1.3 preoperatively to 1.8±1.5 postoperatively． According to Nakai ncriterion，22 cases were rated asexcellent，3 cases as good，and 2 case as fair with the total excellent and good rate of 92.6％. Conclusions Transforaminallumbar interbody fusion through spatium intermusculareof multifidus has some advantages of minimal invasiveness，less blood loss，less complications and reliable curative effect．It is a satisfactory lumbarfusion method undersuitable indication．

Key words: Foramen intervertebrale, Interbody fusion, Minimally invasive, Muhifidus muscle

References

[1] Harms J, Rolinger H. A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion (author's transl)[J]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb, 1982,120(3):343-347.
[2] Ozgur BM, Yoo K, Rodriguez G, et al. Minimally-invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)[J]. Eur Spine J, 2005, 14(9):887-894.
[3] Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG, et al. Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion[J]. Spine, 2001, 26(5):567-571.
[4] Javernick MA, Kuklo TR, Polly DJ. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: unilateral versus bilateral disk removal--an in vivo study[J]. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 2003, 32(7):344-348.
[5] Amin BY, Tu TH, Mummaneni PV. Mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2013, 35(2 Suppl):2.
[6] Mummaneni PV, Haid RW, Rodts GE. Lumbar interbody fusion: state-of-the-art technical advances. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2004,1(1):24-30.

[7] Danneels LA, Vanderstraeten GG, Cambier DC, et al. CT imaging of trunk muscles in chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects[J]. Eur Spine J, 2000, 9(4):266-272.
[8] Stevens KJ, Spenciner DB, Griffiths KL, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2006,19(2):77-86.
[9] Kuriyama N, Ito H. Electromyographic functional analysis of the lumbar spinal muscles with low back pain[J]. J Nippon Med Sch, 2005,72(3):165-173.
[10] Hoh DJ, Wang MY, Ritland SL. Anatomic features of the paramedian muscle-splitting approaches to the lumbar spine[J]. Neurosurgery, 2010, 66(3 Suppl Operative):13-25.
[11] 杨明杰，李立钧，祝建光，等．数字化设计微创极外侧经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术[J]．中华骨科杂志，2011，31 ( 10) : 1093-1098．
[12] 姜晓幸,费琴明,王晓峰, 等.微创TLIF手术的手术方法和早期临床结果[J].中国临床医学,2006,13(4):642-644.
[13] 刘晓光.如何看待微创与传统开放TLIF手术开放腰椎椎体间融合手术过时了么 [J]？中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2014,24(5):388-390.
[14] 余可谊.腰椎微创TLIF不同内固定解决方案的有限元分析[D].北京协和医学院,2011.

[1]	Liu Yu, Gu Sanjun, Xu Yaozeng, Li Haifeng, Wei Changbao, Yin Qin . Reason and strategies of intraoperative complications of minimally invasive hip arthroplasty using SuperPATH approach in the treatment of elderly patients with femoral neck fracture [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(4): 465-469.
[2]	Zhou Chunhui, Lv Wenying, Dong Chao, Zhang Jianning, Sun Junzhao. Application of multimodal electromagnetic navigation in endoscopic endonasal approach of fresh cadavers [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2023, 41(2): 156-161.
[3]	Li Rui, Xu Caiyuan, Sun He, Zhang Yilong. Effect and prognosis of oblique lateral interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and its influence on oxidative stress index levels [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(4): 491-496.
[4]	Wang Hongwei , Li Kaixiang, Wang Qingyun, Li Ruibing, Liu Xiaoqiang. Anatomical study of lower lumbar Kambin triangle based on MRN technique [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(3): 267-270.
[5]	Chen Liang, Hu Dingxiang, Duan Chao, Ma Chenxi , Deng Chuanfen, Liu Min. The treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with modified incision placement of proximal femur antirotational intramedullary nail [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(3): 333-337.
[6]	Yu Sheng, Pang Qingjiang. Anatomy of the cervical foraminal ligament and its clinical significance [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(1): 109-112.
[7]	Yan Huibo, Deng Shangxi, Li Qingchu, Jin Dadi, Liu Zezheng, Cheng Liang, Jiang Jian. The application and 5 years follow-up of stand-alone MC+polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) Cage in anterior cervical fusion [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2021, 39(5): 603-608.
[8]	Wei Ruihong, Zhuang Yongqing, Liu Yingnan, Wen Guifen, Ke Yanna, Liu Zhidong, Chen Chun-ling, Huang Jietao, Liu Zhaokang, Xu Tao, Lao Jie . Anatomical study and clinical application of supraclavicular endoscopic surgery for thoracic outlet syndrome [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2021, 39(4): 388-391.
[9]	Wang Le, Zeng Yuwei, Liu Song, Zhang Qingshun, Liang Daxuan, Hu Wei, Wu Zenghui. Significance of the anterior longitudinal ligament for the extreme lateral interbody fusion approach in lumbar spine [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2021, 39(4): 449-453.
[10]	Ge Xinjiang, You Jianjun, Liu Xiaofeng, Ma Ying. Efficacy and prognosis of arthroscopic-assisted MIPPO technique in the treatment of elderly Schatzker II-III tibial plateau fractures [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2021, 39(3): 342-345.
[11]	Wei Ke, Chen Qiwang, Mao Haijiao. Clinical study of minimally invasive percutaneous screw fixation for digital treatment of talar posterior process fractures [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2021, 39(2): 192-195.
[12]	Zhang Haifeng, Zhan Xinhua, Fu Zeze, Wu Jianfeng, Fu Qiang. Imaging anatomical measurement and clinical significance in minimally invasive surgery of the lower lumbar laminae interval space [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2021, 39(1): 37-40.
[13]	XUE Hou-jun, PAN Lei, HUANG Jie-bin, LEI Yu, WANG Shi-cheng, CHEN Wei-xiong. Comparison of the clinical application of percutaneous endoscopic TESSY and BESI technology in L5~S1 disc herniation [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2020, 38(6): 709-714.
[14]	YAN Hui-bo, JIN Da-di, LI Qing-chu, QIU Yi-yan, WU Yi, YANG Chang-sheng . The efficacy and safety of the surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation with anterior lumbar interbody fusion [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2020, 38(5): 600-604.
[15]	CHEN Peng-cheng, ZHONG Hai-lin, WANG Le, ZHANG Hai-ying, LIU Yi-heng, LIAN Xiao-feng. Clinical efficacy of MIS-TLIF assisted with microscope in treatment of lumbar single-segment degenerative diseases [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2020, 38(4): 455-460.

Clinical study of minimally invasive spatium intermuscalare of multifidus for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0